CureZone   Log On   Join
Copy of Temp Place Holder 1
 
Will_I_Ever_Learn Views: 2,635
Published: 14 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,609,805

Copy of Temp Place Holder 1


Where have the minerals gone?
Meat & Dairy
the effect of modern farming
on the quality of our food
Food Magazine
, January-March 2006
www.foodcomm.org.uk/PDF%20files/meat_dairy2.pdf

In this magazine a year ago we highlighted the loss of essential minerals—calcium, sodium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, etc—from our fruit and vegetable supply.

The figures made alarming reading. Comparing the mineral levels in the 1930s with those in the 1980s showed that modern fruits and vegetables were typically depleted in minerals by 20%. The fact that modern fruit and vegetables contained more water could only explain some of the losses. Intensive farming on exhausted land was likely to be the major cause of the decline in the nutritional quality of the food, along with the selection of varieties for qualities other than nutrition.

Now, researcher David Thomas has analysed data on meat and dairy foods, comparing their levels in the 1930s (published by McCance & Widdowson in 1940) with the most recent government tables, published in 2002. Once again, the figures make alarming reading.

Table 1. Changes in mineral composition
of milk 1940-2002
1940 2002 change
values in milligrams
Sodium 50 43 down 14%
Potassium 160 155 down 3%
Phosphorus 95 93 down 2%
Magnesium 14 11 down 21%
Calcium 120 118 down 2%
Iron 0.08 0.03 down 62%
Copper 0.02 >0.01 all gone
Sources
McCance and Widdowson 1940
McCance and Widdowson 6th edition 2002
Commentary on changes in mineral composition

David Thomas, unpublished

As we show on this page, the mineral content of popular meats and milk products has fallen significantly. Looking at 15 different meat items, Thomas found the iron content to have fallen on average 47%, with some products showing a fall as high as 80%. The iron content of milk had dropped by over 60% while for cream and eight different cheeses the iron loss was over 50%.

The calcium loss from milk was only slight, but from cheeses it averaged over 15%—and in high-value Parmesan cheese the loss was an extraordinary 70%, implying a considerable dilution of the original highly concentrated recipe for this cheese, or some other significant shift in ingredients to account for this change.

Copper and magnesium, essential for enzyme functioning, also showed losses in meat products (typically, 10% fall for magnesium, and 60% fall for copper) and dairy foods (typically, 25% fall for magnesium, and an extraordinary 90% fall in copper).

Should we worry?

Table 2. Mineral levels in selected foods
showing 1940 values and amount lost by 2002
Magnesium change Calcium change Iron change
values in milligrams per 100 grams
Cheddar 46.9 down 38% 810 down 9% 0.57 down 47%
Stilton 27.2 down 45% 362 down 10% 0.46 down 57%
Parmesan 49.6 down 70% 1220 down 70% 0.3 all gone
Beef rump steak 24.8 down 7% 5.2 down 4% 6 down 55%
Corned beef 29 down 48% 12.8 down 45% 9.8 down 76%
Streaky bacon 25.1 down 16% 52.3 down 87% 3.2 down 78%
Chicken roast 23 no change 24.5 down 31% 2.6 down 69%
Turkey 28.2 down 4% 38.3 down 71% 3.8 down 79%

We live longer than ever, and we have access to abundant food supplies, so are these changes in nutrients any reason to be concerned?

We believe so. Minerals and trace elements play a major role in our physical and psychological well being. The recent changes in dietary habits towards highly processed foods means we are likely to be over-fed yet malnourished in terms of these micronutrients. Medical science may help keep us alive longer, but we are not necessarily healthier, nor happier. As Thomas concludes, "minerals are what we are made of, (to quote the Bible: 'ashes to ashes, dust to dust') and it would be very difficult to overestimate their importance as a catalyst for developing and maintaining good health'.*

The recent National Diet and Nutrition Survey of adults showed that young women, particularly, were likely to have diets seriously deficient in essential minerals. Up to 8% were below the Lower Reference Nutrient Intake (LRNI) for calcium, 20-22 percent were below the LRNI for magnesium, and 40% were blow the LRNI for iron. LRNI is the amount of a nutrient that is enough for only the small number of people who have low requirements (about 2.5% of the population).The majority need more.

These women were the key age group for childbearing, and so, to continue the biblical analogy, the sins of our agricultural practices may yet be visited many-fold upon the next generation.

* David Thomas is a researcher, nutrition adviser and mineral supplement supplier
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.156 sec, (12)