Female hormones are critically dependent on iodine. Hormones in the woman originate in the ovaries, and ovaries require iodine to function properly:
* Our body requires both iodide (SSKI) AND iodine (lugols or iodoral)
Iodide (SSKI) is preferred by the following:
* Lungs
* Thyroid needs 3% prefers iodide
* Skin needs 20% and prefers iodide
* Salivary Glands prefer iodide
Iodine (Lugols) is preferred by the following:
* Muscles (650mg) and fat needs(700mg iodine) 70%
* Breast tissue needs 3-5 mg / day minimum and prefers iodine
* Prostate prefers iodine
* Stomach prefers iodine
* Ovaries prefer iodine
kidneys, spleen, liver, blood, & intestines can use either form
The entire body stores 1500 mg 1.5 gm total
"It’s no secret that iodine plays an important role in hormone production and has a special relationship with the thyroid. What’s discussed much less is that, for women, the ovaries contain the second highest concentration of iodine in her body (behind the thyroid). [1] Thus, it goes without saying that maintaining normal iodine levels is a must for promoting the health of the ovaries. This importance is compounded as research has linked iodine deficiency to polycystic ovary syndrome, also known as PCOS."
Much more here:
http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/iodine-polycystic-ovary-syn...
For much more Google search Ovaries Iodine or Hormones Iodine.
I suggest always using protection unless you are willing to get pregnant. It is sometimes difficult to know when an egg is formed.
How to get your iodine levels up to normal:
https://sites.google.com/site/iodinereferenes/iodine-support
For women, iodine also prevents fibrocystic breast disease, PCOS, Uterus Fibroids, thyroid & brain fog.
https://sites.google.com/site/iodinereferenes/home
See our Testimonials for more iodine cures: http://tinyurl.com/iodine-testimonials
Grizz
Hi Username,
I am very curious where you got the information that "Women used to mega dose on c to induce miscarriage/abortion back in the day?" I have studied the health applications of ascorbate extensively for the past 20 years, and have never heard of such a thing [nor any (legitimately documented) negative consequences from ingesting ascorbate]. If you could point me toward(s) your source(s), it would be much appreciated.
Thanks for any info,
David
Hi User,
I look forward very much to those links. Thanks.
Yes, I am in the United States.
Answering [definitely] about "liposomal C" is a difficult task! So much of the information posted is anecdotal from those who have a financial interest in it [unlike the many tens-of-thousands of positive studies using ascorbic acid, and (possibly) hundreds (if not thousands) using intravenous and injectable sodium ascorbate].
Here is a post I made on another Forum that may be of interest:
"Liposomal ascorbate very definitely has a place [I think primarily in place of (or in addition to) intravenous ascorbate], i.e. if one is [seriously] ill, it may just be a very good supplement to use. Additionally, when one is in a social setting, it has the advantage of no flatus production, etc. But, from my study of the matter, I would not want to completely replace daily Bowel Tolerance dosing [with ascorbic acid] with liposomal ascorbate.
Here are some points to consider [as to why]:
1) Liposomal ascorbate [just like intravenous ascorbate] provides no method of determining proper dosage [other than symptom amelioration], e.g. no Bowel Tolerance indicator. So, for daily health maintenance, one simply has to guess at one's needs. And as Dr. Cathcart put it, “I have seen enormous increases in bowel tolerance to ascorbate in adults, several hours before there was any outward sign of their getting sick.”
2) Along the same line: It therefore provides NO GI tract cleansing, something I have come to the conclusion is extremely important to one's overall, long-term health prospects.
3) If one has any blood-born malady, the liposomal may not work as well, because it primarily stays intact until it reaches the cells. Personally, I want the ascorbate to be able to attack and neutralize any toxins/poisons/parasites, etc., while they are still in the blood, i.e. vs. having already made it into the [tissue] cells.
4) While it is true that liposomes, being fatty molecules, can directly cross the [fatty] cell membrane “barriers” [whereas water-soluble substances, like ascorbic acid, cannot], ascorbic acid reduces and re-reduces, i.e. continually “recharges,” all natural [antioxidant] substances that do operate within the cells, e.g. vitamin E and glutathione [to name just two].
5) The animals all produce the water-soluble substance ascorbic acid [vs. any fat-soluble substance] to handle their ascorbate needs throughout their bodies [including within their cells].
6) Liposomal ascorbate [at least commercially] costs on the order of 50 to 100 times as much per gram as ascorbic acid.
I think, liposomal ascorbate is a fantastic discovery/invention! But as a 100% replacement to daily Bowel Tolerance dosing with ascorbic acid, I certainly do believe it has its drawbacks and limitations [per the above].
I think its use is primarily as an adjunct therapy. Note this from Dr. Levy, '...I have seen many cancers now respond dramatically and/or completely resolve with IVC, sodium ascorbate powder chronically pushed to bowel tolerance, and relatively low doses of liposome-encapsulated vitamin C (3 to 6 grams/packets daily). All these forms of vitamin C as monotherapy have achieved these dramatic results. That said, the more forms you take of vitamin C, in the highest tolerable/affordable doses, the better.'
So if the circumstances warrant, I think liposomal ascorbate makes a good addition to, versus a good replacement of, ascorbic acid."
Additionally, User, there is much controversy over whether "homemade" liposomal ascorbate is composed of true liposomes, e.g. molecules in the under 200 nanogram size. Apparently, for liposomes to easily cross the cell membrane barrier, the smaller the better.
For myself, User, after 20 years of daily Bowel Tolerance dosing with ascorbic acid [currently in the 75 grams per day range], I simply have no need for liposomal ascorbate. But, for most people, who's GI tracts are not generally all that healthy, e.g. cleaned out/up, I think liposomal ascorbate can be a real life-saver when faced with serious illness, i.e. since liposomal ascorbate does not generally have a Bowel Tolerance reaction, and therefore, "limit," one [typically] would be able to ingest therapeutically significant doses without having one's GI tract [cleanness/unencumberedness] be a limiting factor.
I hope that helps, User, as "grist for your [health] mill."
Best wishes,
David
David,
I'm so glad you showed up. Can you recommend a Sodium Ascorbate liquid that I can take?
I found this one at Amazon.Com: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G7QLMM/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
Does this look OK? I've got an order in my basket ready to go on your word.
The pills get caught in my throat & have trouble going down.
Many thanks,
Grizz
Hi Grizz,
By far the least expensive way to get a sodium ascorbate solution, is just to mix one part sodium bicarbonate, i.e. baking soda, with two to three parts of ascorbic acid powder/crystals [and then wait for the bubbling/fizzing to stop]. From my view, the more ascorbic acid [percentage-wise], the more potent [health-wise] the solution.
You're most welcome [as always], Grizz.
Good health to us all,
David