Date: 12/18/2006
Posted By: Jon Barron
There's an old saying, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and thinking that some day the result will be different." Now, you can argue that's also the definition of persistence as in Colonel Sanders, who was rejected by hundreds of restaurants and a thousand banks before he sold his first Kentucky Fried Chicken franchise. But when it comes to osteoporosis, it truly is the definition of insanity. Amazingly, 99% of the medical community and the media promote a solution that not only does not work, but has been proven to actually exacerbate the problem. But that's not the worst part. Even more insane is the fact that although research has shown that taking more calcium and drinking more milk actually contribute to osteoporosis and make it worse, our doctors don't just tell people to continue doing these things -- they tell us that it's not working because we're not doing enough. Therefore, we need to do even more!
As defined by the World Health Organization, osteoporosis is a generalized skeletal disorder characterized by thinning of the bone and deterioration in its architecture, causing susceptibility to fracture. The key phrase here is "susceptibility to fracture." There are two types of osteoporosis:
Note: approximately 20% of women and 40% of men with osteoporosis have a secondary cause such as hyperthyroidism or lymphoma.
Osteoporosis has been recognized as a major public health problem for only the last 20 years. (In the old days, it was just called "widow's stoop.") The increasing incidence of fragility fractures, such as spinal, hip, and wrist fractures, first became apparent from epidemiological studies in the early and mid-1980s. (NWHIC)
It is now clear that the rate of increase for osteoporosis is faster than the growth in population, and it is growing in parts of the world that never showed much evidence of it previously.
At one time, the medical mantra was that it's all hormonal. It's a woman's disease. That meant hormone replacement therapy was the answer. But as more study results came in, that theory became unsustainable -- at least by itself. It couldn't explain the dramatic increase in the incidence of osteoporosis in the United States and throughout the world, and it couldn't explain the ever increasing number of men who were becoming afflicted. So a new theory had to be developed -- the bone mineral density theory. This theory stated that people weren't getting enough calcium in their diets so they weren't able to build enough bone mineral density to serve as a reserve as they got older; thus they couldn't compensate for the natural bone loss that occurred as they aged. The obvious solution: calcium supplementation. So, according to the latest wisdom, we should:
If you go to a doctor and ask about osteoporosis, 99% of them will recommend some combination of the above -- even though we now know the protocol doesn't work and in fact contributes to osteoporosis.
Which, of course, makes us ask the question, "Why doesn't it work?"
A number of people in the alternative health community, including myself, have argued for years that excessive calcium doesn't help the problem; it contributes to it. Magnesium is far and away the more important mineral (but still a secondary piece of the puzzle) when it comes to bone loss. I covered this in detail back in 2003 in a newsletter titled The Calcium Question, but based on the number of questions I've recently received concerning osteoporosis, it seems that most people visiting the Foundation website are not finding that newsletter. So let's cover some of the key issues again, and let's begin by quickly discussing how the body builds bones.
First, (and this may be a surprise to many people) your bones are living tissue. They are not dead cement. By living tissue, I mean that bone is comprised of living cells (osteoclasts and osteoblasts) that are continually removing and replacing the mineral deposits that we normally think of as bone. The brilliance of this system might not at first be obvious. After all, what possible advantage could there be to getting rid of good bones. Isn't that osteoporosis? And the answer is that it's only osteoporosis when we mess up the balance -- when we lose more bone than we build.
Think about this for a moment. If building and replacing bone wasn't a dynamic process, how could you mend broken bones or replace aging fragile bones? And if the process went only one way (just building bone), your body would eventually become one solid mass of bone. When you are healthy, it is this dynamic process of removing and replacing the bone minerals that keeps your skeletal system healthy -- as long as that process is in equilibrium. As with almost all diseases, it is deviation from the natural state of balance that causes problems. What do I mean by deviation? Quite simply, deviation is when we start losing bone minerals faster than we replace them. That's osteoporosis.
So what causes us to go out of balance? If you believe most of what you see and hear, it's hormonal imbalance and insufficient calcium in the diet so that we cannot grow new bone fast enough -- thus the need for calcium supplements and high dairy intake and of course, HRT. But the simple truth is: the facts don't bear this out. The incidence of hip fractures (a good indicator of osteoporosis) in countries that have the highest dairy consumption in the world (like Norway, Sweden, and the United States) is 50 times greater than in countries like New Guinea and South Africa that have extremely low consumption of dairy products (and animal products in general).
Bottom line: high calcium intake does not prevent osteoporosis -- not even among people who use coral calcium.
The simple truth is that if we live a balanced lifestyle, we actually need very little calcium (of the right sort) to maintain healthy bones. The problem we have is not that we get too little calcium, but rather that we have made choices that dramatically accelerate the rate of bone loss -- to the point that we can never consume enough calcium to overcome the deficit.
Which lead us to the question of the day: what accelerates bone loss to such a degree? And there are several answers:
But all of the above factors pale in comparison to the problem of a high acid diet. This is the reason the incidence of osteoporosis has soared. This is the reason more and more men are now suffering. If you have not already done so, I suggest you read Chapter 13 of Lessons from the Miracle Doctors to better understand how a high acid diet (meat, fish, poultry, eggs, dairy, cooked grains, and refined sugars) leeches calcium from the body. The brief explanation is that when you consume a high acid diet, your body is forced to use calcium from your bones to buffer the high acid content so that your blood pH remains constant and you don't die. The problem with dairy is that it actually takes more calcium to buffer its acid content then you actually receive from the dairy -- thus the high incidence of osteoporosis in countries that consume a lot of dairy. Now, do not misunderstand. I am not saying that dairy is the biggest culprit. Actually, all of the other acid foods are worse -- particularly high-sugar colas. I just single out dairy because it's always identified as building strong bones, when the opposite is true.
So what is one to do? Well, first read Chapter 6 of Miracle Doctors. It lays out the ground rules for a diet that allows your body to build bone. It suggests minimizing the intake of animal foods (to less than 3 ounces a day) and the elimination of refined grains and sugars. At that point, the amount of highly absorbable calcium that you get in your diet from foods such as romaine lettuce, broccoli, sesame seeds and bok choy will be more than adequate to build strong bones.
Think about cows for a moment. (This is one of those questions that I love to use when I want to drive doctors crazy -- a hobby of mine.) How do cows grow such large, strong bones? They don't drink milk, and they don't take calcium supplements. They eat grass -- low in calcium, high in magnesium (magnesium is the basis of chlorophyll in plants). Consider the fact that the traditional Eskimo diet contains over 2,000 mg of calcium a day, but because their diet is so acidic (virtually 100% from animal sources), it produces the highest hip fracture rate in the world. The bottom line is that calcium supplementation will not save you from the consequences of a high acid forming diet.
And if you absolutely can't change to a more alkaline diet, then taking supplemental calcium (not milk) to buffer the excess acid probably makes sense. It won't repair any damage, but it will protect against some of the destruction you are inflicting on yourself.
Source: Jon Barron's Newsletter
CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com
Contact Us - Advertise - Stats
0.139 sec, (9)