Many of the alternative sites mentioned in this thread each to themselves are pretty good at telling only part of a story, they tend to focus on specific angles. This is very much like mainstream media where the fraud not only involves the type of stories they DO tell, but as well by the many other stories they do not & will not tell. Rense, Art Bell, Alex Jones, Daryl Smith and Michael Piper are examples who do provide large elements of truth in thier expose's, while each have also shown themselves to be entirely unwilling to tread on certain factual territory. For instance, as far back as the 1830s, there were well-known people, Samuel Morse (of Morse-code fame) among them who were trying to raise the alarm of the nation to the threats and plots against it's people and their very ways of constitutional law and freedom, being secretly carried out at that time, large scale, by the then various forces within the jesuit empire who, at that time, much of which was being operated out of Austria. Morse spent years living in various parts of Europe observing and noting such fomentations of European elite AKA "holy alliance" (IE> the Secret Treaty of Verona, 1822) who arranged to use "missionary work in the united States" as cover and primary means to infiltrate this nation. There was much documented but otherwise mostly untold / untaught history to this story, much of it well hidden and buried in the depths of many years gone by, that indicates the same influences were largely responsible for fomenting the civil unrest needed to ignite what became the war between the states - North versus South; it is also documented that the same foreign influences living within this land eventually succeeded in pulling off the assassination of Lincoln. Whover "dunnit" (and how, Booth was just a significant pawn being controlled by many others), there was apparently enough details visible when the smoke cleared that the then leaders of this nation formally separated all ties with jesuits and the pope. Such ties were formally re-established by Reagan in the early 1980s.

Rather than cast aspersions at each of these sites and or the people who refer them, instead I leave it to the individual and their trust in their own discernment skills to sort it out on their own. Some people may get some good benefit from otherwise bad sites, so why criticize? Like their mainstream variants, many alterna-sites typicially include some truthful details as a hook to suck people into a larger philosophy based on untruths. When it comes to electronic/broadcast media, it has some distinct advantages, mainly related to many years of scientists developing and highly refining various methods of overlaying and underlaying subliminal content as well as other types of mind-control / social engineering triggers/hooks/influence. So much so that I freely admit I do not trust my skills to detect all such corruption that comes out of the sparkle box and have for the most part given up and shunned these forms of broadcast media consumption.

To quote the old serial Hill Street Blues drama.......let's be careful out there!