Re: This is not really a rife forum

This has been a re-occuring concern with this forum by some users and leads to much unneccessary and negative energy. It appears the problem lies with the perceived interpretation of the title, which some see much more restricted than others.

As you point out, Tizona, there are some other Rife Forums available which deal with Rife technology in a more specific sense, from a technological point, rather than a quantum approach. The question is: do we need another one of the same, and what are they lacking that you are hoping to find in this one - or is there more learning potential in a different forum that has morphed with Rife in a new and diverse sense, including doctrine and necessary supplements?

The title may not convey the closest definition of what the majority of posters come here to discuss and some visitors take offense. How many? Who knows, as you point out only a few may voice their opinions. I am not familiar with the structure of these forums. For the sake of saving the volumes of research leading to the present discussions, would it be possible to expand the title of this forum to what has evolved? Does anybody know an answer to this?

I assume the development of a new forum altogether under a broader title, leaving this one to explore Rife in its stricter sense, would likely result in the loss, or much confusion of the research leading to current events here.

What's the answer to this all? Can we accept that this forum may have expanded past the conceptual title it once received and move forward with what it has become, or is it necessary to rip it apart and split people into categories? What's in a title?