CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: any chance you could "dumb this down" for us
 
Pragmatic Views: 9,245
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,523,015

Re: any chance you could "dumb this down" for us


This is actually used as a pesticide. And is it considered a pesticide based on other criteria.

The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65) provides two mechanisms for administratively listing chemicals which are known to the State to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity [Health and Safety Code Section 25249.8(b)]. One mechanism by which a chemical is listed is if a body considered to be authoritative by the state’s qualified experts has formally identified it as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The following have been identified as authoritative bodies for purposes of the Act:

  • the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),
  • the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),
  • the National Toxicology Program (NTP),
  • the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • ,and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

The criteria for listing chemicals through the authoritative bodies mechanism are set forth in Title 22, California Code of Regulations (22 CCR),Section 12306.

The Act also provides another mechanism for the administrative listing of a chemical, that is if a state or federal agency has formally required that the chemical be labeled or identified as causing cancer or reproductive toxicity. The criteria for listing chemicals through this mechanism are set forth in 22 CCR, Section 12902.

Reproductive and developmental toxicity are known to cause birth defects or interfere with normal development. Weight-of-the-evidence evaluations of this type of toxicity have been conducted by the State of California and by the U.S. EPA under its Toxics Release Inventory program.

here is Prop 65's website:
http://www.oehha.ca.gov/prop65/CRNR_notices/admin_listing/intent_to_list/noil...

 

B. The following chemicals have been determined by OEHHA to meet the criteria set forth in 22 CCR, Section 12902 for listing based on a formal requirement for labeling or identification as causing reproductive toxicity:
 

Chemical CAS No. Toxicological Endpoints References
Amoxapine 14028-44-5 developmental toxicity FDA (1988a)
Beclomethasone dipropionate 5534-09-8 developmental toxicity FDA (1988b)
Clobetasol propionate 25122-46-7 developmental toxicity female reproductive toxicity FDA (1995a)
Codeine phosphate 52-28-8 developmental toxicity FDA (1989)
Flunisolide 3385-03-3 developmental toxicity female reproductive toxicity FDA (1984)
Fluticasone propionate 80474-14-2 developmental toxicity FDA (1995b)
Histrelin acetate --- developmental toxicity FDA (1991)
Levonorgestrel implants 797-63-7 female reproductive toxicity FDA (1995c)

Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Bad Actor Pesticides

In order to identify a "most toxic" set of pesticides, Pesticide Action Network (PAN) and Californians for Pesticide Reform (CPR) created the term PAN Bad Actor pesticides. These pesticides are at least one of the following:

I hope this helps...~ Peace be upon you www.submission.org

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.531 sec, (4)