An Update On Our Evolution
By Chris Thomas
The Situation Post 21/12/12
Many people have asked me for an update of our situation following the passing of the 21st of December 2012 “deadline”. This essay is not intended to be a full update as not all of the information is yet available to carry out a full assessment of where we are and what exactly happened on the day. However, two things are already very clear:
1. The reason for so few people undergoing soul re-integration is as a result of human lack of belief in themselves. I am not going to explore this aspect in full as this will be the subject of a future essay.
2. Given that there were so few completions on that date, those who would re-shape the world into their view of a “New World Order” have stepped up their plans of moving people in directions that the NWO wish to go whilst totally ignoring the choices of the people.
It is this second situation that I would mainly like to explore in this essay and in doing so will highlight many of the reasons for the seeming “failure” of so many to re-integrate.
New World Order?
This is a term that has been used by most leading politicians, as well as many others, in recent years. However, not everybody is familiar with the term and certainly not with its implications. Think of Aldous Huxley's novel “1984” and that will give you some idea of what the term “New World Order” means. Essentially, the plan is to create a one world government, a one world bank and a one world police force. A central government that rules the world and enforces its policies with a police force under its direct control. Is this a bad thing?
Well think about the governments we currently have. Are they honest? Do they carry out “the will of the people”? Do they treat all of their citizens equally? Most people would answer no to all of those questions. Imagine all of the political corruption there would be if there was only one world government – if you were a part of, or favoured by, that government, you would be allowed to get away with virtually anything. If you were not favoured by the government, you would be made to suffer or even be imprisoned.
There are far too many examples of these kinds of behaviour in the world today by individual governments. The only thing that holds back their, sometimes, extreme behaviour is the reactions of other individual governments. Without those individual governments expressing their views, the one world government could do as it pleases without hindrance.
But would this one world government actually be there to carry out the wishes of the electorate or would it be under the control of what has become known as “the industrial/military complex”?
At the time of writing, a bill is passing through the American government that has been written by the GMO company Monsanto. Known as the Monsanto Protection Act, it gives the company total immunity from all health and environmental controls that are currently in place in America. Monsanto are looking to be able to plant any
genetically modified organism (GMO) anywhere it chooses on American soil with total immunity from any current or future environmental law.
At the time of writing, “Monsanto's Law” has been passed by the American Congress and is headed towards the American Senate where it is anticipated it will pass without change. Then we have the situation in Guantanamo Bay prison. Both President GW Bush and President Obama have granted pardons to more than half of the prisoners held at Guantanamo as they have been proven to have no connections to any terrorist organisations.
The Presidential Orders further state that the prisoners who have been granted pardons be repatriated to their home countries. The military controllers of Guantanamo have ignored both Presidents, locked down the prison and refused access to the prisoner's legal representatives and stopped commercial flights into the area. The prisoners have responded by going on hunger strike and this hunger strike has had a news blackout as it has not been reported in the western media.
We have all seen the recent banking situation in Cyprus. Due to EU and government policies, the banking system in Cyprus is in a state of dire collapse. The European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund have stepped in with a rescue package of measures. The first thing they did was to reduce the level of state benefits to pensioners, the disabled etc by twenty percent and halt the spending on government projects. They then close the banks, preventing people from accessing their own money.
They insist on a one-off tax of ten percent of all the money individuals hold in their bank deposit accounts. When this causes riots, they modify this tax to taking ten percent, but could be up to eighty per cent, of the accounts that hold more than one hundred thousand Euros. The Bank of Cyprus collapses because of the activities of the European Central Bank, International Monetary Fund and the Cyprus government and who pays the price for it?
Ordinary people who have tried to generate some savings against a rainy day. Most people now see this as the model for future bank bailouts. We have already had situations where governments gave the banks many millions of taxpayer's money but next time the banks deliberately mess up the economy, they will plunder our savings accounts.
At the time of writing, I have heard strong rumours that the Canadian government is looking to pass a law that gives them the powers to act in the same way as the Cyprus government is acting when future problems arise in the banks in Canada. Imagine how safe your savings would be if there was only a one world bank? Would the people of the world have a fair voice under a one world government? It would seem to be extremely unlikely.
So what mechanisms are being used to bring about a one world government – the NWO?
Agenda 21
Here‟s a recent news item:
“On February 27th [2013], the European Commission published a document announcing it will take on itself a “lead role” in global environmental governance through “a unified policy framework” – in effect aligning itself with Agenda 21. In the thirty page document titled “A Decent Life For All” the EC says it aspires to a “leading role” in an “overarching framework” towards global governance. ...”
Agenda 21 is part of a much larger document that was agreed and signed into law in something over one hundred countries. Agenda 21 arose from the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. The agreements forged at the summit include the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21. The Biodiversity Treaty seeks to prevent the further loss of species from the planet and to halt the current rate of plant and animal extinctions.
Agenda 21 deals with people and environmental matters on a much larger scale than the Biodiversity Treaty. It is called “Agenda 21” because its requirements are to fully implemented before the year 2100. The two main requirements of Agenda 21 are:
1. Fifty per cent of all land be designated as wildlife refuges allowing the indigenous plants and animals to recover and regain their original habitats.
2. The wealth of western countries be more equally distributed amongst third world
countries.
An environmentalist's dream situation.
Except. How do you return fifty percent of the land back to nature when most of it is inhabited by people?
Simple, you remove the people. How can a country produce enough food to feed its population if fifty percent of the land is taken out of food production? Simple, the people starve. To quote a statement attributed to the environmentalist and deep sea explorer, Jacques Cousteau, who was at the UNCED conference:
“In order to stabilise world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”--Jacques Cousteau
Written into Agenda 21 is the requirement that “the world's population be reduced to a manageable 500 million”. When you bear in mind that the official global population at the end of 2012 was 7,000,000,000 (seven billion), Jacques Cousteau's figures look a little light. In addition the main proposal for achieving the target of returning fifty percent of the land to wildlife is to remove people off the land and force them to move into cities.
This process has already begun in some countries. This is achieved by removing government financial support to rural towns and villages and closing off local access to motorways and freeways. The local economy collapses and people are forced to move away from their homes and into larger towns and cities for work. Once the small town or village is empty, it is demolished to prevent anyone from returning and living there. This is already happening in some countries.
Given these actions and the stated aim of reducing the global population to “a manageable 500 million”, it is not so much Huxley's 1984 but the nineteen fifty's Charlton Heston movie “Soylent Green”. The plans of The New World Order and Agenda 21 have been in place for more than twenty years and yet, until recently, very few people were aware of these plans or of their implications. There are two reasons for this:
1. The media is complicit in a cover-up.
2. Most people don‟t want to think about it. After all, if they thought about it, they would have to do something.
We will return to the media later. But let us take a look at the second reason.
Lack of Completions
At the end of 2012, many people were baffled as to why they had not undergone soul re-integration: after all, they said they were ready and they wanted to do it so why didn't they?
The answer is to do with how we see our world and our place within it – the “mindset” we adopt to undergo our everyday lives. We, in the West, have become brainwashed into believing that our lifestyles are the best there are and that this Western lifestyle should be adopted by the non-western world. But if we go to the Akashic and look at the percentages of people who were actually ready to undergo soul re-integration, as opposed to those who said they were ready, we find a very different picture.
In the West, an average of sixty percent of the population claimed to have been ready whereas on the day, that figure, in some Western countries, was actually about one percent. In most non-western countries, the percentage of those who were actually ready to undergo soul re-integration was as high as ninety eight percent. (Only about five hundred thousand people actually completed re-integration on the day and these were all from non-western countries. The reason for so small a number in the non-western countries is because those people adhered to the collective decision to undergo re-integration en masse. That is, we all re-integrated together – both Western and non-western people at the same time.)
The problem with Western countries is that we do not see the larger picture. We have become bogged down in our technological lifestyles to the point where we cannot even sense the energy patterns that those of the non-western countries see as a part of their everyday lives. We have become brainwashed into ways of thinking and acting that remove us away from the natural patterns of life and so we have a problem in properly understanding ourselves let alone the cycles of the Earth. What we need to do, to achieve our part of the re-integration agreement, is to alter the way in which we think.
As Einstein put it:
“The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them.”
In other words; in order to achieve our goal of soul re-integration, we must begin to think on a different level. If we had achieved mass soul re-integration, the plans and schemes of the New World Order and their Agenda 21 would have been stopped in its tracks as we would have risen above their mind control and political engineering.
So how do we start to think on a different level?
The first step is to realise that we have been brainwashed. Once we begin to realise that, we can then begin to investigate the reasons why we think in the way in which we do and begin to undo much of the brainwashing and move onto a new level of thought.
Science
One of the main regions of our lives where we have been deliberately misled is with science. In many respects, the world, and its place within this Universe, is too large a topic for us to consider especially when we have the day to day running of our lives to take care of. Quantum physics is not the usual topic of conversation in the pub. So we rely on those who have set themselves up as experts and we listen to what they have to say.
The thing to bear in mind about scientists is that they have their own biases and agendas. For example: In the Victorian era (when most of our current scientific thinking was set in stone) most scientists believed absolutely that if a woman attempted to solve problems in higher mathematics, her brain would explode – I kid you not.
The problem with science is that it operates on two main levels: there is the public face of science and then there is the reality of the control that science is under and rigorously imposes upon itself.
“It is intriguing to note that the views of scientists like Tardieu, Stern and Susman, though appearing in scientific journals, are rarely encountered in popular presentations or general textbooks. This points to the existence of a pattern of knowledge filtration in the scientific community that tends, consciously or unconsciously, to suppress information that would complicate the relatively simple picture of human evolution presented to the public in general and to students at all levels of the educational system...”1
I have spent about 35 years actively researching within the Akashic trying to find the truth about human history but I have spent more years than that investigating science, in all of its fields. The main conclusion I have reached from all of the scientific literature I have read is that science is following an agenda.
The public face of science is that which somebody wants us to see and that there are fundamental flaws in even the everyday science we are taught at schools. These flaws and untruths become perpetuated, even by scientists, and so it can be difficult to arrive at an actual truth. The other problem with science is that there is very little proof of anything – all there are is theories. The amount of scientific theory that can be proven could be written on the back of an envelope. Despite this lack of proof, the scientific community proclaims its supposed knowledge with great confidence and arrogance and, unless we research these claims for ourselves, we have no method by which we can counter these scientific claims; we tend to accept them and move on.
When I have given talks about the information within the Akashic, there is usually one moron in the audience who asks in a very supercilious fashion: “Is there any scientific proof for what you are saying?” The answer is: Is there any proof of science?
To give an example of what I mean. Let us look at one of the most fundamental theories that scientists claim is absolute – gravity.
Gravity
We all know the story of gravity: Sir Isaac Newton was sitting in his garden one day in the 17 Century when an apple fell on his head. “Ouch, 'tis gravity”, said Newton. Well that‟s not exactly an accurate picture of how Newton theorised about gravity but it is how most school children like to think about it.
What Newton actually theorised was that the gravitational pull of any two objects is:
“Proportional to the mass of each and varies inversely as the square of the distance between them.”
In other words, all objects, including people, generate a gravitational pull on each other that reduces the further apart those objects or people are. The Earth exerts a gravitational pull on the apple and, in return, the apple exerts a gravitational pull on the Earth. But, as the Earth has a far larger mass than the apple, the apple falls towards the Earth. In return, the apple also pulls the Earth towards it but only by an infinitesimal amount.
This theory of how gravity works, and what it is, has predominated science for four hundred years. Many scientists are now moving away from this concept of gravity and are beginning to realise that the Universe is not held together by gravity but by electro-magnetic forces. Many cosmologists now actually see these electro-magnetic forces as the 5th dimension – time being the 4th dimension. (Note: this is not the 5th dimension that Velon controlled channelled messages have been trying to fool us into believing. The Velon version of the 5th dimension doesn't exist anywhere or anywhen.) To understand why electro-magnetic forces are stronger than gravity, here's an experiment you can try at home.
For this experiment you will need a child's magnet (it doesn't matter if it is a bar magnet or a horseshoe magnet), a household nail and a flat surface. Place the nail on the flat surface and take the magnet into your hand. From a point directly above the nail, bring the hand holding the magnet slowly down towards the nail. When you are within 2 to 3 centimetres of the nail, it will suddenly leap from the surface and onto the magnet.
What this shows is that the magnetic force is powerful enough to lift the mass of the nail off the surface a few centimetres without touching it. It also shows that your child's magnet is powerful enough to overcome the Earth's gravitational pull on the nail. It is also worth noting that if you lift the nail off the surface with your hand, you can lift it easily. In comparison, it is far more difficult to lift the nail from the magnet.
Another example of why gravity does not exist is to do with the moon. Through popular science, we know that the moon is held in its orbit by the Earth's gravitational pull. In turn, the moon exerts a gravitational pull on the Earth resulting in variations in tidal patterns in the sea (most women are also affected by the moon's cycles).
When NASA (North American Space Agency) was blasting astronauts into orbit above the Earth's atmosphere, the astronauts entered a field of zero gravity. When the international space station was in orbit, the scientists claimed that they wanted to carry out experiments that could not be carried out on the Earth's surface as they needed to be carried out in zero gravity.
If the moon was held in place by the Earth's gravitational field, the astronauts would not be in zero gravity until they were in an orbit beyond the moon. In other words, the moon is not held in place by gravity. So what does hold the moon in its orbit around the Earth? How does the moon affect the tides? Or for that matter, what holds the Earth and the other planets of the solar system in orbit around the sun? Or the solar system in orbit around the galaxy? Or the galaxy in its place in the Universe?
Electro-magnetic energies.
Or at least, that is the scientific name for the forces involved. Another name for electro-magnetic forces would be consciousness. In recent years, many, many cosmologists have begun to think of the Universe as conscious. This new explanation has arisen from experiments in quantum physics where the way in which the experimenter thinks the experiment is going to turn out determines the actual result.
For the Universe to exist there must have been some kind of conscious thought that brought it into being. Not all cosmologists are happy with this concept as it brings it too close to religious beliefs in God. But many are and their numbers are growing.
So why does the adherence to Newton's 400 year old theory of gravity persist?
Currently, the mainstream scientific view is that somewhere between 13 and 14 billion years ago there was a “Big Bang”. This Big Bang came out of nowhere, it was a spontaneous act derived from a single point in space (a “singularity”). As this Big Bang expanded, it somehow generated all of the energy and all of the matter (solid material) that makes up our Universe.
As the Big Bang continued to expand, the density of the matter began to form gravity and it is the gravitational pull of this matter that limits the size of our Universe – too much gravity and the Universe would have collapsed before it began; too little gravity and it would have continued to expand outwards indefinitely without forming the
Universe – it had to be the exact amount of gravity at exactly the right time and exactly in the right place for the Universe to form.
But then scientists began to use telescopes and began to map the galaxies that are contained within our Universe. They realised that there were an insufficient number of galaxies, and other massive objects, in the Universe to satisfy the requirements of their gravitational model. So they sat down and came up with the idea of Cold Dark Matter (CDM). CDM cannot be seen nor can it be measured nor can it be weighed, it only theoretically exists in theoretical quantities. But even with their theorising, and the calculations they carried out to arrive at a collective mass for CDM, they could not find enough of it.
Then they came up with the idea of Cold Dark Energy (CDE). Again, CDE cannot be seen nor can it be measured nor can it be weighed, it only theoretically exists in theoretical quantities. In order for this “Double Dark” theory to work, there must be a fundamental particle that converts CDE into CDM. This particle was theorised by a Scottish scientist called Peter Higgs and has become known as the “Higgs boson” (there are also WIMPS – Weakly Interacting Mass Particles; and MACHOS – Massive Compact Halo Objects).
What the Higgs boson is supposed to do is travel around the Universe and, when it happens to collide with some theoretical CDE it magically converts it to theoretical CDM generating an extra lump of theoretical mass. Trillions of dollars and have been spent on building larger and larger particle colliders, and millions per year in running costs, in an attempt to track down this theoretical particle that makes Big Bang and gravity theory work. In 2012, there was a big fuss made that the Hadron Collider at Cern, on the Swiss French border, had finally tracked down a Higgs boson. Everyone cheered until the scientists at Cern realised that they didn't have a Higgs boson at all: it was just yet another sub-atomic particle.
Many, many scientists believe that the Big Bang did not happen, that gravity does not exist and that the Higgs boson does not exist: Summing up all of these theoretical particles and interactions as DUNNOS – Dark Unknown Non-detectable Objects Some-where.
A group of these scientists held a conference in New York in 2004 and made a press release (this press release was not widely published as the statement went against the prevailing view):
“Big Bang Theory relies on a growing number of...things we have never observed. Inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent. Without them there would be fatal contradictions between the observations...and the predictions... In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted...what‟s more, the Big Bang Theory can boast of no qualitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation...”
So why does the Big Bang theory and the theory of gravity persist?
Here's a clue:
One of the chief proponents of Big Bang and Double Dark theory is Dr Joel Primack. In 2008, he and a colleague, Dr Nancy Adams, undertook a world tour giving lectures at institutes in a number of countries. In these lectures, Drs Primack and Adams proposed an interesting suggestion.2 Their lectures begin with a very inaccurate story of the beliefs of ancient Egyptians.
Essentially they claimed that the ancient Egyptians had religious beliefs based on their understanding of cosmology – the stars they could see in the heavens. The Egyptian belief structure maintained that as long as the people continued to believe in the gods of the cosmos and how they held up the heavens, the skies and stars would stay in their place. If the people stopped believing in their gods of the cosmos, the sky would fall and crush everyone to death.
Virtually none of that is true but Primack and Adams used it as a prelude to their proposals that modern man should bring about a new religion, using the ancient Egyptian as a model, where the central tenets of this cosmology and anthropology-based religion should be based on the Big Bang theory and Double Dark theory; presumably with cosmologists like Primack and Adams as its “high priests”.
During the presentation of the three lectures that I have seen, they blatantly use symbolism connected to Freemasonry. They further go on to propose that this new cosmologically-based religion form a fundamental part of “the New World Order”. Horror is the best word I can think of to describe my reaction to Primack and Adams‟
lectures.
___
But gravity is not the only scientific theory that requires that we totally change the way we think about, not only science, but ourselves.
Human Origins
Huge amounts of material have been written about our origins. If you visit any natural history museum anywhere in the world, you will encounter the same story usually in 3D with voice-overs or set displays using hairy models. The popular scientific version is this:
Sometime about 3.5million years ago, an ape descended from the African trees and began to walk upright. As these apes began to spend more and more time on the ground, they became less and less ape-like and more and more human-like. The first set of fossils to be found was of an early human (non-ape) who has become known as “Lucy” and that similar fossils to Lucy's indicate “The First Family”.
When these fossils came to light in the early 1970's, there was a great deal of celebration that the first humans had been found in Africa. In the 1980's scientists proved that Lucy and The First Family were not of a human lineage and it all went quiet in the field of serious science but it remains as the accepted story in popular science.
Here is the story of Lucy and The First Family.3 Both Lucy and The First Family have been given the scientific name of: Australopithecus Afarensis (this name means: Australo – southern. Pithecus – ape. Afarensis – the region of Ethiopia where the fossils were found.
The first finds were in 1973 in the Ethiopian region of Afar, near to the city of Hadar. These finds were of a partial thigh bone (femur) and a partial shin bone (tibia). Both were lying near to each other on the surface. It was assumed that both bones belonged to the same individual but nobody knows for certain as the bones are fossilised therefore DNA cannot be extracted. The finder was Dr Donald Johanson. The two bones became known as the Hadar Knee and designated as AL 129. The knee joint is what is known as a valgus knee – this is where the top of the femur, where it joins the hip, is outside of the line of the knee. In African apes, the femur rises straight from the knee to the hip. Johanson claimed that this angle of joint (15 degrees) proves that it must have been human or, at least, a transitionery phase between apes and humans. However, no adult human has a joint angle this great; the average human joint angle is 9 degrees. The extreme angle of the joint could be explained if the bones of the joint came from different individuals.
Dr Johanson either did not know, or chose to ignore, the fact that both orangutans and spider monkeys have valgus knees. Analysis of the joint by many leading anthropologists and paleoanthropologists (Tardieu, Stern and Suzman plus many others) in the late 1970's and early 1980's all conclude that this knee joint was more closely associated with an early form of orangutan rather than an early human. In 1974, Johanson returned to Hadar and found a number of bones from what was assumed to be the same skeleton in a gully. This skeleton became known as “Lucy”.
A combination of potassium-argon, fission track and paleomagnetic dating techniques were used on them and Johanson determined that Lucy was 3.5 million years old. In 1975, Dr Johanson went back to Hadar and found the fossil remains of 13 hominids, men women and children, of the same age as the bones of Lucy. The collection of skeletal remains Johanson called “The First Family”. Very detailed analysis of these skeletons by a number of leading anthropologists during the late 70's and early 80's (but also ongoing) all conclude that both Lucy and The First Family were not the remains of early humans but were of a type of early orangutan that climbed trees and walked along the branches.
The reconstruction of one of the skulls found as part of The First Family gave very gorilla-like characteristics that were very similar to Australopithecus africanus. The conclusion of the scientists involved was that neither Lucy nor The First Family were part of the human (Homo) lineage but were Australopithecines – a group of monkey-like creatures. Only Johanson claims that Lucy and The First Family are Hominids (early humans) but he is supported by the scientific mainstream as it goes along with the view they want to present. However, not all scientists agree with this view. In science, it is all in the name. All branches of science have a committee that determines the categories by which a new “find” is listed. If Lucy and The First Family were considered to be the first of the human lineage, then the name they would have been allocated would have been “Ethiopian Man” or “Hadar Man” in the same way as Neanderthal Man (found in the Neanderthal Valley in Germany) or Peking Man (found near to Peking in China). Then they would have been granted a scientific name beginning with the Latin translation of the word man – Homo – as in Homo Erectus (Upright Man) or Homo Habilis (Handy Man).
Johanson did apply for Lucy and The First Family to be given a “Homo” classification but his application was denied and the classification of Australopithecus Afarensis stands. In other words, Lucy and The First Family are considered to be not the first humans but Australopithecines – early forms of apes whose closest descendents are orangutan. And yet the myth persists, in the popular science as presented to the public, that Lucy and The First Family were our ancestors and they originated in Africa.
Given that the scientific world does not believe that these fossils are of our ancestors, why did the BBC TV show a documentary in 2012 claiming that Dr Johanson's views were correct?
The answer is that there is a need to prove that humans originate in Africa.
Human Development & Migration
Why is there a need to prove that humans first developed in Africa?
We will come onto that later.
In the meantime, let us look at another popular myth about human development. The accepted popular scientific view is that human life developed in Africa sometime around three and a half million years ago. The region of Africa where humans began is rarely specified, just speculated upon. About two and a half million years ago, some
of these early humans (probably Homo Erectus although the actual existence of Homo Erectus as a distinct evolutionary step is greatly doubted by paleoanthropologists) migrated from Africa and spread out across the globe, particularly into Europe and Asia where they became Neanderthal Man and Peking Man.
Sometime around one hundred thousand years ago, there was a second wave of migrations out of Africa, this time the migrants being Cro-Magnon Man (also known as Homo Sapien) who also spread out across Europe and Asia where peoples from both migrations apparently lived in harmony – or not as the case may be as it is dependent
on speculation rather than any facts.
Then about thirteen thousand years ago – at the peak of the last ice age – there was a further migration north and east where Cro-Magnon Man traversed the ice bridge between Russia and Alaska gradually making their way all the way down to South America somewhere about eleven thousand years ago. Except; the proof is against this theory as is the common sense.
Regardless of any evidence, think about that situation for a minute... You are living in your nice warm cave where you know your local surroundings – all of the water holes and rivers and all of the game trails are well known to you. You know where and when to pick plants, nuts and berries. Why would you take it into your head to leave your home and travel many thousands of miles into totally unknown territory especially as you would have to fight blizzards and climb glaciers several miles high? Not only that, you would have to endure temperatures many degrees below freezing, no food sources, no water sources, no heat sources, not even trees for firewood and no shelter.
Even if you did have some idea of where you were headed, it would still be an unbelievably risky and foolhardy trip to take especially as the end destination was totally unknown to you. Even animals, who are meant to have a lower level of intelligence to humans, do not undertake journeys of that nature – they know better. So what evidence is there to show that the accepted version is incorrect?
A great deal and virtually all of it is deliberately hidden away so that it does not become public knowledge. Here is one example from the many I could have included.
Lake Huron (One of the American/Canadian Great Lakes)
Between 1951 and 1955 an anthropologist at the National Museum of Canada, Thomas E Lee, excavated a site known as Sheguiandah on Manitoulin Island in northern Lake Huron where he found a number of flint and stone tools that had obviously been worked by man4. The area of The Great Lakes is thought to have undergone a series of glaciations between 10,000 and 70,000 years ago. The stone artefacts that Lee found were in several of the stratified layers, from just below the surface (the most recent deposits); within the glacial till (middle date deposits) as well as under the first layer of glacial till (the oldest deposits).
In his excavations, Lee used the “best practice” techniques recommended by anthropology at the time. Not only did he excavate extremely carefully, recording in minute detail every find in every layer, he called on a number of experts in different fields, particularly geology, to confirm his findings and their dates. The oldest artefacts were dated at being around 150,000 years old. This date being agreed by all of the expert scientists involved.
However, it was known that dating artefacts in this range would cause considerable difficulties as the scientific consensus view was that no artefact in North America could be older than 12,000 years. To try and mollify the scientific world, Lee's team put a date of “at least” 30,000 years old in their final report. The response from the “powers that be” in science was immediate. The head of the University of Canada was instructed to sack Lee. When the head refused, he was himself sacked. Lee's original papers were not published at the time as no scientific journal would publish them. The artefacts found on the site were confiscated and then disappeared.
Lee refused to leave the university and was only allowed to do menial jobs for the next eight years whilst he struggled against the scientific world to get his findings published. He eventually resigned and set up his own scientific journal where he published his findings (Anthropological Journal of Canada). His publication was ostracised by the scientific community and everything written by Lee was ignored or pilloried.
The Sheguiandah site was shut down and nobody else was allowed to visit it. Whilst a very few references to the site appear in scientific literature, those that do claim it can be no more then 12,000 years old. All of the painstaking work by Lee's team is ignored in order to satisfy the belief that North America was not colonised before the end of the last Ice Age: 12,000 years ago.
But the treatment of Lee is far from unique. Many, many scientists, archaeologists, anthropologists and paleoanthropologists have found their research and findings removed from the scientific records and their careers brought to a premature halt no matter what their reputation was before they dared to try to publish any material that differed from the main stream scientific view.
There are a large number of archaeological finds in Canada, North America and Mexicothat show human activities (the shaping of stool tools) has been carried out for at least 250,000 years. All of these finds have been deliberately “lost” and the records of the paleoanthropologists suppressed and their reputations and careers shot to ribbons. Some of the most significant finds are buried so deep that they are never discussed.
But one fact stands out most of all: the remains and other evidence of the existence of Cro-Magnon Man (Homo Sapien) living on Earth about 3.5 million years ago is to be found on every continent. In other words, humans did not originate in Africa but world-wide and at the same time.
“...we conclude that the total evidence, including fossil bones and artefacts, is most consistent with the view that anatomically modern humans have coexisted with other primates for tens of millions of years.”5
Not only is there overwhelming evidence that “modern man” lived on every continent the evidence that they were extremely advanced is also overwhelming. By advanced I mean that some of their understanding of the world and the stars were in advance of our own current understanding of these matters.
I have covered some of these scientific findings in my previous books, especially “The Human Soul” and “Project Human Extinction” and so will only briefly mention some of the findings here. Objects that archaeologists identified as “glass table ornaments” found in ancient Sumeria and dated to at least 5,000 years old turned out to be optical lenses that are so advanced that the design of these lenses is more advanced than current lens design. The Sumerian lenses contain “pockets” in the glass that can be filled with various gasses that means that the focal length can be altered to suit virtually any focus requirements. These lenses can be used both as microscopes and telescopes just by altering the gas pressure inside the lens “pockets”.
___
An engineer called Professor Alexander Thom surveyed many hundreds of stone circles and stone monuments in Britain, Ireland and Europe during the 1950s and 1960s. His surveys were accurate to tolerances of less than one millimetre. From his surveys, Prof. Thom concluded that the people who had built the circles and monuments used Pythagorean geometry to construct them and used a standard means of measurement called the “megalithic yard”. Prof. Thom also realised that the stone circles and monuments were aligned to either stars or sun rise/sun set at critical times of the year and so was the inventor of Archaeo-astronomy.
The problem is that the Celtic peoples who built these stone circles and monuments did so at least two thousand years before Pythagoras was born. Prof. Thom‟s findings did not make him popular amongst either archaeologists or scientists as he proved beyond doubt that people of the ancient world were considerably more advanced than anyone wanted to consider and so his work was ignored and never spoken of.
___
The megalithic yard is also to be found as the standard measuring length across the ancient world – by 'ancient' I mean before at least three thousand years BC. An identical measurement was used by the Ancient Sumerians where they called it a “Kush” – scientifically known as a Mesopotamian Kush. This Megalithic yard relates to the circumference of the Earth, the rotation and orbit of the moon and the orbit of Venus. It also relates to time measurements and to measurements of volume and weight connecting both the British system of pints and pounds to the metric system of litres and kilo-grams. The length of the megalithic yard, if used as a pendulum, also produces a musical scale that is used by the Australian Aborigine peoples in their sacred didgeridoo music that harmonises with the Earth's own frequencies.6 The only ancient measuring system that does not directly use the megalithic yard is the Minoans and even then, the Minoan system has correlations with the megalithic yard when used in multiples.
___
Even the Great Pyramid of Cheops on the Giza plateau in Egypt was built using the megalithic yard. The Great Pyramid was built so accurately that modern attempts to build even half scale replicas have failed to match it in terms of tolerances. In fact every attempt to build a replica, on whatever scale, has failed as modern technology is not capable of replicating the building techniques, and their accuracy.
___
These are just a very few examples of how discoveries made by scientists of all disciplines have been deliberately and systematically removed from our knowledge. Because the findings have not fitted in with the publicly allowed view of human history, all of these amazing findings have not seen the light of day. The scientific world has built a fantasy story of human history, how the universe works and every aspect of life within this universe to suit an agenda that is deliberately designed to hide the facts and present us with a version of reality that fits into an agenda. But whose agenda is it? – see below.
So for all of those morons who used to ask me at talks if there was any scientific “proof” of what was contained in the Akashic, the answer is this:
Firstly, if the science these morons referred to was the public face that science presents; then the answer is no.
Secondly, if you do some research and begin to scratch through the public veneer that the scientific world presents, you will find that there is overwhelming evidence that the Akashic is correct in virtually all aspects of human history.
This is what I mean by we need to alter the way in which we think. Whenever you encounter a piece of scientific “proof” ask yourself “is this true?” or is it part of the same agenda to blind us to our true history and heritage. Instead of taking scientific pronouncements at face value question them; carry out a little research of your own and you will soon find that your view of the world, and humanity‟s place within it, is so so different to what you were propagandised into believing it was.
Always ask; always question – that way you might just arrive at some kind of truth at who you really are and what your purpose on Earth is. “If you ask a question, you are an idiot for five minutes. If you do not ask a question, you are an idiot for life.”7
Who Is Behind It?
Scientific research, in all fields of science, requires money in order for the research to be carried out. This funding can be from universities as part of a teaching project; but is more usually funded from institutions, companies, governments or foundations that have a particular interest in a region of research. If governments, the funding is usually for a military project or a region of public concern or of public health. If private companies, it usually is to find the health benefits, or not, of a particular product or pharmaceutical drug. If from institutions or foundations, it is usually because that organisation has a particular interest in a region of research.
In the 1930‟s, the Rockefeller Foundation decided to use some of its vast funds to finance projects in virtually all regions of scientific research – from archaeology to psychiatry; from medicine to anthropology. The Foundation also gave a massive research grant to the Kaiser Wilhelm 3rd Clinic in Germany for Eugenics research9 whose work was continued in the Nazi concentration camps. So why did this particular Foundation make all of these funds available?
To quote one of its officials:
“...Apart from the fascination of gaining some knowledge of the nature of the mind-brain-body relationship, the practical values in such studies are potentially enormous. Only thus may we gain information about our behaviour of the sort that can lead to wise and beneficial control”.8
So knowledge of human behaviour throughout our history was to be gathered together in order to find ways of controlling the population – the beginnings of the New World Order.
Population Control
As part of the plans laid out in the Rio de Janeiro Climate Conference was the requirement that the human population be reduced to “a manageable five hundred million”. So how do you set about killing that many people?
Wars?
Since the UNCED Rio de Janeiro Conference in 1992, there have been wars in Iraq (twice), Afghanistan, Libya and several African countries have had armed conflicts, many of which have been dragging on for over twenty years. The death toll from all of these wars runs into many millions. But becoming directly caught up in these armed conflicts is not the only way of dying as the effects of some weapons continues for many, many years.
The United Nations published a study into the effects of the use of “depleted uranium” weapons, published in 2005[9], summarises as:
“There is no viable future generation in Afghanistan and that Iraq is likely to head the same way”.
We have seen, in recent news reports that it is indeed the case in Iraq as the number of birth defects has increased by several hundred percent since the war in Iraq began. Not only that, but the British Atomic Weapons Research Establishment published its own report to the British government that the dust cloud from the “shock and awe” bombing of Iraq blanketed the whole of western Europe with a dust cloud of radiation over one hundred times more deadly than the radioactive cloud produced by the Chernobyl nuclear power station accident.
Service men and women who have returned from Afghanistan and Iraq have exhibited symptoms of what has been called “Gulf War Syndrome” which was caused by the radiation from depleted uranium weapons. Where these service men and women have attempted to produce children, the number of birth defects is extremely high. The same applies across the parts of Europe that were under the radiation cloud: birth defects and massively falling birth rates have been reported in all of these affected countries. Some parts of Britain now have an infant mortality rate higher than some so-called Third World countries[10]. So the death toll of these conflicts is not limited to the battlefields. The use of “battlefield nuclear weapons” has a global impact, the extent of which is only now beginning to be seen.
To the death of many millions in the war zones, now has to be added millions more who were never caught up in the immediate area – DU weapons can only be described weapons of mass destruction on a continental scale.
Medical Treatment
Do people die of the medical treatment they receive?
According to an American Medical Association[11] (AMA) study, more people die of the medical treatment they receive than any other single cause in the western world. Take a scenario we are all familiar with: You have symptoms of ill health so you take yourself off to your doctor. The doctor prescribes you some pills. You take the prescription to your pharmacist who fills the prescription and you take the pills exactly as your doctor told you to. The doctor prescribed the pills in the correct dosage for your sex and weight in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The pharmacist filled the prescription exactly as the doctor instructed and you, being a good patient, take the pills exactly as directed by your doctor and the pharmacist.
What do you think the outcome of these actions is likely to be?
According to the AMA, every year in America one hundred and seventy six thousand people die. According to the British Medical Association (BMA), every year in Britain two hundred and fifty thousand people are hospitalised of whom ten thousand die. On a broader level, the AMA study looked at the effectiveness of all medical treatment and broke their findings down into two main categories:
1. People who consulted their medical practitioner and received treatment appropriate to their symptoms. Death resulted as a direct result of this treatment, no other factors were involved. The annual death toll in this category was seven hundred and sixty thousand.
2. You have a serious illness for which you are receiving medical treatment but the determining factor of whether you lived or died is purely the medical treatment you received.
The annual death toll in this category was two million. As far as I am aware, the BMA has not carried out a study similar to that of the AMA but it has stated that the annual British death toll under category one of the AMA study is ninety three thousand people[12].
The AMA concludes its report by commenting that they consider the figures to be “the tip of the iceberg”. Given that prescriptive drugs are marketed and prescribed world-wide and that medical treatment is virtually the same throughout western countries, it would be fair to assume that over twenty million people die every year as a direct result of the medical treatment they receive.
The problem with these kinds of reports is that they do not get reported in the media. The media, in all of its various manifestations, is controlled by five people, all of whom are Bildebergers. These five people determine what is, and what is not, published in newspapers, magazines, books, TV, radio and the internet and so much information of this nature is deliberately withheld from the public.
I must apologise here because I have misplaced my notes about this particular individual but he deserves to be mentioned for his bravery – this was the British doctor who told the truth about the MMR vaccine and autism. This particular doctor realised that many of the children he was treating had symptoms of autism and these symptoms seemed to develop shortly after the children had been vaccinated with the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. When the doctor went public with his research, he was criticised by his colleagues, sacked by the health authority he worked for and struck off the medical register.
Since the doctor's treatment, fifteen studies have been carried out into his claims and all of these studies confirm his findings: the MMR vaccine has a strong causal link with autism.
Given the case of this doctor, as well as several other scientific professionals, when he was Prime Minister, Tony Blair had all public employee contracts changed to contain a clause along the lines of:
If a government employee or an employee working for a company that handles government contracts speaks out about their work and the hazards found by that work, the employee will be sacked, possibly be criminally prosecuted and loose all pension rights for the rest of their lives. Several other governments have also added similar clauses into their employee contracts. So is it any wonder that we hear so little in the mainstream press about what is really going on in the world?
The only way of getting through this blanket censorship is to start thinking “outside of the box”.
If an announcement is made by governments or transnational companies, always ask yourself why? If an announcement is being made, it will be to cover up something or to put a spin on the situation that the government or the transnational company wants to present you with. If it is a subject that interests you, investigate it – it is always possible to obtain information from non-official sources if you are prepared to look.
This is another example of altering the way in which we think. Do not accept political or government claims at face value – they are trying to present an image not facts. More often than not, governments act on behalf of their own self interests or the interests of industrialists or transnational companies – the wants and rights of the electorate are very far down the list of government priorities.
I could go on about the medical profession - try checking out the truth about vaccines, for example - but I am sure that you can see what I mean about how easy it is to kill people by the million and hide the statistics.
___
This is what I mean by we need to raise our level of thinking. If we are to get back on track for our aim of re-integrating the whole of the soul – the higher self – back into the body, then we need to think about the world around us and, in particular, the world as presented by the New World Order.
But what is the New World Order, and all of its many tentacles, all about and who controls them? Even the Illuminati, who do control the many organisations that are all secretly working to bring about the New World Order, are themselves controlled. So who is ultimately responsible for misleading, misdirecting and misguiding us
in this way?
The Velon (To be continued)
SOURCE
(Scroll down the page & find the link to download the pdf to your computer)
The Archon-gels or the corrupt demiu...
The Archon-gels or the corrupt demiurge with George Kavassilas and Cameron Day
