You failed to meet your own challenge; you have not proved that evolution is fraudulent.

 I can easily think of a dozen ways in which would falsify evolution.  If you understood evolution, you could too.   But you have not done so, you have just claimed it to be false, and deceptively shifted the burden of proof.

 Natural selection is the conversational term that is used to encompass a number of complex ideas.  So, “natural selection” is not one idea but a host of ideas and concepts.  And this has been proven in the lab hundreds of times.   Only the uninformed and uneducated would think that it has not been tested.  The concept has been tested and has proven itself true.   Next time use a science journal search engine and avoid looking foolish.

 The thinking man realizes that “billions of hours of thought” is equivalent to at least 233 THOUSAND years.

You have been proven wrong on every occasion you have posted.   You just keep rehashing the same old arguments.   If you look at the responses to your old posts, you will find your ideas fully and comprehensively refuted.   You are constantly provided with examples of evolution, your response is to claim they are wrong (though you never explain why) or to dismiss them outright.  No amount of proof will ever convince you.  Religion has hermitically sealed your mind against facts and ideas.   Until you free your mind from this prison, evidence will never matter to you.

Look up the references yourself.  Having someone point out your errors does not seem to work for you.  Perhaps self-education will prove more effective.

Oh, where to start?  (And why bother anyway?)  But . . .

Yes, super, I know you claim to know all about evolution because, as you once stated, you have read in excess of 40 books about it.  Do you even realize how absurd that assertion is?  What would you think of someone who claimed to know all about the history of the United States of America because they had read 40 books on the subject?  And that covers a period of time of less than 3 centuries.  Look at any half-way scholarly book JUST about the American Revolution; check the bibliography; you will find a lot more than 40 books.  But 40 books on evolution, covering millions of years (. . . okay, okay, for some it is just a matter of several thousand years; but even several thousand years certainly cannot be reasonably covered in 40 books), is satisfactory for you?  And when I suspect that all or most of them are anti-evolution books, the situation becomes even more ridiculous.  Have you ever considered reading any pro-evolution books, just to be at least a tiny bit informed on the matter?  Because, your challenge, as with most of your posts, shows a lack of understanding of basic scientific inquiry.