how so? for calling you to produce what you said you would produce. Is your entire rant based on this? that the pineal frq is "very close" to a frq that you claim is somehow harmful? none of your posts even suggest that the "very close" frq is actually harmful, so, why would anyone take at face value your claim that the a frq that is "very close" is also harmful? how does demanding truth and accountability make me a troll? you made your point and claimed you could prove it... somehow I think we are not going to see that proof, are we? so it goes.