Do you need someone to "tell" you to be yourself?? If you are following another, the path is not your own.
Seems you must be living in a bubble, or something, not to have noticed, but this is what 99.9% of hypnotized humanity is doing and has been doing for at least a couple thousand years now. It is ever on-going cyclic process. Those individuals of which Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity had arisen from, they were also living in an era in which the masses were bogged down in tradition and share belief systems, conditioned to live like their parents, and their parent's parents... conditioned to be slaves to vested interests. Its an old game. And humanity continues to get ensnared by it over and over and over again. Language changes over time. For example, what Buddha had spoken in Pali, the translaters have shredded into bits and pieces over time. The message that Jesus delivered has been warped into something quite different in meaning. Not only that, but humanity itself is quite different from the humanity that had existed thousands of years ago. The methods to wake up that were used by yoga and tantra don't work with the humanity of today. That's why you have had a tough time with meditation yourself when you tried it. You, yourself, had a misuderstanding between the differences between concentration and meditation (as I recall in a previous post you had written). That's why you "believe" that it is not for you. It is easy to see and criticize the beliefs, the filters, of others. It is more difficult to see the beliefs, the filters, that one has adopted to live by for themselves. Closing doors is also a form of filtering, belief. There is always another layer of oneself to uncover, so it seems.
Btw, there is no 'following'. Being oneself does not have anything to do with following another. This is also another of your interpretations concluded through the filters you live by. Seems you and your partner (butthead) are continually layering your own interpretations on a number of different subjects and topics. You both have a habit of "believing" what is written by others (mostly gossip between each other) as you are far removed from having from any actual experience on many of these matters you are critiquing. Examination of oneself takes some guts to see the hypocrite that lingers within. This is also part of remaining asleep and unconscious.
As for humanity being different from what it was thousands of years ago, or even ten years ago, this I do disagree with. Human beings remain the same, just the level of technology changes, our environment changes, but on a spiritual level humans do not change.
I would argue that the level of technology certainly does have an impact on the degree of mental activity that the average member of today's humanity is engaged in. This together with the fact that a large percentage of the populations, especially the developed countries, do less manual labor which most assuredly has a relation to those individuals that are members of the higher tech societies. Being that mindbody is one mechanism (not two), stress levels accumulate with in that mechanism. And physical labor is a way for it to be dissipated/released. Without this release, mental and physcial diseases would have a tendency to be ever on the increase. This results in, or at least contributes to, a higher degree of neurological dis-eases/disorders to occur, such as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADHD), the inability to remain focused on a specific topic over time. It would be also relative to a hodge-podge of other mental disorders - depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, dimentia and alzheimer's, etc... just to mention a few. Hence, meditation in the past was more easily achieved, as the demand place on the human psyche to process ever increasing amounts of information has never been at such a level as it is today... another ten years, ha! - suicide per capita will be off the chart.
This is why I say the traditional methods alone are not enough to break the mold of the obsessive compulsive habitualized behavior that have been acquired through social conditioning/education. The degree at which humanity today is experiencing such levels of mental illness is unprecented. This has a direct correlation to increased pace of living due to the level of increased technology.
This is why the spiritual Master, Osho, stands apart from the rest herd of so-called traditional type gurus. His methods have made extensive use of various psycho-therapies that have been used in conjunction with traditional methods of meditation. This would be difficult for most to comprehend and fully grasp, as most are not capable of looking outside their box. That is why the controversy over this guy. It rattles the cages of most peoples' comfort zones. Without becoming an active participant in such a Mystery School, one only is left to 'believe' that which they are comfortable with. If it is something alien relative to their own narrow view of what meditation is "supposed" to be about, then it will be complained about, it will be laughed about - just so those that critique it can go back to their cages and feel good about themselves, now that the threat to their own dysfunctional life styles has been discredited.
As for the endearing "butthead" comment, it was merely an anology used to compare your commaderie with duos of the past. For instance, people like "Laurel & Hardy", "Mutt & Jeff", "Amos & Andy", "Tom & Jerry", Mickey Mouse & Donald Duc, Rocky and Bullwinkle... and, in this case, it recollection of the famous "Beavis and Butthead" duo. I know you would probably prefer something more flattering. But, I would hardly call it name-calling.
Regards
I see that you turiya, seem to have bought into this line of thinking, but you seem to believe that your guru is going to save you, and the rest of human kind, instead of the drugs.
Nobody needs saving... but for you to say so simply makes you believe that you stand above the rest.
So, Beavis, you can 'believe' what you want... And what to say about your 'Butthead' guru? This guy is playing on you (and others) like a gameboard. Perhaps someone should spell it out for you.
Doven = Lucid Cre8tor = IC = Creotology...
First, an apology for calling you something other than your username.
Secondly, I would remind you that it was my post that kicked off this thread. Everyone here in the VibeNhance forum is allowed their space. If you don't agree with something that is said, then you may consider just to "move along" and refrain from making a derrogatory comment about the subject matter yourself. Let it go and Simply Move-On. After all this is not a debate forum. So, the way I see it, you and IC have both come here looking for a conflict on this subject matter.
Thirdly. Moving in the dimension of the spiritual is an unknown. If one already knew about it, there would be not need to venture into it. The difficulty for everyone that does this investigatory work with themselves is treading in a dimension that is not very unclear. If one does not understand the power and nature of desires, then they are capable of causing many more problems for themselves... unexpected and complicated problems.
Certainly there are pitfalls that one will come across while they undergo experimeting with their own inner psychological world. With spiritual growth through meditation, someone who is experienced with these pitfalls that can be encountered along the way can be very helpful. One can save a lot of time and energy spent on finding one's way through this labyrinth by connecting with someone who has an authentic genuine experience with such matters. Something as simplistic as understanding the difference between concentration and meditation can be quite valuable. This alone will save a lot of hardship. Understanding the difference between muttering a mantra and sitting in silence can be quite helpful. Otherwise one may continue moving in like a blindman in darkness indefintely.
Perhaps you have heard of something called the "kundalini crisis". This is an example of one of the pitfalls that one can fall into when moving on their own in the dimensions of the spiritual, experimenting with dreams, imagination and meditation. You can examine a posted message in the schizophrenia forum to read about what has happened to an individual that encountered such a situation. http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1032985
One is dealing with that which is unknown to them. One can read many books on different areas of interest and never be certain whether the author really knows what he is talking about. It is easy for someone to have a book published on a subject that they have no real experience with. The impetus is the usual - making money, acquiring power over others. There are many many pretenders that claim to be an authority, when in fact they are not. Pretenders, charletons, fake guru types that exploit others are many.
When I began investigating the subject of meditation, I recall that I read a number of books in which I felt the authors really did not really know what they was talking about. It deals with the subjective. It is a topic that can be taught by someone that needs no certification requirement. There isn't any university that offers degrees on such things. If there is, then it is BS. So it became immediately clear to me that the big question is: who can be trusted? Is the information reliable? Where can one go to find authentic information on the subject? Because in this realm, if one steps in the wrong direction, then all the following steps will lead you further away. Many can spend most of their lives believing in something that will not help them in their growth in consciousness. One can spend much time in believing nonsense. So this is the biggest thing for many, who can be trusted?
For me, there never was a desire or a need to find a spritual Master. It was purely incidental that I came across this man called Osho. I came across one of his books purely by accident. At the time I was looking for a book to read to take my mind off a troubled relationship. I found a book called the Book of Secrets. Attracted to the title, I opened it in the middle and read a paragraph. A paragraph was enough to want to read more. After buying it, I took it home and read the introduction. It turned out to be a book on 112 methods of meditation. As I read it the more and more I felt that this guy was not just talking about meditation. It was coming out of his actual experience with it. As I kept reading through the different methods that were discussed, I would try these as I went. Two weeks later I fell into the gap between words.
So, to me, this man was authentic, and not operating under a pretense. The information that is contained in his books is a rarity. It is quite valuable for those that are genuinely in search to sort things out. There was never a "need" for a guru. His books can be of great help to those that have an open mind. And, NOT intended for those that are closed, who have never looked at his books, who have never seen this man in the flesh, who like to pre-judge others and have already pre-concluded from reading what other books, articles and blogs say about the man. Don't worry because your comfort zone will alway be protected by keeping doors closed. And that is what a belief system does - it keeps doors closed.
I am posting on this guy because I see it as very valuable information. It is suggested reading. If you don't agree, then just ignore it and move on. Is that so hard to do? Apparently it must be.
Regards