Unalienable rights and "Man and Other Animals"

"They recognize and elevate humans above all other species."

While one may want to argue as to just how superior man should be to his fellow inhabitants of this planet, clearly our forefathers considered human beings special - and in the original organic republic of the United States of America human beings who were clearly declared in the Declaration of Independence to have God given unalienable rights which could not be infringed without their permission and those rights were subsequently protected by the Constitution.

Those rights still exist to this day, although many who seek to control the people and property of the world would have you believe otherwise.  Through unconstitutional laws and agencies who have created their own codes, the enemies of freedom have changed the way the United States operates from an organic federal republic, The United States of America, to a corporate UNITED STATES OF AMERICA who rules by corporate code and color of law administrative courts.  A right under our noses giveaway is the flying of the gold fringed Admiralty flag in our courts as a clear indicator that they are not operating under the United States Constitution.  As often as not, the courthouses also have the Masonic symbols that identify them as Masonic Temples (it is NO coincidence).

Perhaps the clearest example of how those who wield power view the citizens is in the phrase they have used repeatedly in their laws and codes: "man and other animals".  Instead of citizens who have unalienable rights, they would reduce us "man and other animals", no longer separate or superior, just an animal.

These corporate codes that are used as laws are not constitutinoal - the constitution clearly protects us from such restrictions and loss of rights the state has no buisness taking.  Such codes are no more than corporate memos and rules and they apply to us ONLY if we make a contract to agree to them, in essence a commercial contract.  However, that is where most of us are tricked.  The very act of obeying an agency rule or code gives them jurisdiction, because your act of obedience is taken as a signal of admitting to their jurisdiction.  If you apply for a license, sign an agreement, even appear in court or have correspondence with the court, you have agreed to the jurisdiction of the non-constitutional court and/or non-constitutional agency.  THAT is why no one goes to jail for failure to pay income tax - there is no law requiring it.  However, once you fill out a W-2, or once you eve file, you have agreed under penalty of law to file an accurate and full return each year.  As a result, you go to jail for failure to file or for perjury for failure to fully disclose all income.

It has been argued that merely reading an email from a state agency or court places your under their jurisdiction (in the Ben Taylor Utopia Silver case).  The other side of the coin is that knowing citizens could turn around and say that all such contracts are invalid due to lack of full disclosure by both sides. but few have the knowledge and money to try to negotiate a legal minefield rigged against you at every turn..

Remember - they only have jurisdiction if you give it to them.  As Mortimer J. Adler, noted American philosopher and educator, observed:  "What the state does not give away, it cannot take away."  In other words, since your rights are yours by birth. God given (or yours by the very nature of being a human being) and not bestowed by the state, the state may not take away those rights.  The state did not give you those rights, and they cannot take them from you unless you must freely give them away.

I bet Ohfor can enlighten us on the phrase and this subject in 10,000 words or more! (Just kidding, big guy - go for it!)