The link between cat faeces and schizophrenia has been more firnly established, here are links to similiar stories:


Mysteries of the Mind

http://www.livescience.com/mind/


Mind Control by Parasites

http://www.livescience.com/scienceoffiction/060210_technovelgy.html


Scientists find stronger evidence for link between cat faeces and schizophrenia

http://www.imperial.ac.uk/P7349.htm


This [third one] says :
"Research published today in Procedings of the Royal Society B, shows how the invasion or replication of the parasite Toxoplasma gondii in rats may be inhibited by using anti-psychotic or mood stabilising drugs."

Other quotes from these links:
"... several of the medications used to treat schizophrenia have been shown to posess anti-parasitic and in particular anti-T.gondii properties. This led the authors to suspect that the anti-psychotic activity of these medications may be due to their inhibition of these parasites."
"When the rats were given Haloperidol, an anti-psychotic, and Valporic acid, a mood stabiliser, the behavioural symptoms of T.gondii were reduced. "
"It may be that anti-psychotic drugs work partly by parasite inhibition, and this could lead to new medicine and treatment combinations."
"The researchers have already begun human clinical trials using anti-T. gondii treatments as adjunct therapies for schizophrenia with researchers at Johns Hopkins University."

Karlin comments:
Therefore, the drugs are curiously affecting the parasites themselves. They were designed to relieve the symptoms of mental illnesses, but they kill parasites instead.

Do you suppose this could be how they discovered these drugs, that they kill parasites and therefore helps the mentally ill people, but they were marketted as something that addresses the brain chemistry of the mentally ill?

If so, it opens up a can of, errrr, worms. In that can are questions:

How likely could it be that drugs kill parasites unless they were designed to do that, as in the drug companies know that the mental illnesses common to humans are from pathogens like parasites, bacteria, viruses and toxins, but they do not want us to know that fact, or to know that they know the real causes of human mental illnesses and indeed a lot of other diseases of humans.

Why not? Why is it kept a secret? - because it would raise the question of "CTP OTS" - did the pharma giants CREATE these illnesses with pathogens, and then "not cure us" but instead only ease the symptoms somewhat with their expensive drugs? Also, all that money going to research was bogus - they just kept it or created useless jobs and someone skimmed off that money flow. Also, curing people of their chronic maladies would be a simple matter and people would be angry that the cure to their conditions were withheld, or at least avoided, cures that would be a straightforward removal of the pathogen, and avoidance of them would keep others from getting these illnesses.


So once more, I propose that the modern plague of illnesses and conditions that we are shoving 100s of billions of dollars worth of pills and surgery at every year, that plague is largely caused by pathogens like bacteria but we are not attacking those bacteria. Instead, we are just using pills to ease the symptoms of those illnesses caused by bacteria and so on.

And, of course, it would be possible so it is likely that when illnesses are caused by 'sneaky little pathogens', those illnesses could easily be CREATED by infecting people with bacterials, viri, parasites, etc. Simply encouraging people to have cats might be creating half our illnesses... putting living pathogens in our foods or our water would be easy to do.

This is all simple stuff, and it could have been used since about 1900 a.d. No high technology is needed, they were working with bacteria way back then... Nobody alive today even knows what life and health were like back before we were infected...