Re: On "Electro-magnetic Energy--NOT--(Radiation?)"
Energy Awareness Course
Use CureZone kode to get a free session!
Mercury Detox
Dental work and fillings, not a problem.
This is a reply to # 1,022,039
Re: On "Electro-magnetic Energy--NOT--(Radiation?)"
"the positive or negative attraction between two electromagnetically charged particles is analogous to the force of gravity."
What we are talking about here is particles that have been ionized by specific wavelengths of radiation. They obtain a charge and naturally will exert a force on each other proportional to q1q2/r^2. This has more to do with electrostatics than with EM radiation. It has nothing to do with what ML writes.
The same with your other quote
"The production of free radicals during mitochondrial respiration is part of a vital cellular process where electromagnetic energy (electron transport) is transformed into chemical energy through the production of a high-phosphate donor.............."
Again in this case, we have 1 specific ionized molecule transferring its charge onto other molecules. Nothing to do with what ML writes.
How can you talk about being blinded by word use. If ML is using the wrong words then he is not communicating the correct idea. Actually it is worse than that, because in most case he is just communicating nonsense. When you are talking about a basic, fundamental aspect of the physics we cannot rely on a poorly educated retiree to redefine all of physics to suit his insane ideas.
-
Expand this whole thread (11 messages)
On "Electro-magnetic Energy--NOT--(Radiation?)" Corinthian 17 y 2,344
CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com
Contact Us - Advertise - Stats
Copyright 1999 - 2024 www.curezone.org
0.063 sec, (1)