This seems monsterously ineffectual. If you're going to go to this trouble to get quasi-accurate data... why not either use theoretical mechanisms combined with large-scale surveys to back this up? In fact, this board would be an amazing starting point for what would be, to my knowledge, the first serious survey regarding liver flushing. The survey would include experience (number of flushes), questions on favored oils, supplements, etc. With 50-100 individuals - a very reasonable number - the survey results may prove significant. Said survey results could then be formulated into a modified plan (based on the most common/most effectual reports) and that could then be tested and compared to existing plans by individuals in a second survey.