Re: Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT

From my observation, the situation with the "normal flu shot" was somewhat of a numbers game. This is based on observations the last time I willingly took a flu shot, about 10 years ago. I wonder how the numbers have been tweaked over the years?

That jab 10 years ago was sponsored by my employer who frequently (then and now) pressured employees to give up blood a couple two/three times a year, submit to "Health Risk Assessment" once a year, and receive the flu jab sometime between fall and winter. Even though I accepted that shot back then, I had already become suspicious of the practice. It went like this. In somewhat typical herd fashion, jabees were scheduled alphabetically. When your number / letter came up, you went to get in line at the mini lab set up in the basement. At the front of the line there was offered a handout - pamphlet. I noticed most people were declining the hand out. I took one. It was one sheet of paper, printed on both sides in small print....looked kinda like lawyer talk, except medical lawyer talk. It began by expounding upon the many virtues of artificial immunization. From here it slowly progressed into mention that most people who get the jab will not experience any illness or discomfort beyond the initial jab.....but a relative few people may develop a sore spot or bruise near the jab site......and a relatively fewer people may develop mild flu symptoms within a day or two.....and (I can't remember exactly, so I'll use rough / approximate numbers ) somewhere around 10 people out of 1000 will develop some adverse reactions that could be any of the gambit of high fever, seizures, convulsions, brain hemorrhage, organ failure and the like .... and a small percentage of these people will be maimed for life.... and a small percentage per 1000 will die as a result of these effects, what many people have been trained to think of in terms of "side effects".

So there I was reading all of this finely printed data and I still had not gotten the jab yet but was getting closer. The end of this document listed a Lot #.... sort of like inventory control in case there was a bad batch.....but in consideration of all of the foregoing, how, pray tell, do these medical criminals define "bad batch" ? Anyway, I quickly did a little rough math in my head and determined that somewhere around several thousand people per million jabbed, according to the data I just read, are expected to have adverse reactions and some of these people will either die or have life-long debilitating illness as a result........then I considered my odds..... tried to remember how good / bad of a person I had been of recent....even .thought about karma for a second or two..... briefly thought about Clint Eastwood, wondered how lucky I might be this day.... punk....even thought a quick prayer before stepping forward like a robot, rolled up sleeve, received jab, exited right.........and aside from a sore spot at the injection site for a few days, far as I know, I did not incur any serious effects.....that I know of. That was about 10 years ago. Today I have no plans to ever willingly accept any such kind of jab. It may have to be literally over my dead body....but I still wonder, the jab technology has obviously been rolling forward the past 10 years.... I wonder what the stats... percentages and such for harmful effects are today, per every million jabs ? Tweet