But he is part of the NWO trying to keep us down.
Oh, of that I have absolutely no doubt. Gates, who has unscrupulously beaten down and gobbled up his competition on the way up, is one of the wealthiest NWO elite, a Bilderberger/CFR favorite and is heavily associated with the Rockefeller eugenics movement - though they couch it in more paletteable terms these days.
Google "Bill Gates eugenics" and see what comes up.
Insofar as Gates helping kids - I wonder if that is not akin to trying to buy a stairway to Heaven? The mafiosos have also been great contributors to churches and charities, but that has not washed the blood or stench of their crimes off their hands.
Having said that, it would be great to see money which goes to poor developing nations spent on better nutrition, clean potable water and better overall sanitation to prevent the spread of disease. Much better than just jabbing poor undernourished children and peoples with vaccines which contain carcinogens, mutagens, spermicides and more.
For the same cost as a single vaccine, one of the water filtration units pioneered by Potters for Peace could be made which would enable an entire family to have safe drinking water. We see the same kind of false justification for vaccines here, despite vastly superior sanitation and drinking water: just jab a concoction of unnatural chemicals instead of concentrate on proper diet and lifestyle and building a strong natural immune system that is our natural first line of defense against disease and illness.
Actually, people who have healthy immune systems are not equally susceptible to disease. While they may still come down with diseases, they do so far less often than those who have weak immune systems. The reason is that in many instances a strong natural immune system prevents a disease from ever acquiring a foothold. As the late great scientists Antoine Bechamp observed, disease is caused by a combination of undernourished cells and toxins which create an unhealthy environment (unhealthy cellular terrain) which is favorable for disease to proliferate.
Barring an immune disorder, it is very rare to find instances of a strong immune system to be detrimental. Even when there someone does have an immune disorder, natural immune modulators can often enable them to have a strong immune system while controlling the immune disorder.
The Spanish Flu was a very rare exception when it comes to the normal benefits of having a strong immune system. In the instance of the Spanish Flu, people were exposed to a new virus which they had no natural antibodies for. If such ever happens again, it is still a good idea to have as strong an immune system as possible while taking plenty of natural antivirals and pathogen killers.
Perhaps I should clarify:
First of all, it should be universally recognized that having a strong immune system is much preferred to having a weak one. Sure, people with strong immune systems do get sick, just not generally as often or as bad. In other words, on average people with strong immune systems usually come down with far less illness and are better able to fight illness off when they do have it.
When I said the Spanish Flu was a rare exception, I was referriing to it being a rare exception when a disease outbreak adversely affected more people with strong immune systems than those with weak ones. As I indicated earlier, even in the event of a new pathogen which we did not have natural immunity to I would still opt for a strong immune system and take extra measures such as anti-virals and pathogen destroyers. I should also have mentioned natural immune modulators. Personally I would not choose to take a hit or miss vaccine (as is often the cases when it comes to influenza) which also introduced items such as mercury and other neurotoxins, carcinogens, mutagens, etc.
Good points we agree on when it comes to helping people have clean water, better sanitation and better nutrition. And I also agree with the multinational greed and villany that has victimized the developing countries.
As for the part about the numbered poster or any linkage of posts, I have no idea what you are talking about.
For the most part we appear to agree.
If the choice came down to vaccinating a person who was condemned to poor sanitation, unclean water and lack of nutrition or not I will concede that is some instances a vaccination might be better than doing nothing at all - I would just prefer to see the emphasis on helping the poor have better nutrition, clean water and better sanitation instead of a vaccination first (and often only) approach.
If I don't need to understand what you are talking about in regards to a numbered posters messages, then why did you choose to include it in your reply to me? At any rate, let me know what you find out. Privately if you prefer.
When you finish your investigation, perhaps you could take on something that is puzzling to me: namely, why the pattern of a certain group of people coming along and responding to my posts with innuendo and/or personal attacks and/or attempts to renew old grudges. As best I can tell, such posts and posters are attempting to make ME the issue instead of what the thread started out about.
The way I see it, healing, helping and trying to "educate instead of medicate" is what this website is supposed to be about. Cheap shots, personal enmity, holding on and/or attempting to resurrect old grudges, behind the scenes skullduggery and such are not in keeping with those ideals and, imo, the members of this site would be best served by putting such issues and actions in the past and moving on.