Re: Top Researcher Finds Medical Studies to be Largely Wrong or Fraudulent

Private? You're on the web!

True but far from all of the web is a free-for-all where anyone can post whatever they like.  Web or not, this is a private forum which I own and moderate.  That means I set what the theme is and decide what is or is not appropriate to post here.  While it is not my intention to stifle opinions which may differ from mine, it is my firm intention to keep this forum on topic and not have it turn into a debate forum or provide a stage for propenents of mainstream medicine.  Notice that I have not censored or edited your messages nor have I banned you from this forum - though I could do any of those if I so desired.  And might yet do if you continue to try to provoke me, engage in prolonged debate or try to use this forum to defend mainstream medicine.

From what I see here, pretty soon my head will explode! You'd like that.

No, I would never like to see anyone's head explode - that would be decidedly unhealthy.  Don't worry though, from what I have seen I am pretty confidant that your head is in no imminent danger of being overly full anytime soon.

Apologists defend a faith - I much prefer data analysis. The efficacy of a particular treatment modality is not validated by defences, debates or arguments, it's supported by FACTS. I've seen the facts - lots of them for years

I have seen many things which have been put forward as facts for years myself which have been anything but factual - quite likely a great many more years than you have.  Mainstream medicine itself is pretty much an exercise in faith.  It is inevitable that those who worship it and use its self-generated data and studies will be proven to have worshipped false gods in years to come - primarily because they are proceeding largely under the false premise of Pasteur's germ theory of disease and largely in ignorance of the roles proper diet and nutrition play, the roles toxins play, and the roles that nature's healing herbs and other plants can play in preventing and actually healing disease instead of managing symptoms.

In every age, there are masses of people who falsely believe that the science of the day has reached the pinnacle of understanding when history has proved time and again that the science of today will often be overturned and proven to be the quackery of tomorrow.  Just as it was proven in the past that the earth was not flat and that the sun did not revolve around the earth, so will the use of unnatural compounds not found in nature be proven to be antithetical to healing natural bodies.

If it helps any, a couple of decades ago I pretty much had blind faith in mainstream medicine and science too.  But I opened my own head up and did not allow my pre-conceptions and mainstream conditioning to prevent me from learning the truth.  Maybe the same can happen for you and you can fill your head with healthy information.  If it begins to feel a bit crowded, just discard some of those junk facts you have misslearned over the years.  Science is ever changing.  Nature on the other hand, remains true through the ages.

"We have no real proof of the boasted effectiveness of any form of anti-toxin or vaccine or serum... If such a vaccinated or immunised person contracts the disease which he is supposed to be protected, it is pretty good evidence that such "protection" is valueless, isn't it? Surely people do contract disease against which they are supposed to be immunised, as we all know.... Well, are you satisfied that WE ARE QUACKS? In the eyes of those who are willing to forgot the present prestige of medicine, such as it is, with all its dignity, its scientific jargon, its pratings of altruism, its great endowment, its well heralded "achievements," we are most assuredly quacks, professing to do things we cannot do, and yes, taking money under this pretence." Dr. Paul M. Koonin, D.D.Sc.

"Unless the doctor of today becomes the dietitian of tomorrow, the dietitian of today will become the doctor of tomorrow." Dr. Alexis Carrol, famous biological scientist and head of the Rockefeller Institute