Speaking of jokes, how about you single atom shills promoting a product that is supposed to be composed of individual single atom particles when it is impossible to make such a product?
It is the single atom promoters who have never provided one iota of factual information. On the other hand, the disinformation has been plentiful - including the first single atom promoter who came on this forum claiming that the technology was revealed to him by aliens. He also claimed to be able to transmute lead into gold. See my post:
http://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2309722#i
ME offering no proof? OK, don't take my word for it, regardless of the years and hours I have spent researching colloidal and ionic silver and observing state of the art production facilities. Take this explanation from a scientist who worked for NASA and who produces true colloidal sillver with a facillty that cost over half a million dollars:
Ionic Silver Solutions:
The vast majority of products labeled and sold as colloidal silver fall into this category due to the low degree of manufacturing complexity and resulting low cost of production. The silver content in these products consists of both silver ions and silver particles. Typically, 90% of the silver content is in the form of ionic silver and the remaining 10% of the silver content is in the form of silver particles. The silver ions are produced by electrolysis and may be described as “dissolved silver”. Products produced by electrolysis are frequently described as "electro colloids". Because the majority of the silver content in these products is dissolved silver rather than metallic silver particles, it would be more technically accurate to describe these products as silver solutions.
Confusingly, ads for these products frequently claim that silver ions are small silver particles or describe the product as consisting of ionic silver particles. Silver ions are not the same as silver particles and the two terms are not interchangeable. Ionic silver is also referred to as monatomic silver and silver hydrosol by some producers who choose not to describe their products using the scientifically correct terminology. These are marketing terms used to hide the truth that what is being sold is an ionic silver solution.
You reveal either your lack of knowledge or your agenda - or both.
Silver ions can only be produced by chemicals? Anybody who know anything about ionic silver knows that silver ions are produced by simple electrolysis and no chemicals whatsoever are needed. Yes, ionic silver can be made chemically and there are a very small minority of manufacturers who make their silver solutions using chemicals, but not the vast majority. I think you know that but keep to your false propaganda about chemicals to promote your product.
Atomic particles? Maybe clusters of atoms could be described as atomic particles, but there are no single atom particles. All ionic particles are clusters of ionic silver atoms which have had electrons removed. There are NO single atom particles - and you won't reveal your "trade secret" manufacturing process because there is no process which can make single atom silver solutions..
Interesting that you mention plasma arcs, since the only true colloidal silver sollutions I know of are made with a plasma beam. To be specific, with a submerged, high voltage, reversing polarity plasma beam. So, I've shown you mine, how about you show me yours?
BTW, I have known and used the word shill for perhaps longer than you have been on the planet - and I know one when I see one when it comes to ionic and colloidal silver.
In ending, I will say once again that I have never said that your product does not work, just that it is not what it claims to be, contains far too high PPM and is too expensive.
There is virtually unanimous agreement within the scientific community and among true colloidal/ionic silver experts that it is impossible to produice single atom particles in silver solutions. If you say otherwise, then YOU prove it. Yes, ions are produced when electrons are stripped from atoms, but those atoms do not exist singly in solution but instead multiple atoms are joined together to form silver particles. How many atoms determines the size of the particles.
Likewise, there is virtually unanimous agreement that ionic silver is produced via electrolysis with no requirement whatsoever for chemicals. How do you explain all of the home generators and coimmercial products which produce mostly ionic silver with nothing except a generator, silver and water? What do you propose is in the mostly ionic silver I make at home with only those three items? Or in the superior true colloidal silver product I keep on hand which is made with nothing except ultra purified water, a high voltage generator, .9999 pure silver and a reversing polarity submerged plasma beam? I have personally obserrved the actual production of this product numerous times and nary a chemical to be found there.
Insofar as your touted chemical analysis, that is a self-serving analysis which was commissioned by the single atom producers which proves only the presence of ions and says nothing about particle sizes or composition. The makers of home generators and commercial ionic and colloidal silver have no need for such an analysis because it is common knowledge that electrolysis produces mostly ionic silver solutions - and plasma beam high voltage generators produce mostly colloidal silver..
This is getting boring and monotamous and I have better things to do than debate someone who regfuses to divulge their production methods, refuses to state their actual measured particle sizes, makes false claims that most ioniccolloidal silver is made with chemicalsmakes and makes claims about having single atom silver products but instead of providing proof instead asks the questioner to prove that he doesn't have such a product. Hardly the scientific method to claim that someone has made something and by way of proof ask others to prove that he doesn't have what he claims. Claims are only valid if the process and product are detailed so that they can be measured and duplicated - something we will surely never see from the single atom proponents.
If you cannot provide such proof then what you say can only be regarded as unproven speculation at best and spam at worst. Without such proof, which no single atom promoter has ever come close to providing, I expect that the moderator(s) of the forum and website will eventually take notice and remove the current crop of spammers and promoters as has happened time and again in the past.