Re: Low Doses of Iodine vs high doses

lolite, you have losted me, Perhaps my words did not express the true meaning of the article, they were not building a fear of iodine, they were stating some factual data, that low levels of R Iodine was more harmful than larger doses
The WC affect was a scientific lie, undoutedly funded by drug manufacturers, who had everything to gain from the sale of medication, at the time, Antibiotics . Our government at the hands of the National Institute of Health supported their findings, which lent credence to this lie.
Our governement continue to propogate that lie, as FDA still recommends micrograms of iodine, to do anything else would admit to their destructive lie.
Has NIH or Dr. W or Dr. C, or the University of Berkley ever recanted their scientific lie, no, no, and hell no.
To indirectly support this scientific lie, AMA shortly after the above, demanded licensed MD's only prescirbe prescription drugs, so if lie one did not kill iodine, the AMA delivered the final blow.
It is beyond my imagination, we put to death murderers, rapist for harming another. Yet a crime like the above, supported by our national governement, and the university of berkley go unscathed, although indirectly they killed more people than our wars.
Obviously the fault goes back to the rule makers, our justice system, who makes the rulez? white collar workers, whoa, It all starts at the top and tumbles down, our supreme court.
More than likely the profits from the first hour of sale of Antibiotics went under the table to those people and agencies. david lubbock tx.