What I would like to know is why Ryan is still even allowed on CZ. I never see him contribute anything positive and he is always bashing people, whether it be me or some other poster. And it is clear that he does not care about facts or safety since he seems to only want posts he approves of to be posted despite evidence presented contrary to his beliefs.
Since Ryan keeps bringing up trolls maybe he should look up the definition then take a long hard look at his own actions.
I stopped posting in the Support Forums soon after you arrived HV. I got sick and tired of being attacked by you every time I did and nothing being done about it!
ROTFLMAO!!! Look who is talking. All you do is attack people. In fact I encourage people to take a look at your posting history to see how many of your posts have nothing to do with support but are rather all about your troll activities.
Every single time someone wanted advice on pH balancing or info on certain minerals you jumped in like a troll confusing those seeking help and scaring them away!
People are not being scared away, they are asking questions. If you actually took the time to read the thread before attacking you would have seen that the post originated over facts I had already posted previously.
I am sorry it violates your twisted view of reality, but I am here to help people, which involves posting known facts and clearing up misconceptions. If you don't want to get upset over your bogus belief system being violated then don't read my posts. SIMPLE!!!
You have vowed to discredit this protocol just like any establishment med troll would do.
Another troll lie. I never vowed to do any such thing. And as I pointed out the other day you keep referring to me as a med troll even though I have been working in alternative medicine for decades. And since you pointed out that I sell things, which are herbal formulas, you are aware that I am not in to mainstream medicine. So you just exposed your lying nature AGAIN!!!
You really do not belong on any alternative health sites because there is no alternatives with you ,only your way and nothing else like a pig at slop trough you want it all for yourself and screw everyone else!
See my last comment. Again you just got caught in another lie. Maybe I should work on an herbal formula for your habitual lying. But I doubt if you would take it since you seem to enjoy being a lying, deceiving troll.
Well the first thing I would do would be to ban you from that forum. You don't believe in the principles????
So why are you there?????
As I posted earlier the whole thing was about something I posted earlier, and secondly it was cross posted to other forums. I do not visit that forum because of its cult-like atmosphere. Many of the people there do not have any interest in the truth.
As for your claim that I do not believe in the principles this is a good example of what I have been saying. I am well aware of how the body balances its pH. So there is the principle, allowing it to do its job as it is designed to and not forcing the body in to an unnatural pH, such as alkalosis, just so the body has to stress as it tries to readjust its pH.
So are you really saying that the only people that should be allowed to post there are people who ONLY agree with certain, specific practices that can harm the body? And anyone who tries to expose the dangers should not be allowed to post warnings? This is a perfect example of one of the biggest problems with CZ. It is not about healing, it is about the politics.
The one thing that Ryan actually has gotten correct is that the people there are adults and should be allowed to choose for themselves. In order to choose though people should be presented with multiple views so they can verify the facts if they choose. What you are proposing is nothing short of censorship simply because YOU do not agree with what is being said. If you don't agree then don't read my posts. You, nor Ryan speak for everyone. There are plenty of people who are interested in other views so they can make rational, informed choices. For example, early on when I came to CZ someone was advocating oleander soup for cancer with no warnings about it has to be prepared to render it safe for consumption. So what if I had not spoke up? How many people could have read that and thought they could go grab a bunch of oleander leaves and boil them in to a soup for ingestion? How many people could have died because they were not presented with all the facts? There are dangers with taking certain alkalinizers as well. So you advocate people risking getting sick or injured over being completely informed so they can make an informed choices? It is sounding that way to me!!!
Anyone can look at your posting history and in the Debate Forums and see you simply disagree with everything including simple things like brix readings with the refractometer!
ROTFLMAO!!!! Do you even know what brix is?!!!!! It is a measurement of SUGAR CONTENT!!!! Coca Cola has a higher brix content that an organic carrot, this DOES NOT make it healthier!!!
Except the moderator who is obviously completely in the dark or just plain biased and the Webmaster who don't seem to give a damn!
Which is why you are still allowed to post attacks such as the one you just posted on the Cancer Debate forum. This is clear evidence that the moderators and Webmaster don't give a damn about clear TOS violations since all you do is attack others and you have not been banned yet.
As far as this subject goes everything you say is a lie!
Again, proof of my last statement!!!
Funny HV you have no problem banning anyone who disagrees with you in a flash in your forum, one or two posts and their gone,yet you whine and cry and stomp your feet like a two year when you're not allowed to bring your belligerent attitude to other Support Forums !
Again, you distort the truth. I have only banned a few people from my forum and that was because they were acting like obnoxious jerks. I do not ban people simply because we disagree. If you read though my site you will see plenty of disagreements between myself and people that have not been banned from my forum because they were disagreeing without attacking and otherwise being obnoxious. So stop lying about the issue!!!
lol!See what I mean? Your inability to learn to understand such a simple concept is astounding, and people tell me you are intelligent, Lol! One time in your life you heard that the refractometer was used to measure sugar and thats as far as you researched it!
Refractometers are used to measure a variety of things depending on what type of refractometer is being used. They can even be used to identify gemstones. But YOU said for brix. And what is brix? Sugar content in the solution. And as I had to point out to you higher sugar content does not mean healthier!!!
If you were not so busy looking for some way to attack me AGAIN then maybe you would have realized what you wrote in the first place!!!
Oh you are hilarious! Brix was the name of the scientist who invented the refractometer to measure the density of plant juices! A Brix reading is the measurement of totally dissolves substances (TDS) not sugar !
Of course one has to be familiar with the material being measured, but common sense pretty much dictates what to expect! Yes an idiot could not use a refractometer,you have proven that! lol!
ROTFLMAO!!!! Can't you get ANYTHING right?!!!!! Brix IS NOT a measurement of TDS, it is a measurement of the amount of sugar dissolved in solution as I pointed out. Here, let me help you out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brix
"Degrees Brix (symbol °Bx) is a unit representative of the sugar content of an aqueous solution. One degree Brix corresponds to 1 gram ofsucrose in 100 grams of solution and thus represents the strength of the solution as a percentage by weight (% w/w) (strictly speaking, by mass). If the solution contains dissolved solids other than pure sucrose, such as other sugars, minerals etc., then the °Bx only approximate the dissolved solid content. The °Bx has traditionally been used in the wine, sugar, fruit juice, honey and other industries."
http://www.documentation.emersonprocess.com/groups/public_public_mmisami/docu...
"What is °Brix?
°Brix is a measurement of sugar solution concentration and is required in many food processes including sugar production,
fruit juice processing, soft drink production and many other food processing areas where sweeteners are involved.
°Brix is defined as the percentage of sucrose by weight in a solution."
http://www.answers.com/topic/brix
"[BRIHKS] Named for A. F. W. Brix, a nineteenth-century German inventor, the Brix scale is a system used in the United States to measure the sugar content of grapes and wine. The Brix (sugar content) is determined by a hydrometer which indicates a liquid's specific gravity (the density of a liquid in relation to that of pure water). Each degree Brix is equivalent to 1 gram of sugar per 100 grams of grape juice. "
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/Brix-bx.html
Relative density scale used in sugar and winemakingindustry, it indicates the percent of cane sugar (sucrose) byweight (grams per 100 milliliter of water) in a solution or juice of unfermented grapes in degrees Brix (°Bx). The most commonly used refractrometer scale for measuring solids dissolved in water, it corresponds directly to therefractive index scale. " http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Brix+scale "Brix scale [brɪks]
Really HV how come so many refractometers are sold to those who measure salt content in water
Which IS NOT a brix measurement. That is a measurement of dissolved solids. And you state others are ignorant of science?!!!
and a multitude of sciences anbd industry!??? Yes a refractometer can read sugar content but it is just simply one use!
Wikipedia lol! No wonder you are so completely ignorant of this science!
LOL!!! That's it, twist things now since you were PROVEN WRONG AGAIN!!!!! Note I was the one that pointed out to you that there are different refractometers for measuring different things.
But your claim was that brix was a measurement of TDS, not sugar dissolved in solution, which I proved you were wrong as usual. So now you are trying to tap dance around the fact that you were proven wrong AGAIN!!!
lol! They even sell a brix refractometer to measure coffee !
ROTFLMAO!!! From your own link:
"So it is technically possible to use refractometers that read out in Brix (or any other scale) for coffee given that you have a refractometer with enough precision and accuracy (yes they are different!) and some basic mathematics skills. What you need to do is solve an equation relating Brix % to nD at a known temperature. Once you have nD you may then proceed to correlate that value to a TDS value using a relationship at that reference temperature. In summary: you cannot directly convert Brix to TDS. You need to convert Brix to nD, then correlate nD to TDS using ExtractMoJo or the much cheaper MoJoToGo on iPhone."
So your link not only proves that brix is not the same as TDS as you earlier claimed. So you just provided the evidence that you were wrong earlier on that claim.
And if you understood what the link was saying then you would have known that they are using a brix refractometer to first measure the natural sugars in the coffee solution (brix) so they can determine the TDS as the quote above states!!! So you just provided the proof once again that you were wrong, ROTFLMAO!!!
You really should learn something about science before posting. It would make you look at least somewhat intelligent if you did this!!!