Re: Another Hypothetical

In order to answer the question I would have to ask too many questions about the conditions of the hypothetical. Since IC believes in LIEquid truth I would have to ask him about the meaning of each word in his hypothetical. Once I did that he would then perceive what I said by whatever definitions he arbitrarily decided to give to the words used. The hypothetical is loaded and I see no reason to address a hypothetical that is designed to create confusion.

Sooo...There is no diversion or spin, these are facts that have been determined through the history of this forum. Why don't you set an example and answer the hypothetical yourself? Or are you just going to try and divert, spin, and point toward others?