Re: Zapping Trichinella?

The use of frequencies to aim to a specific pathogen is on the air for a long time.
Dr H. Clark used this technique before discovering the Direct Current effect on parasites.

When using frequency, you can use the direct frequency, as you will find them on the frequency table. No need for a DC current. No need for a H.Clark zapper.
As stated by Dr Clark, 5V and 3mn at this very precise frequency will do the job. For a single family of pathogens.

Instead of this “direct frequency” (404.5kHz for trichinella), you can use a sub-harmonic of this frequency.

163th Sub-harmonic of 404.50kHz (404.50kHz/163) = 2.481595Hz
This frequency (2.481kHz) will hit the direct frequency with its 163th harmonic, but will do so only 1/163 of the time, needing (in theory) 163 more time to do the same effect.

There is another aspect to this easy-to-make frequency of about 2.5kHz :
The 163th harmonic will have only 1/163 of the voltage of the fundamental.
Is this powerful enough to get rid of trichinellla? (Thanks God, we are aiming at tiny microbes/worms, and not Godzila monsters.)

Only Lab experimentation could answer in a “scientific” way.
On a practical point of view, 2.5kHz has a so good reputation, I will say “probably yes”.

So, less (but enough) power, and not so much handshaking will lead to longer times than the original 3mn… or to multiple session.

3 times 30mn seems a good start to try with, waiting for more reliable data.

We are trading here expensive precision for cheap sweep and longer sessions.

In your case, only experimentation will give you an answer good for you (and maybe for others)
Tweet