Re: You're right

All throughout history, all of the violent conflicts can be separated into political, economic, ideological, and philosophical, etc. groups (factions), and they have increased, in quality (severity) and quantity (there are thousands all over the world we don't know about).

The reason the number of violent conflicts has grown is that it has always been the norm to simply separate and classify these into categories for the sake of BLAME instead of simply realizing what the misunderstanding is and realize A JUST SOLUTION in order to prevent a repitition, and so we deny the fact that these VIOLENT conflicts are simply the natural outcome of NON-violent conflicts (militancy, nastiness, schemes/'head games', resentment/hatred, lying/cheating, etc. against each other).

A good example of modern militancy is the crucifixion of Eliot Spitzer (according to OBJECTIVE truth, the state simply cannot rightfully find/declare any absolute and valid truth (to the human race "What is TRUTH?") that he should recieve the penalty he was already given, so they stir the public to MILITANCY ("riots"/rebelliousness, the same at Jesus's crucifixion).

Scripture was designed so we can (if we prefer it as our priority), "point fingers" at factions as being "the perpetrators" instead of realizing that our own careless tendency to be militant is [a contributing factor to] violence.

Our tendency to want to villify and crucify, not only the innocent, but the purely just (even preferring to exonerate murderous Barabass over Jesus) still exists today.

So I wouldn't be too hard on the Muslims and the Catholics, 'human nature' is still the enemy (we contend with principalities of the heart, not satan himself).