Should James be allowed to post thin... 
lisamarie23
13 y
2,948
//www.curezone.org/forums/am.asp?i=1870124
He is now using his own forum to launch caged attacks both the Webmaster and all the people in the last debate.
I honestly don't know the rules here on curezone and what is considered crossing the line.
If a forum owner has complete autonomy in their own forum and can make wild accusations such as blaming alternative therapies and promoters of such for the fact that the medico mafia has been trying legislate freedoms away since the early 1900's then please disregard this.
I am genuinely curious about where the line is.
- Re: #68716
13 y
2,613
Lugol’s Iodine Free S&H
J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine Solution. Restore lost reserves.
Energy Awareness Course
Use CureZone kode to get a free session!
- Re: sundragon
13 y
2,565
Lugol’s Iodine Free S&H
J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine Solution. Restore lost reserves.
Energy Awareness Course
Use CureZone kode to get a free session!
- Re: #68716
13 y
2,412
This is a reply to # 1,870,185I'm almost always good for a roll on the floor, but tend to prefer the hay.
- Re: #68716
13 y
2,412
- Re: sundragon
13 y
2,565
- I see absolutely nothing wrong with ... #121206
13 y
2,530
This is a reply to # 1,870,137seriously, I think you all need to stop obsessing about what that guy posts.
If you don't like his forum... don't read it!
Nobody's forcing you to read his posts. Stop throwing a fit every time he post something that rubs you the wrong way
if he is in a neutral forum attacking you then at least you have a point. But when he's in his own forum and you're there reading his posts and then crying about it... that's just ridiculous in my humble opinion.
it is his form. Don't like it? Don't go there.- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,692
MoreThis is a reply to # 1,870,163"if he is in a neutral forum attacking you"
I guess this is the question people want to understand. Should a forum owner ,someone endowed by the Webmaster with the special privileges of being a forum owner with expectation of acting responsible be allowed to attack others from the shelter of their own domain? Or use these privileges as a podium to attack others?- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #121206
13 y
2,499
This is a reply to # 1,870,168Yes,but complaining about posts INSIDE his own forum has nothing to do with all that you just explained
just sounds like people are stalking him and then complaining about every little thing- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,683
This is a reply to # 1,870,169I'm sure everyone has their "opinions" but I think that is why the question is being asked of the webmaster.
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,683
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... Mira528
13 y
2,703
MoreThis is a reply to # 1,870,168Newly created Username #145 ... your very first post ... interesting ...
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,634
This is a reply to # 1,870,190Yes I'm fairly new here about a month,first time posting with my number ,but I do have an interest in this debate, I have been through the mill with all the supplements,herbs,tincture's and what not and was considering doing the liver/gallbladder flush after being told that sometimes you need to clean out the old stagnating waste that accumulates in the body before any supplementation can do anything more then just add to the congestion.
The information is staggering and fearful by some. So now I am left with making my decision based on what side is the most reliable and forthright and who seems to care more about healing and helping and who seems to be it for their own self interest. This last bout of debates has helped me decide to go with the liver/gallbladder flush supporters who where willing to end this debate and big enough to apologize for any offense they may have made while the anti flush group won't let it go and continues to offend the others.That and the fact that I am sick and tired of spending money on the latest supplement/herb/enzyme/androgen/etc. with no lasting positive results.I'm also a firm believer that if you are secure in what you are doing there is no need to discredit what others are doing,accentuate the positive not the negative.
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,634
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #121206
13 y
2,499
- Re: I see absolutely nothing wrong w... #145783
13 y
2,692
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #116107
13 y
2,815
This is a reply to # 1,870,137I see nowhere in James' post anything directed at the recent debates. What I read is a general opinion of frustration concerning the claims made by those not having proper scientific documentation as proof of effective and safe treatment for whatever protocol they are promoting. Across the board, this is leading to the government requiring proof through scientific studies first, before anything can be allowed to be marketed, or a claim of healing made. This takes a lot of financial backing, and many small companies will not be able to finance the studies, making these products unavailable to those who would choose to use them. It will be illegal to sell them. This includes herbal remedies of all types, protocols, you name it. I do not believe James' intention in this post was to be antagonistic to the recent debate, but to let people know that there is an agenda to limit our health freedoms, and to let all know that without valid Science of proof of effectiveness and safety, the government tends to make all illegal until proven safe and effective.
- very well said n/m #121206
13 y
2,516
- Re: very well said n/m mo123
13 y
2,493
This is a reply to # 1,870,170I see nothing wrong with the post, what I do see is people looking for anything to attack. If you don't like James then don't read his posts. He does not mention names or anything. It is his forum and he can agree or not agree. I think it is time everyone look for calm at curezone and get back to happiness.
Sara- Re: very well said n/m Mira528
13 y
2,616
This is a reply to # 1,870,181"I think it is time everyone look for calm at curezone and get back to happiness."
Well said. I agree with this statement 100%.
Let's look for ways to help each other and accept that people have different beliefs that will never be changed by arguing.
Mira528
- Re: very well said n/m Mira528
13 y
2,616
- Re: very well said n/m mo123
13 y
2,493
- these points are all moot trapper/kcmo
13 y
2,438
This is a reply to # 1,870,167this is a free speech zone and has disclaimers out the hoo-hoo to prove it. anyone can say anything here, and they do from what i have read. everyone here knows what the government thinks. people come here to escape the approved, not to find it. that is curezone, where people are free to come and go if they dont like it.
- very well said n/m #121206
13 y
2,516
-
Re: Should James be allowed to post ... uchihaMadara
13 y
2,746
This is a reply to # 1,870,137We can't have double standards. Much like you're allowed to post virtually anything, others that disagree with you must have that same unabridged freedom.
Almost all research contains Conflict of Interest (COI). Most of it confuses researchers and they must decipher the truth. Research can be written with bias for or against a subject, but it is often disguised using language to confuse average readers - like politics. Most NEED a class or some education to decipher research properly and throw away the garbage. Is there a place that does just that online!? We can't depend on authorities to manage themselves, that's a COI of it's own.
http://scienceprogress.org/2009/07/financial-conflicts-of-interest-101/
We can't simply depend on luck or testimonials are human beings, we need to KNOW answers - but not when financial interests skew results. That's why we have forums, especially to debate findings.
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #145783
13 y
2,633
This is a reply to # 1,870,341You're right of course, freedom of speech and all that. Maybe it should be chalked up as just a poor choice of words,after all bad taste is not a crime.
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... uchihaMadara
13 y
2,398
This is a reply to # 1,870,354Personally, I don't agree on how the whole thing became so heated, especially with constant and consistent personal attacks. Both sides committed many acts of logical fallacies.
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #145783
13 y
2,508
This is a reply to # 1,870,362I don't think there is anything logical about it really. Do your own thing and let others be is logical. But in the end some chose to take the high road ,some chose the low road and continue doing so, that's illogical.
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #145783
13 y
2,508
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... uchihaMadara
13 y
2,398
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #68716
13 y
2,379
This is a reply to # 1,870,341"freedom of speech ???
Perhaps you really mean, freedom for any paltroon of whatever ilk to blab incessantly blithering nonsense which only they themselves and perhaps two or three others of their feather in the world having nothing better to do than henpeck keystrokes seemingly give a hamsters hiney about.
Give a weapon to a fool, an you end up with an armed fool. Fortunately, with "free speech", most folks who exercise that one have little between their ears, hence they're effectively un-armed.
Expand 15 messages, 21 to 35 of 35 cora
13 y
2,833
R
- Re: Should James be allowed to post ... #145783
13 y
2,633
- Re: #68716
13 y
2,613
Share:
Translate This Page: