Re: Another group of "disreputable" experts re: 9/11

Even if those cherry picked ,taken out of context , edited qoutes are real , the people qouted are a small minority , in general not experts in the relevant fields , and all the issues raised, eg why the hole in the pentagon is smaller than the plane's wing span, why did building 7 collapse in the absence of explosives ,how could they hijack planes with boxcutters (cockpit tapes prove they did not to mention they said they had bombs) have been answered definitively by anyone who is not too lazy and/or closed minded to read the scientific research.

http:911guide.googlepages.com/home


http://911guide.googlepages.com/ryanmackey



http://911guide.googlepages.com/newtonsbit2



http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_fire.html


http:forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=2193448highlight=silverstein+million#post2193448


http://www.icivilengineer.com/news/wtc/structure.php



http://uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/d7b93a3e-0dd8-4f0b-b139-d18e169cfb35

Tweet