Re: Is IF #1 safe for prolonged use?

Just adding my 2 cents to what Uny already said.

I'm not pinpointing my comments at you but instead am pinpoining at the source of this apparent widespread propaganda.

The bit about "we get addicted to them and our bowels will not work without them...." is a refrain I've seen / heard repeatedly regarding natural remedies in general and bowel cleaning remedies in specific. I guess on the one hand it doesn't really surprise me to see that this kind of mainstream sentiment is so widely repeated by people. After all, the masses tend to be tightly plugged in to the mainstream media and the mainstream media does spout a lot of orthodox medical doctrine..... but on the other hand, even if we concede the orthodox propaganda is true in this case (it isn't, but lets pretend it is) it seems to me that in this specific case the people who have gotten caught up in repeating this mainstream worry may have lost sight of the fact that a person using a natural bowell remedy likely had bowelss that were not working BEFORE they began a natural remedy like LBB. If a person had bowells not working before, and then end up with bowells not working after they stop LBB, what have they lost? I think it may be worthwhile for people to reconsider what it may be, exactly, that the orthodox medical community wants them to be afraid of in this kind of situation. Tweet