He did exactly the same with that mormon guy, name escapes me. First he gives a link with his implied approval (at the very least), then when I expose its falsehood, he disowns it.
As I said elsewhere, like trying to nail jelly to a tree.
If memory serves, the discussion was around Jesus' deity, which you (apparently) reject. You then posted a link to the article with the words 'this looks interesting' in a way that clearly implied support of your position.
Any unsuspecting reader who happened to stumble on the thread could be forgiven for believing that you approved of the message contained therein. At least, until I exposed its lies. If you did not agree with the author from the outset, it would have been a trivial matter for you to state as much in your preamble. Yet you failed to do so, then expected us to second guess your true motives for citing it.
A common theme running through your posts is the absence of any clarity. You seem to be tossed around by every wind of doctrine. Next time you read through your Bible, take those blinkers off so you can see what the authors are actually saying.