Yet another example of unconsitutional prior restraint

Isn't it just lovely to see our taxdollars used to such benefit - instead of using those dollars to apprehend fugitives or protect the President, as is the primary duty of US Marshalls.

In the absence of proven harm from the seized devices, the Marshalls and the mainstream stooges at the FDA have no constitutional grounds for such rogue actions that amount to prior restraint.   Too bad there isn't enough influence-free guts of our lawmakers to insure that our agencies practice within the framework of the Constitution and/or pass the Ron Paul bill that would force agencies to first prove harm from any specific alternative health item before banning it.

Those of us who are familiar with ozone therapy, especially in treating cancer, know how beneficial it can be.  We also know the threat alternative therapies represent to the hundreds of billions in mainstream medicine profits from their largely failed drugs and treatmentsant THERE is the rub.