I'm sorry, but the leap from mass casualty planning to "false flag attack" is poorly documented.
In fact, the false flag comment (anecdote at best) is not documented at all.
I think we need to be a bit sharper in picking our fights. Leaked info about a false flag attack would be different. So would admitting that it's speculation. I have no problem with valid leaks or admitting speculation. I have a problem with somebody throwing this out as "proof" of a false flag attack.
Hey, I'm just looking for accuracy in reporting, that's all.