Re: new study

 Two serious adverse events were detected (one case of breast cancer and one case of estrogen receptor–negative endometrial cancer), which was less than the expected population rate for these cancers.


"which was less than the expected population rate for these cancers"

To me that suggests a positive effect for soy....incidence of cancer was less than normal.

Yes, I agree.  But the point I was making is that they are implying the soy was responsible for the cancers, even though it had nothing to do with it.  It is like all the cases of death by pharmaceutical ephedrine HCl that were blamed on the herb ephedra to facilitate banning the herb.