This is for those who have a predisposition to bowel cancer. It can have side effects too. Not bad for birch bark.
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/10/28/aspirin-can-cut-bowel-cancer-risk-by...
Published October 28, 2011
Aspirin cuts the chances of developing bowel cancer by more than half in people with a family history of the disease, British scientists said Friday.
"We've now got the cherry on the cake -- the randomized controlled trial that sets out to try to prove that [aspirin prevents cancer] and did so," said Sir John Burn, of Newcastle University, northeastern England, who led the study.
His team looked at 861 people with Lynch syndrome, an inherited predisposition to cancer. Even though aspirin can cause internal bleeding, Burn said that the case for such people to start taking it was "overwhelmingly strong."
"If you give them all aspirin, you prevent 10,000 cancers but cause 1,000 ulcers," he said. "That's a good deal."
A large study last year concluded that a daily dose of just 75 milligrams of aspirin could cut death rates for all cancers by a third. Burn's team gave patients 600 milligrams of aspirin a day, which they believed was likely to show a bigger effect in preventing cancer. He is now starting a trial to determine the ideal daily dose.
Burns said that he was already taking aspirin, which was likely to be most effective if taken from a patient's late 40s or 50s.
"Before anyone begins to take aspirin on a regular basis they should consult their doctor as aspirin is known to bring with it a risk of stomach complaints, including ulcers," he said. "However, if there is a strong family history of cancer then people may want to weigh up the cost benefits."
Half of the 861 people in the study took two aspirins (600mg) a day, for varying lengths of time. Ten years after they began taking the pills, there had been 19 cancers among people who had taken aspirin, and 34 among those taking a placebo. Among those who took the drug for at least two years, there were 10 cancers in the aspirin group and 23 in the placebo group.
The effect began to be seen five years after they started taking aspirin and persisted well after they stopped, researchers reported in .
How exactly aspirin prevents cancer is unclear, but Burns believes that compounds found in the drug trigger genetically damaged cells to destroy themselves at a very early stage.
Nowhere in your link was there any indication that aspirin caused macular degeneration. Doctors "prescribe" it in many cases for the very reasons that your link indicates - it thins the blood. That's why they specifically tell people to take it to prevent heart attacks and strokes.
Fish oil is a blood thinner, as is garlic and many other natural remedies.
http://www.livestrong.com/article/392626-is-fish-oil-a-natural-blood-thinner/
"13,000 sudden bleeding deaths/yr and much increased chances of pancreatic cancer:"
Typical scare tactic. Not one bit of evidence at that web site to back up that spurious claim. Had there been any increase in other cancers or any other disabling side effects - it would have been noted.
Willow leaf (which is aspirin, in synthetic form) has been used in natural medicine since at least the time of Hippocrates.
Fear causes illness. Both allopathic witch doctors and alternative witch doctors use it extensively.
Not one bit of evidence to back up the claim? If you had bothered to follow the link you would have seen the study which found the referenvce to the study:
"The study of 88,000 nurses found that those who took two or more aspirins a week for 20 years or more had a 58 percent higher risk of pancreatic cancer."
I would say that beats the speculative study of 1/100th the amount of people quite handily. Likewise while you were quick to dispute aspirin causingt macular degeneration, you also chose to ignore the reference to aspirin causing cataracts:
And other studies have demonstrated a 44 percent increase in the risk of developing subcapsular cataracts in those who have used aspirin for 10 years or more. The risk is greatest for those under 65 years of age (Ophthalmology 98;105:1751-1758). You call actual facts a "typical scare tactic"? What would you call your titling your post "Apririn Cuts Bowel Cancer by 50%", when the actual study found that it might cut an inherited form of bowel cancer that is applicable to only 1 in 1000 people? I suppose it beats another maim-stream headline I saw which touted the study thusly "Aspriin Blocks Colon Cancer!" Even so, your headline qualifies as sensationalism far more than the other posts qualify as scare tactics. Have we seen you here before in another ID? Perhaps one which was chased away for all the mainstream propaganda? Just curious . . .
"Have we seen you here before in another ID? Perhaps one which was chased away for all the mainstream propaganda? Just curious . ."
I report advances in medicine that are made by whatever legitimate source I see. The study clearly stated that the 50% reduction was with those with a predisposition to it. In fact in another quote of the article I posted in response to your doubts it says a two thirds reduction.
You are quoting about cancer from an ophthalmology publication? Brilliant!
I know that taking aspirin cuts down on your business interests when people discover that aspirin is light years cheaper than the products you sell. You obviously have a personal interest.
Speaking of ID - you think you have folks on Cure Zone fooled by posting under a pseudonym pushing oleander products when you are in fact Toni - a seller of oleander products. It's like DQuixote is the FDA and Mr. Isaacs is the pharmaceutical company - the two are obviously sleeping together. Or do you deny even that?
There is not one thing on Cure Zone that prohibits the posting of beneficial medical discovery news.
If you don't like the fact that aspirin prevents cancer then don't read about it.
I thought maybe you might offer us some indication that you are not a past member back to post in support of mainstream medicine and against alternatives. I was somewhat inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt since you have at least paid lip service to recognizing the ills in mainstream medicine. Instead you merely deepen my suspicion with an attack against oleander.
Virtually no one who has been around CZ is "fooled" by my use of Dquixote1217. Dquixote1217 is my original several years old ID here and it has alway been openly known and displayed that my actual name is Tony Isaacs. Once I agreed to have my own private forum (by the WM's request and not mine, btw), I chose my real name for the private forum and kept this ID for posting outside that forum.
I don't directly sell oleander or any other supplement. All I sell is my ebooks, which you do not see me promoting in forums outside my private one. I do have affiliate arrangements with some companies and one of those, Utopia Silver, does sell an oleander extract in capsule form. However, I only get credit for affiliate sales when I provide a direct affiliate link and you don't see me doing that in forums outside my private one either.
Insofar as promoting something, I promote natural and alternative healing that I believe in - and that includes products which I have no relationship with at all. What you don't see me me promoting in this site whose stated mission is "educating instead of medicating" is mainstream medications, either prescribed or over the counter, which have side effects that include stomach ulcers, intestinal bleeding, eye damage and/or increased cancer risk. Such as aspirin.
BTW, new numbered poster - do you care to tell us what your name is? Or your past ID(s)?
"I don't directly sell oleander or any other supplement. All I sell is my ebooks, which you do not see me promoting in forums outside my private one."
You post advertisements on the main page of CZ that goes directly to one of your web pages that sells oleander extracts.
When you can't kill the message you try and kill the messenger. The Greeks did it and there are many who still try it today. I've even seen you do the same thing - when oleander passed a preliminary trial and I won't search your post for it or others but I know you linked to a main stream media publication.
What's wrong with the main stream media? A series of links that I made on one post about aspirin were to The Guardian in London - one of the most respected news sources in the world for an unbiased view of most everything - including medicine. Those who blame the main stream media, the government, or any other source for their ills are living in their own hell and they are stuck there.
Yes - I've been banned - a couple of days ago from the "Natural Healing" forum. I asked the moderator to back up his claim that comfrey tea grows cartilage in the knee as he posted that it did to someone who was dealing with bone on bone. He banned me. I'm proud of it. I don't generally go into private forums like that or yours because I believe that it's your little fiefdoms and you can do and say anything you want in there. I went into NH because a poster was asking about things that I have extensive personal experience with - castor oil and knee problems. I provided what information I had and got banned for asking for supporting evidence. I didn't know that there was a narrow minded little individual running the place. I have never been banned with any other name or number and as I said a month or so ago when I began to repost, I poke my head in once in a while because I do have experience with healing cancer, using urine therapy - which healed one cancer at least with before and after medical conformation, castor oil, and several other things. And - I'm undergoing some conditions that relate to the CZ boards
However Toni when you poke your nose into exterior forums - and you do make good contributions at time, I get to question other responses that I see as simply knee jerk boiler plate. I'm not an ass kisser either. I'm not going to pat you on the head when you make a good post and rap you when you don't, I simply want the members of the board to have more than one view when I see it as appropriate. People on CZ should be aware of ALL the research that is going on especially in relation to cancer. We all, everyone of us, are operating under free will and to deny access to media of any kind is just what despots of the past have done and are still trying to do.
Through all of this most people but not all, are neglecting the fact that we are each an eternal spirit. Everything that we are doing we are doing as a spiritual lesson (not religious) and many go through horrific agony be it in the death process, a search for a healing modularity or just some of life's difficult lessons when they don't know they have to do that. For every illness there is a spiritual problem behind it and when we know what that spiritual problem is we can heal on a physical level. Everyone can.
Everyone is a bright spark of light including you, the employees of Merck, John of God, and everyone else. Sometimes it's difficult to see it, but it's there.
Now it's back to the trick or treaters - they're the future and they are wonderful.
Does that mean that I "sell" everthing which has an ad or link posted on my website? Would the same then be true of CZ selling ever product they have an ad for?
But hey, this isn't a debate forum so let's just agree about the trick or treaters. Did they have any dogs with them?
http://www.tbyil.com/Doggy_Halloween.htm
Aspirin used in studies is often buffered. The buffering agent is magnesium. Why is that important? Because aspirin is often given credit for results that are actually due to magnesium. For example, a study last year demonstrated that increased magnesium intake could reduce colon cancer by 50 percent.
Similarly, aspirin is wrongly given credit for being able to prevent heart attacks, but when you look at the studies which appeared to show prevention you find that the aspirin was buffered with magnesium (and studies on aspirin which was not similarly buffered did not produce such results.
Magnesium has proven cancer-preventive properties the same as it has proven benefits for the heart and cardiovascular system. Likewise, deficiences in magnesium have been assoiciated with increased cancer and cardiovascular disease risks/ It is estimated that anywhere from 70% to as many as 95% of us are deficient in magnesium. I daresay that NONE of us are deficient in aspirin.
A little more detail on the aspirin/cancer study. You will note that even the 75 mg aspirin worked too. None of the 75 or other low dose aspirin that I've seen are buffered. I seriously doubt that whether or not the 300 mg variety was required to be buffered was even a consideration.
Also notice in the 2nd article that just 1/4 aspirin with milk before bedtime for people over 45 cut "mortality" by 10%.
Then in the 3rd link you will find that aspirin is a wonder drug and that it prevents several cancers.
It's too easy, too simple, and nobody's making a buck on it (like garlic) so no wonder the naysayers are coming out of the woodwork.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8853310/Aspirin-cuts-bowel-cance...
Aspirin cuts bowel cancer risk by up to two-thirds
Taking just two pills of aspirin a day can cut the risk of bowel cancer by almost two-thirds for those at the highest risk, research has found.
Thousands of lives could be saved if people with a particular hereditary condition took aspirin daily, suggests the British-led study.
Scientists have described the results, published in The Lancet, as "the icing on the cake" after more than two decades of research into aspirin's effect on cancer.
Today's study specifically looks at the preventative effect in those with a hereditary condition called Lynch Syndrome, thought to affect about 60,000 people in Britain. Despite being present in only one in 1,000 people, it is responsible for one in 30 bowel cancers.
But the researchers said the study added powerful new evidence that aspirin protected against bowel cancer in the wider population too.
Bowel cancer is the third most common cancer in Britain, with 40,000 new cases annually and over 16,000 deaths.
The study of 861 middle-aged people with Lynch Syndrome found those who took two 300mg pills daily for two years, were 63 per cent less likely to have developed bowel cancer five years later, than those given a placebo.
The results are critical for those with the syndrome because their lifetime risk of developing bowel cancer is as high as one in two.
Professor Sir John Burn from Newcastle University, who led the international project, said he and colleagues were "very pleased" with the "impressive" results.
He and Professor Tim Bishop, of Leeds University, suggested those with Lynch Syndrome should start taking aspirin from the age of 20, as they can develop cancers well before middle age.
They estimated that, excluding the young and the very old, about 30,000 of them should be taking aspirin.
Prof Burn said: "If we were to put them on aspirin now, we would stop about 10,000 cancers over 30 years."
However, only about 10 per cent of those with Lynch Syndrome know they have it.
The results follow a landmark study led by Professor Peter Rothwell of Oxford University, published a year ago.
It found people taking low dose (75mg) aspirin daily for five years were 25 per cent less likely to have developed bowel cancer after 20 years than those not taking it.
The participants had been taking the drug to prevent heart disease and stroke. They were drawn from the general population, not just those with Lynch Syndrome.
Prof Rothwell consequently suggested everybody should consider taking low dose aspirin daily from the age of 45, although he said it was a matter for individuals to decide "rather than us making definitive statements".
Professors Burn and Bishop echoed that advice. They have already advised their patients and volunteers with Lynch Syndrome to take aspirin, and said others needed to consider the "sliding scale" of aspirin's benefits and risks depending on their circumstances.
The drug is known to increase slightly the chance of stomach and intestinal ulcers, particularly in the elderly.
While Prof Rothwell's work convinced many that aspirin helped prevent cancer, because it was an observational study it could not prove cause and effect.
Today's study was different, said Prof Burn, being "the first randomised controlled trial [of aspirin] undertaken with cancer as an end point".
The group now aims to determine the best dose for those with Lynch Syndrome and wants to recruit 3,000 people around the world to do so. They will be given either 600, 300, or 75mg daily.
David Willetts, the Universities and Science Minister, welcomed the "groundbreaking study" as "an excellent achievement for the UK research base".
He said: "It has the potential to save thousands of lives worldwide and is clear evidence of the value of long-term studies showing simple steps that can be taken to improve people's lives."
*The NHS will have to deal with 45 per cent more cancer cases by 2030, a leading charity is warning.
Cancer Research UK predicts the number will climb from about 298,000 in 2007 in 432,000 in 2030, which could "overwhelm NHS resources".
The biggest reason behind the rise is the ageing population, but changing lifestyles are also a factor. Cancers of the mouth, kidney and liver are forecast to be among the biggest risers, due in part to smoking and drinking.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8184776/Aspirin-the-wonder-drug-...
Aspirin 'the wonder drug' fights off cancer as well as heart disease
Taking a quarter of an aspirin with milk just before you go to bed every night could reduce your chance of dying in middle age by a tenth, the biggest study into the drug has found.
The "exciting" evidence shows that the benefits of those aged over 45 regularly taking the cheap painkiller "drowns out" any side effects that could occur from the regular medication.
It is so compelling that the researchers are convinced it will lead to a change in public health prevention guidelines.
Doctors have known for a long time that aspirin, which thins the blood, can protect against heart disease and stroke but the latest research shows the "wonder drug" has an even stronger effect on cancer.
At the moment an increase in the risk of stomach and intestinal bleeding associated with the pill has scared many health experts off from recommending it to the healthy general public, but this new effect could tip the balance, claim the study authors.
Anyone with a family history of heart disease or cancer, would be especially helped by taking the painkiller as a preventive medicine.
A team of researchers led by Professor Peter Rothwell at Oxford University reviewed the data from eight separate trials on aspirin which together included 25,570 patients taking the drug regularly for on average four years.
They found that "all cause mortality" was reduced by 10 per cent for those taking a 75mg dose of the drug.
A normal over-the-counter pill contains 300mg.
For individual cancers the effect could be even stronger. The 20-year risk for prostate cancer was reduced by about 10 per cent, for lung cancer 30 per cent, bowel cancer 40 per cent and oesophageal or throat cancer by 60 per cent.
The study, published in the Lancet, suggests greater aspirin use could potentially save thousands of lives a year in relation to cancer alone.
Combined, all cancers claim more than 150,000 lives in Britain every year, while cardiovascular disease accounts for some 200,000 deaths.
Prof Rothwell, 46, who started taking aspirin two years ago, said it was likely to have a major impact on public health – and be even more effective than screening.
"The size of the effect of cancer is that it does more or less drown out those sort of risks," he said.
"I think it is not for me the person who has done the research to make recommendations but I suspect that the guidelines will be updated as a result of these findings.
"This is likely to be much more effective than screening.
"It looks as though as there is a pretty large benefit in terms of reducing cancer and the risks are really pretty low.
"It looks likely the longer you take aspirin, the greater the benefit."
Prof Rothwell believes that the sensible time to start taking aspirin would be in the early to mid 40s when the risk of cancers start to go up.
Prof Peter Elwood, of Cardiff University’s School of Medicine, conducted the first trial into the effect of aspirin on heart disease in the 1970s, started taking the drug about that time.
Now 80, he believes the risks are "trivial" compared with the benefits.
"It is very exciting evidence and should be investigated more fully," he said.
"It really is a remarkable drug."
It is just latest claim for aspirin which was formulated as a painkiller more than a century ago. It is now linked with helping in diseases ranging from heart disease to cancer to dementia.
Advocates believe that its active ingredient is akin to a vitamin that almost everybody should take, as our modern diet does not provide it.
It is thought that it works in cancer because it boosts the body's ability to root out, repair or kill rogue cells that can develop into cancer.
For heart disease it thins the blood and reduces the risk of clotting.
The researchers believe that the optimal time for taking the tablet would be between 45 and 75 years old – before which the risk of cancer is to low – and after which the risk of internal bleeding is too high.
If taken with milk at night it could be even more effective as calcium is thought to boost aspirin's effect and the active ingredient of the pill is more powerful during sleep.
They believe that it would be effective against breast and ovarian cancers but there were too few patients studied to get a definitive result.
"Perhaps the most important finding for the longer-term is the proof of principle that cancers can be prevented by simple compounds like aspirin and that 'chemoprevention' is therefore a realistic goal for future research with other compounds," said Prof Rothwell.
Prof Alastair Watson, Professor of Translational Medicine at the University of East Anglia, said the study was a very important development.
"It is further proof that aspirin is, by a long way, the most amazing drug in the world," he said.
Cancer Research UK described the study as "promising".
But the charity warned that patients should consult their GP before deciding to take aspirin daily because of the drug's side effects.
A spokesman for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) said it would take into account the new evidence when reviewing it guidelines.
"We do review and update all our guidance on a regular basis, and if there is new evidence that we think might change any of our existing recommendations, then we will take that into account, " he said.
A Department of Health spokesman said: "We welcome this addition to the evidence base and note that more research is required before clear conclusions can be drawn on the implications for clinical practice."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8184543/Aspirin-the-wonder-drug....
<snip>
Pregnant women with certain auto-immune conditions or high blood pressure are also prescribed low doses of aspirin to reduce the risk of miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, low birthweight and foetal death.
The latest research is now showing that aspirin can reduce the risk of several cancers including bowel, prostate, throat and lung and possibly breast and ovarian.
It is thought the way aspirin reduces the risk of some cancers is by blocking an enzyme called Cox2 which is drives some forms of cancer.
New research is emerging that aspirin may be beneficial in preventing dementia as well although it is inconclusive and more evidence is needed. This may be because of the reduction in strokes and associated damage and its anti-inflammatory effect which would protect the brain from build up of certain proteins associated with dementia.
<snip>