Thanks for this post Uny. For those who care about issues such as freedom, freedom of speech and the right to have and speak views that fall outside of mainstream, we need to get the message out about Wikipedia.
I may be wrong but do not many people here know how Wiki arrived at the decision to delete the better part of what had been their file on Dr. Richard Shulze? This went down about 3 years ago and I thought there were people here aware of that situation....but maybe not. The bottom line on what they did is that they revised their own policies on what constitutes "wiki caliber" source / reference material, after which they then decided "oh, gee, this means that our file on Richard Shulze contains info that does not meet our policy... therefore we are obligated to delete it." This of course has become the revolving door type of foundation that makes the "world's open source of information".