Re: bottom line.....

Hello Whawk,

A 5% solution is a lot easier to work with, and is much safer to handle. However, there is a little more involved with all of this...

If ClO2 is what is causing the improvement, then HCl should be used as the activator and the proper concentration of ClO2 should be figured out. On the other hand, if HClO2 is what is causing the improvement then the activation should be maximized following industrial standards.

Of course, it may be that a combination of both is causing the benefits, but then the activation can be adjusted to minimize any adverse effects.

Keep in mind that Jim Humble claims that 70000 people received relief from malaria using a solution that only had about 1 PPM free ClO2 in it. I have treated hundreds of liters of water, while wilderness camping, and no one drinking the water has had any adverse effects from drinking it. I try to leave 1 PPM free ClO2 as a residual when disinfecting water. A small residual insures that your water will stay safe if you happen to knock your bottle over in the mud.

The main problem is that we don't know what is going on inside the body. I am following the overnight cancer cure to see if that is producing favorable results. If it does, then it would appear that ClO2 is what is causing the improvement. Once this information is understood, then a proper transport method can be figured out to get the ClO2 to where it is needed.

Tom