Re: Dr. Deagle vs MMS

Hello LiveNotDie,

I happened to have done a fair amount of reasearch on Miracle-Mineral-Supplement and the Miracle-Mineral-Supplement protocol...

Jim Humble doesn't seem to understand the Science of chlorine dioxide, doesn't want to share his testing procedures and the results that led him to developing the Miracle-Mineral-Supplement protocol, and the few test results that he does share in his book can not be reproduced with similar results. He was offered the means to distribute MMS to areas effected with malaria with the condition that he had to offer clinical proof that MMS works against malaria. He has not been able to offer this proof and the areas that are suffering from malaria are still suffering in spite of Jim Humbles claims of a miracle cure.

In his book, Jim Humble provides a number of testimonials and contact information on how to contact those people. When efforts were made to verify these claims, no one had even heard of Jim Humble, let alone have any knowledge of a miracle cure for malaria.

The MMS protocol is flawed, and there is little Science behind it.

Jim Humble makes an effort to answer questions about MMS. Unfortunately, he often gives wrong information...

You can look through a discussion of his frequently asked questions by reviewing the posts on pages 25 and 26 in this section of the forum.

Jim Humble has had the opportunity to accomplish much, but has chosen to sit back and he seems to be "making it up" as he goes. Some have picked up the ball and are trying to do something productive with MMS, but this work should have been done by Jim Humble before, or while, he started promoting MMS.

I am pleased that some people experience improved health in spite of using MMS, but those results tend to be anecdotal and it is difficult to know what caused the improvements. There are many people who followed the MMS protocol, did not find improved health, and simply moved on to something else. In addition, many used MMS along with a variety of other things, and it is difficult to know if MMS produced the improvements, or if they were produced by something else.

I happen to support the use of sodium chlorite solutions, but not MMS. The MMS protocol is flawed, MMS is dangerous to handle, and MMS does not produce the results claimed by Jim Humble.

Tom Tweet