Re: Perfectmus is history at CZ (banned)

I don't know who you are directing this to, but I'll have to disagree with you in regards to anyone ridiculing "Perfectimus" as clearly he was not ridiculed as a matter of course. Any responses to him that appear to ridicule him is as a consequence of his own making.

His being banned, well, I am new here, but I can read, and I saw how he worked hard to get himself banned. I don't think anyone was looking to do this to him, but he constantly hocked, and pushed his products, but crossed the line when he started to belittle others and their respective products.

I've stated in the past, I do not have a pony in this race. I do not manufacture for sale or profit. I am certain that like yourself, I am here to get better and to learn about CS.

I don't have a degree in chemistry nor physics, but here is the BUT, I took high school chemistry, then went on to take chem 1, chem 2 and organic chemistry in college, more years ago than I care to remember. I caught "Perfectimus" copy/pasting material that relate directly to quantum physics which have NO BEARING at our level of discussion. I guarantee, that unless someone coaches him to explain what he wrote, he would be at a loss! Also, He wrote that Science does not have an adequate explanation of nano-particles. That is clearly butkus. Dr. Robert Beck ( renowned physicist) brought out that silver will sinter off into tiny pieces 1.26 angstrom in size. THAT by definition is a nano-particle. This was easily accomplished by running a current through two silver anodes in a water solution.

Maybe his product worked for you, I say great. I also think that there was a place in the scheme of things for his product, but he chose to drown other discussions through brow beating others. He did this to himself. Tweet