Re: UCADIA Conference Call 1/6/2011

UCADIA Conference call of 1/6/2011


“The first area I want to cover tonight is an issue of NECESSITY, COMPLIANCE & ‘UNDER DURESS’. And the reason I want to cover this area first is I believe it is an area of how we’ve come to be here, that unfortunately, continues to trip us up in how we deal with hearings, summonses and arrests, and how to conduct ourselves to give ourselves the maximum opportunity of success within their court system.

The other area that I’m going to be talking about is the updates of the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll on the site.
I then want to cover with you some important updates to the Canon Laws. These are evolving meanings where we thought we knew, where we thought we uncovered some of the practices, behaviors and deep hidden realizations embedded within the law. We are constantly finding more and more as the vial has now dropped. For example, what we thought ‘Title’ was is something slightly different. So I want to go through some of these Canons with you.

I then want to talk to you about something called the ‘Aire of Credibility’ when you speaking to people about ‘big’ issues like the current system of the world being a system of slavery. And, in fact, how you can we prove that - once and for all. How you can actually prove to people that we do, in fact, live in a system of Roman slavery. And I want thank the reseachers over in the U.K. to some of the brilliant insights that come through that.

I will also cover some issues over Foreclosures.

NECESSITY, COMPLIANCE & ‘UNDER DURESS’
If you think about your own existing problems and the problems that you face, and the people that you know, …of all the people that have lost their homes, gone to prison, been fined, got into trouble, versus those people that have succeeded, then overwelmingly the system is geared against us. And that’s common sense. But I just want you to imagine those to groups.

Then I want you to consider all the people that have suffered, including yourself, and think about this: In almost every case, there is a common thread between them all. Whether it be a child, family issue, a mortgage, a debt, whether it be whatever it is, there is one thing that seems to pervade that, it is the theme that we are under the belief, that if we don’t comply, if we stand our ground, then we hold our moral right, then whatever they do is unjust.

Looking at the other side. There is also a single thread that runs through the group of people that have had successes, and what we find is that those did not put themselves into dishonor in the system, no matter how mad the system is, no matter how evil the system is, they stayed in honor , they attended the hearing, so there was no arrest warrant for them. There were respectful for the judge. But they did something unmistakeable: they made it known that they were there ‘UNDER DURESS as a matter of NECESSITY.
And that their signature would be a matter of NECESSITY ‘UNDER DURESS’. And whilst they would Comply, their Compliance could not possibly be regarded as CONSENT because they are UNDER DURESS.