you missed the point...on purpose.

sarah palin isn't the "victim" and you and your media have branded her a target because of scant few words she's spoken that use gun-related jargon and symbolism. nice try. we who think clearly here on curezone have been served this tiresome meal one too many times from your ilk. oh, you have open forum here to say it, but let me assure you that going after palin and her minions because she shoots moose in alaska or uses the term "crosshairs" on her charts...doesn't naturally evolve into causing a nut to shoot down moderate democrats in a supermarket parking lot. listen to yourself before you type. do you really want to be associated with that thought process you display? no one would. the nra and freedom of speech proponents and second amendment followers aren't to blame for a nut to shoot people. when democrats shoot republicans i don't blame you, now do i? of course not. blame the people who pull the trigger and leave the rest alone. amerika is chock full of crackpots because of a laundry list of reasons, including ease of gun ownership. i could easily find quotes and verbal strategies of democrat liberals who use gun references and such lingo and phrases describing battle plans to defeat an opposition. but to do that would embarass myself and those who enjoy my posts. they deserve better. think before you post. you gag with disgust at her use of "blood libel"???? lol...grow up, man. that's not even in the top 100 of incorrectly-used phrases. i doubt you ever are disgusted by anything a democrat liberal says...that i'll bet the money in my wallet on.