RE: yes I admit, you add no chemicals, but yet chemicals are present why?

In Chemistry, terms such chemicals implies anything pertaining to change as a result of a process(or reaction). However it isn't common to identify the substance of chemical reactions as chemicals with the identification of elemental compounds. Such as; silver oxides or silver chloride etc. 

That being said, in the LVDC electrolytic process, the chemical process reducing atoms into elemental compounds(particles) takes place in the boundary layers of the anode and cathode respectively. Of which the anode which produces oxygen oxidizes the silver atoms and whereas the cathode which produces hydrogen reduces the silver atoms into silver nanoparticles. Therefore, the moment the silver atoms are liberated from the anode following the electron exchange, many of them will be converted to silver oxide(compound). Whereas those that make it within the cathod boundary layer are reduced into elemental silver particles(otherwise known as nanoparticles). A process that is often improved with the use of stirring(vortext).

Having said that, these are the accountable chemical elements that make-up the electrolytic process of LVDC colloidal silver production using distilled water, pure silver and DC current.  In continuing, I'd add that the potential for a single silver particle produced by reduction using this method, results in the smallest theoretical particle size possible. 

RE: The only thing I can conclude is that the LVDC CS generator is drawing them from contaminants in the air. if the-the unit is in an enclosed chamber, the air in the enclosed chamber (which may be contaminated with airborne pollutants)may be helping in generating the spark need to break down the nanoparticles and ions in the solution.

The problem with this theory is where the natural properties of air and water are a) none interchangeable and b) where the electrolysis process is an outward reaction. And so unless the air is somehow diffused and passed through the solution, there simply is no potential for it to break the surface tension and contaminate the solution under normal conditions.

RE: Still it would be great to get a certificate of analysis for your end product produced by your kit. (From and independent well-recognized testing facility).

I agree actually and I may follow-up on this in the near future for nothing more than for the sake of knowledge. Though I must add, that I couldn't call my CS generator a kit, given that I built it from scratch and that it looks just as bad as it sounds. That said, I have however gone through great lengths to get an accurate measure of the total silver in my own solutions by way of weight differentiation(anode) in conjuection with the calculation of time using the current and the coulombs of charge. Which seems to consistently hover at/or around 27ppm for my hybrid solution(superheated & rapid cooled) and 19 ppm for the conventional stuff. To which I'd add, I've had very good success with to date.

RE: Scientist know beyond a shadow of a doubt that when there are there is a color in the solution, it means it has gone through some chemical process.

This is true in fact, and in this case(without additives) the chemical process is electrolysis.

RE: While the LVDC CS is a better process from what other kit sellers market, it still produces nanoparticles, Ions, and chemicals

The discrepancy here is that you've separated the nanoparticles with the chemicals. When in truth, the nanoparticles are silver compounds. And so, the propper terminology here would be: Silver ions and nanoparticles. As the admission of chemicals implies a third substance, which simply isn't accurate. 

RE: Highly Reactive - So the solution is producing Hydrogen Peroxide? And not nitrogen? Well, that explains everything!

I've heard of mixing hydrogen peroxide with colloidal silver solutions in the past, though I personally wouldn't recommend it. 
That said, the author isn't saying he produced hydrogen peroxide with colloidal silver, but rather, where he mixed the two together as a concoction to cure an ear infection as shown here: http://www.curezone.org/art/read.asp?ID=58&db=5&C0=1 

RE: The colors in the LVDC CS is Hydrogen Peroxide!

Actually and you may find this to be of interest, the admission of hydrogen peroxide(drops)  in Colloidal Silver will turn it clear when colored. (car to guess why?)

RE: Do you still insist on misleading the readers into thinking that colors in the solution are the result of particle size?

I think this view would depend on several factors such as; whether or not you have a basic understanding of chemistry and more importantly whether you are properly disposed to interpret literary information(reading).

RE; Atomic Particle Colloidal Silver is the better choice between the two: For one, it has 500 to 19,999 PPM, it can even go further than that, but I am not aware of any instruments that measure about 19,999.

I can see where you'd think that. However, since we have no valid scientific method from which to conclude atomic particle silver solutions to be plausible, coupled with invalid reports and 3'rd party testing showing these to be false, then my guess is that such claims won't likely ever get off the ground for all but those lacking the knowledge to know better(victims). 

As for the PPM rating let us take a moment to consider the absurdity of the claim: 
Since we know that 1 PPM = 1 mg of elemental silver per Liter of solution.
We also know that 1000 PPM = 1 gram of silver per Liter.
Which therefore means that a 20 000 PPM solution would contain 20 grams of silver

Now I'm going to break out of character for a moment and ask if you've ever held 20 grams of silver in your hand? 
And while I realize you may not have a firm grasp on basic chemistry or even the process in which CS is made, I'd ask that you try and imagine what the dissolution rate of silver would be in order to realize such a solution? That is to say, what 20 grams of silver disolved looks like both during and after processing.

But it goes much further than this. The fact is, that under the perceived circumstances, we could easily substantiate this claim by evaporating said 20 000 PPM solution to effectively result in (give /or take) 20 grams of silver when all is said and done - care to try?  

The truth is, that there is no supporting evidence whatsoever(0) that these concentrations are either valid or even plausible under the current set of standards. And while industries(precious metals etc) have been dissolving metals into solution with far higher concentrations for centuries, I'd add that such processes make extensive use of chemicals(acids etc) and that the solutions are nowhere near being clear. In fact, the propper terminology here is pure toxic. 

And so, as you can imagine, claims such as these will likely only seem feasible for those who simply don't know better.
Whereas anyone with a capacity to read or experience for themselves what the process of electrolysis looks like, won't likely ever fall prey to such things. (sorry to say)

RE: Made with Pure Distilled Water the End Product Result: A CLEAR Colorless solution that has the same consistency of water which also means no chemicals are present (you can download a certificate of analysis from ALS Environmental that shows NO chemicals in the report from the GoldenGevity website).

You must have missed my comment on this, but there was chemical analysis or measure of metals on the report I reviewed for this product. - or did I miss something? 

RE: Then you have the particles size to consider, atomic size particles are tens of thousands of (if not hundreds of thousands) smaller than nanoparticles, the will slide right into a virus. That cannot be said of nanoparticles.

While I agree on the size of a silver atoms and the perceived surface area potential in vivo, I'd also add that neither you or the website selling these products have yet to demonstrate that are indeed what they are claimed to be. Which again, implies that these are merely falsely labled solutions as a result of a lack of understanding toward matters. 

RE: Can anyone guarantee that there are no chemicals in the LVDC CS?

Absolutely. In fact, that is the main advantage of making your own CS at home. 
That is to know exactly what's in the solution(composition). And so people such as myself, can most certainly state with confidence that there are no additives or chemicals in their solutions as a result of that. 

RE: Looking over the LVDC CS kits sellers none guarantee that the end product does not contain chemicals.

I wouldn't know, though I see no need to defend other peoples products personally.