Personally, I would feel comfortable with anything under 10 parts per million , and at a pH of about 7.4. That's just me, but isn't it interesting that the alleged gurus who incessantly base their schemes of "body pH" management promote that people ought measure their urine and saliva pH, while neglecting the pH of the ocular fluid ? I find many things interesting that others don't , I suppose. V
So I’m a thinkin’ about what V said and try as I might I can’t think of any readings about pH AND taking a ph reading of the eye secretions.
But then I start pondering as my mind does and it tells me it would most likely be a waste of time.
After all, wouldn’t it maintain a proper pH almost as good as the blood to protect such a valuable asset?
Then my mind continues to ponder and starts wondering if dry eyes are in reality where the body doesn’t have the resources to give proper pH secretions to the eyes?
Then the damn thing continues and wonders if cataracts are due to acidic secretions as the body hasn’t the resources to adjust the pH?
Sigh....
I Google “pH +cataracts”.
Then “ph +cataracts -"ph.d"”
Then ph +cataracts -"ph.d" –“pd:”
Well that was dumb.
Then "ph reading" +cataracts
Finally, something usable.
Nope.
"ph level" +cataracts
Wait a sec, "ph level" +cataract
Duh.
So far, different pet breeds susceptibility to cataracts, “Identification and functional clustering of global gene expression differences between human age-related cataract and clear lenses” has indirect info on the Na+/H+ pump regulating the intracellular pH of lens epithelial cells. Trippy.
Doesn’t do us much good.
Here’s an interesting speculation on drug pH coinciding with V’s thought line:
DIFFERENCES IN FORMULATION
Vigamox is concentrated at 0.5%, and Zymar at 0.3%. The higher the concentration of the active fluoroquinolone in each drop, the greater the likelihood of the drug’s achieving larger concentrations throughout the ocular tissues. Additionally, Vigamox is formulated at a nearly neutral pH of 6.8, whereas Zymar has a pH of 6.0. This disparity can lead to significant differences in the solubility of the two agents at the normal ocular pH level near neutrality. These differences may explain why Vigamox achieves therapeutic concentrations at the target sites (cornea and aqueous) even against the fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens, whereas Zymar does not.
Ah, now this is why the pH of the skin as well as local resources may affect topical application of iodine:
I had a little tingling when putting the drops in my eyes, why?
Nu-Eyes is buffered to a neutral PH as are most eye drops. If the individuals PH level is highly acidic (diabetics are often very acidic) and/or if the individuals eyes are excessively tired and/or strained, (which can cause lactic acid), Dr. Babizhayev has stated that there might be a slight period of burning or tingling upon application.
So non matching pH’s can be a problem and pH of eye secretions can indeed be affected by health conditions.
Hummmm, diabetics are often very acidic.
Well, too much pondering for one day.
GS