CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Darwin's Paradigm is Crumbling - restart
 
traderdrew Views: 1,688
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,439,897

Re: Darwin's Paradigm is Crumbling - restart


The Theory of Evolution fits the above requirements. The ID vs evolution controversy is a public relations problem, not a scientific problem. That is why the Discovery Institute is changing their requirements of ID from Irreducible Complexity (it failed per TTSS) to Information Theory. That is the basis of the book by Myers. Myers and the Discovery Institute is excellent in the PR, but fails miserably in the science. That is why Myers is putting the book out to the public, bypassing peer-review. I must say, Myers is persistent.

First of all, I found nobody by the name of Myers at the Discovery Institute.  I believe you are referring to Stephen Meyer.  Second of all, I believe you are jumping around into different subjects.  In your last post you started with evolution, gravity, irreducible complexity and ended up into chaos.

When you state that Intelligent Design fails miserably in the science, I already know that.  I already stated that it is not science by the way scientists define science.  ID can't honestly be reviewed by scientists because science utilizes a methodology that automatically disqualifies it.

Now, we can get into the theory of evolution and its testable aspects. (Please post some examples and we can stay on that subject.)  With all of the persuasive examples of evolution through the fossil record, I can ask, how do I know that it was done through natural selection acting on random mutations?  Most people who haven't been reading my posts would probably think, it must be true because look at the alternative.  The alternative is called creation.  However, I am not a creationist.

And by the way, irreducible complexity is falsifiable but you are satisfied with the TTSS as being something that disproves it.  Perhaps you don't like losing a debate.  Perhaps you can't understand why a creator would give us such a small example of something that seems to be the result of design instead of something as big as a mountain.   (I have credited people when they have something that I honestly think that I can't answer.)  There has been very little from you that has challenged my belief system.  I can listen to You Tube videos on ID vs evolution and find some much more challenging material.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.078 sec, (2)