US judge rules against compulsory vaccinations

Posted on: http://www.glastonburyradio.net/new/news.php?readmore=126


US judge rules against compulsory vaccinations
> Wednesday, August 12th, 2009 - For Immediate Release:
>
> 30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law:
>
> US Court issues an injunction to stop it and to hold the the
> government and drug companies responsible for reactions.
>
> A Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has
> been issued in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This
> comes
after a
> federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by
> Tim Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal
> government as defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary
> Injunction, it will stop
the
> federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take flu
> vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local
> government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person
> who is not vaccinated from being denied any services or
> constitutional rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and
> several pages of evidentiary Exhibits.
>
> Vawter's legal papers have been written not only for filing in
federal
> court, but additionally so they can be looked at by activists
> around the world for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own
> countries to help stop forced vaccinations. Vawter believes that as
> the truth of the dangers of
flu
> vaccines continues to become known, banning the forced use of them
> will eventually succeed on a worldwide basis. He cautions people to
> avoid fear and keep themselves focused on the task of blocking
> forced vaccination.
>
> Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations
in
> the U.S.
>
> The Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and
read
> the papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction
> that it appears the federal government has engaged in some amount
> of negligence
with
> regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu
> vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence
> submitted does
warrant
> a more thorough investigation into the safety of the flu vaccines.
>
> The Court ordered that the government shall be forbidden from
forcing
> any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination against
> that person's free will and free choice. The government will not
> allow any
state
> or local government, or any party, to force any person to be
> required to take any influenza vaccination against that person's
> free will and free choice.
>
> U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of
> the Constitution
> In his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government
has
> engaged in gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that
are
> proven to be dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The
vaccines
> scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals
> including thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause
> autism in children
with
> lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic ingredients.
> The federal government has stated it will force these flu vaccines
> onto the American public against their will, under a document
> signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
>
> He further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions
of
> dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions
> advertising a "Phase 6 Pandemic" that the evidence shows does not
> really exist. The federal government has not required the World
> Health
Organization
> (WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There has been no collection
of
> facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being questioned, hearings being held,
or
> lie detector tests being given when preposterous statements have been
made.
> The WHO declared a massive "Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic", even though only
a
> few hundred people worldwide had so far died of this swine flu
> virus, and when far more people die each year of regular flu.
>
> Vawter noted there is a preponderance of evidence to show
> that the federal government so poorly trained its employees that
> they eagerly
agreed
> with the unsubstantiated claims of the WHO in the face of evidence
> to the contrary.
>
> Forced vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the
> Constitution by allowing the government to enter homes and force
> people
to
> be vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for
> vaccination. It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional
> rights
by
> depriving people of liberty without due process of law.
>
> Vawter charged that the federal government has engaged in
> gross negligence by failing to properly investigate factual
> evidence submitted
by
> esteemed medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines
have
> caused serious damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal
mercury
> is being used in the new flu vaccines being prepared.
>
> The government has failed to investigate profiteering..
> Billions of dollars in vaccine sales can cause organizations to
> falsify threats so as
to
> cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.
>
> The government is guilty of gross negligence because its
> employees failed to properly investigate the release of a case of
> live swine flu virus. One of the main companies the government
> deals with, Baxter
Vaccines,
> was apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that
was
> released on a public train earlier this year. A lab technician with
> the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had traveled to
> Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with
> the H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their
> container allowed
pressure
> to build up, and the ampoules exploded as the train was pulling
> into a station.
>
> The highly reputable UK newspaper "the Telegraph" reported on July
2nd
> that flu vaccines tested on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.
> Vawter charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show
> that government will not provide people being vaccinated with a
> list of the vaccine ingredients and possible negative side effects
> before they are vaccinated. Most of the public will not know this
> flu vaccine contains thimerosal mercury.
>
> Vawter submitted an Order to force the government to publish
vaccine
> ingredients and side effects, and to give this information to everyone
who
> takes a flu vaccine, and do so at least 3 days prior to their
vaccination. A
> denial of this order would violate Plaintiff's rights to demand the
> government obey the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by
> requiring
it
> to engage in freedom of speech. The First Amendment not only allows
> a citizen to have freedom of speech himself, but it allows a
> citizen to
demand
> his government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the use
of
> such as these vaccinations to the public.
>
> The government proclamation stating a person cannot sue for
> any damages he receives from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses
> the
congress
> and the court system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the
> Constitution which grants the right to sue to recover for damages.
> Vawter submitted an Order to deem unconstitutional any
> proclamation, rule or similar law that forbids people from suing
> for damages resulting from the vaccines of 2009 and 2010.
>
> Robert O. Young, Ph.D., D.Sc.
>
> Founder of 'THE NEW BIOLOGY' ®
> Creator of the 'SCIENCE OF ALKALINE
> LIVING'T for Health.
> -----------------------------------------------
>