CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Utimatte Zapper vs. Gamma Zapper.
 
ParaZapper Views: 4,726
Published: 16 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,095,121

Re: Utimatte Zapper vs. Gamma Zapper.


>- I think its up to the user to choose which zapper is the best. It is not fair to say yours the best when the customer prefer others than yours. I'm addressing in general.

I agree with this. The user should be able to make a choice from honest presentation of information. When a seller twists and misrepresentates the information that is available, it gives the entire industry a black eye.

One user's comments is not a small study.

As I have posted on previous occasions, I am sure that the UZ is a good zapper but it is certainly not the best. Dual frequencies will produce better results than a single frequency. Also, there is not much difference between 2000 Hz and 2500 Hz in reference to penetration, etc. zapping 10-20-10-20-10 will produce slightly better results than 7-20-7-20-7 will so I think that using a timer is a bad idea. This is just my opinion but it is formed based on real user data.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.188 sec, (1)