Thank You again Hv in advance.
So, when we're over 50 we need to take chromium suppiliments, or are there herbs that can stimulate our bodies into producing more? And what part of our bodies produces chromium?
Thank You again;-)
Chromium is a mineral derived from food. Since it can be used up when we eat a lot of simple carbohydrates, this is the link between high sugar consumption and type 2 diabetes. As chromium levels fall the insulin receptors close off and the insulin becomes unable to carry the glucose out of the blood.
Because we tend to eat a lot of simple carbohydrates, and chromium is found in trace amounts in most foods it is a good idea to supplement. The average healthy person I recommend 200mcg daily. Type 2 diabetics I recommend 200mcg 3 to 4 times daily.
Duh. Chromium is a trace mineral. I'm tired.
So, kids especially need chromium supplimented because most kids don't eat very well, right?
How many pills (all suppliments total) should we be taking a day, and is this forever, or do we take breaks?
Thanks Hv.
What projects are we keeping you from? I'm sure glad you're here. Maybe something wonderful will happen and you'll be able to do it all, or have your projects done for you;-)
I wish you much success.
Duh. Chromium is a trace mineral. I'm tired.
So, kids especially need chromium supplimented because most kids don't eat very well, right?
Definitely won't hurt. For kids though, unless they are diabetic I recommend 200mcg once daily. Chromium rich foods also a good idea if you can get them to eat them. Sources include nutritional yeast, onions, whole wheat, oysters, peas, and green stevia.
How many pills (all suppliments total) should we be taking a day, and is this forever, or do we take breaks?
You don't have to take breaks. But unless you are diabetic, prediabetic, or have reactive hypoglycemia daily supplementation is not as important since you are likely getting enough chromium in your diet.
Thanks Hv.
What projects are we keeping you from? I'm sure glad you're here. Maybe something wonderful will happen and you'll be able to do it all, or have your projects done for you;-)
Mostly writing my book. I think I have typed more here in the last few weeks than I have typed for my whole book so far. My other project I have already completed my part and it is in someone else's hands right now. Tonight I just took a group down to Chinatown to the herb shop. That was fun.
I wish you much success.
It will be much easier holding a book and looking up stuff rather than going through so many posts, but it is very nice having you here to talk to!
I had no idea LV had a Chinatown, or people like you. I need to get out more;-)
Thank You!
I will.
Yes, our China Town has actually grown quite a bit over the last decade. It used to be just one little mall area with a supermarket. Now it could be its own township.
I'm aware of all the information regarding chromium and a reduction of glucose levels. Used it faithfully for several months (I'm Type II) and it never worked for me, and it didn't work for any of the other three Type II family members either. Reducing carbohydrates to fewer than Atkins, has. I control my Type II with diet alone.
With Type II, there is rarely any one factor - except, carbohydrates cause a host of difficulties for Type II and reducing them can help control blood sugars considerably.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/01/03/carbohydrates-a...
Carbohydrates cause nearly all age-related diseases. Age-related diseases are thought of as unavoidable. Many people consider it normal to get one or more of these diseases as they age. They rationalize that they are simply unlucky or that others have "better genes," neither of which is true. Their health problems are most likely caused by their belief in the many popular myths and distortions about nutrition. Most likely they got hooked by the low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet craze and are now suffering as a result.
The most common excuse used instead of identifying the real culprit, carbohydrates, is heredity. People flippantly say, "It runs in my family," or "My mother also had diabetes," or "My father also had high blood pressure and heart disease." Age-related diseases could best be described as "Excessive Carbohydrate Consumption Syndrome."
The scientific evidence is clear. Carbohydrates are a sinister, sly food category that has been getting away with murder. Carbohydrates have powerful allies. They grow, manufacture and market thousands of different carbohydrate products made from fruit, grains and starchy-vegetables. The supermarket floor space allotted to these manufactured carbohydrate foods is about 80 percent of the store, and yet the scientific minimum requirement for carbohydrates in the diet is ZERO.
Carbohydrates are not an essential element for health. In fact, optimal health lies in keeping the amount of carbohydrates in the diet to a minimum. The supermarket departments that contain the healthy essential proteins and essential fats are the fresh meats, fresh fish and seafood, dairy and non-starchy vegetables. Everything else in the store is very high in carbohydrates, which turn to glucose, hype the metabolism and trigger the release of disease-causing hormones like insulin, cortisol and adrenaline.
A low metabolism is ideal for long life and good health. A high metabolism excites hormones in the body that eventually cause age-related diseases. A low metabolism is analogous to diesel engines that are known for longevity and high mileage without a breakdown. Diesel fuel is an oil that the engine uses for energy similar to fats in the diet. A high metabolism is analogous to a nitro-methane drag racer that gives a tremendous burst of energy but explodes after a few races. The nitro-methane fuel is fast burning similarly to sugar in the diet.
The pathogenic effects of carbohydrates are slow but sure. The "20-year rule" was coined to describe the length of time between the start of the high-carbohydrate diet and the onset of disease. The number of diseases, severity and time to develop are directly related to the percentage of carbohydrates in the diet. In the advanced stage many diseases are prevalent in the sufferer before death occurs.
Carbohydrates displace essential protein and essential fats in the diet to cause a double health reversal. The carbohydrates themselves cause disease, and the deficiency of protein and fats contribute or cause other diseases.
The consumption of carbohydrates generally begins showing the disease effects in either one of two directions.
The primary high-carbohydrate foods to avoid are sugars, honey, flour, grains, legumes, fruit, milk and starchy-vegetables.
Whole grains cause disease in both humans and animals. Whole grain breads and bagels are not the healthy food as people are lead to believe. All grains have a very high level of omega-6 fatty acids, which are pro-inflammatory. Grains are a poor source of protein. Grains are the most allergenic of all foods. Multiple sclerosis, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis are rare in populations where no grain products are consumed such as the Paleolithic (hunter-gatherer) diet.
The Awful Truth About Eating Grains
Grain fed to feedlot steers makes them fat and causes intestinal diseases. The feedlot diet given to steers is almost identical to the USDA Food Guide Pyramid. Both diets are very high in grains. The feedlot operator is deliberately making the steers fat. Fatty beef is given higher grading, receives the best price and has the best flavor. The time in the feedlot is short and the steer is sent to slaughter prior to developing any serious health problem. People get fat and develop disease for the very same reasons. Grains are worse for humans because we are omnivores. Steers are herbivores, but the grains still make them fat and give them diseases.
Primitive cultures that primarily ate meat from the hunt lived in relative good health. Those people who switched to a grain-based diet obtained from the cultivation of grains suffered poor health, diseases and a smaller stature.
Fruit is Not as Healthy as Many Claim
Fruit is not the healthy food many claim. Fruit is mostly fructose sugar with some vitamins, minerals and other nutrients. Those vitamins and nutrients are easily obtained from meat and non-starchy vegetables without the fructose. The body processes fructose from fruit in the same way as it processes fructose from soft drinks. There is no difference. Fructose is fructose no matter what the source. Fructose causes insulin resistance as proven in scientific tests. Fructose is highly addictive and most people simply refuse to give up fruit no matter how sick they become. This is identical to lung cancer patients who continue to smoke cigarettes. See links below for more information:
Carbohydrates Trigger Disease-Causing Hormones
The hormones involved in the carbohydrate disease loop are not the sex hormones but rather metabolism hormones. The process starts when carbohydrates are eaten in the form of sugars such as sucrose, fructose, lactose and others. Simple carbohydrates are molecules made by chains of glucose that are short. Longer glucose chains form carbohydrates that are classified as complex. The body breaks the chains apart until individual molecules of glucose are released into the blood stream. Then the problems start. The body is very sensitive to the amount of glucose in the blood, commonly called blood sugar. A small part of the brain called the midbrain that is about 1 inch (25 mm) long and red blood cells require glucose as they lack mitochondria (powerhouse of the cell) and cannot use fatty acids for fuel.
The lack of glucose (hypoglycemia) as energy for the brain can cause symptoms ranging from headache, mild confusion and abnormal behavior, to loss of consciousness, seizure, coma and death. The body can maintain an ideal level of glucose by creating it in the liver from amino acids derived from protein and/or from triglyceride fatty acids in a process called gluconeogenesis. The low-carbohydrate diet results in a perfectly controlled and stable blood glucose level in this way. On the other hand, the high-carbohydrate diet results in the body's constant attempt to prevent blood glucose swings both to the low-side (hypoglycemia) or the high-side (hyperglycemia). This control is regulated by the hormone insulin to reduce the glucose level and the hormone adrenaline to act as an emergency method of raising the glucose level.
Hypoglycemia is the train whistle signaling the diabetes train is coming down the track. The diabetes engine is powered by carbohydrates and gaining speed. Nibbling complex carbohydrates throughout the day to control the blood sugar swings will do nothing more than slow the train a year or two. The diabetes train can be stopped dead on the tracks only by avoiding all carbohydrates. The condition of uncontrolled blood sugar swings is called diabetes mellitus, or type 2 diabetes, and has become epidemic in all English-speaking countries. It will soon become a catastrophe.
Younger people appear to handle carbohydrates without a problem because the cells of the younger body readily accept the glucose with a small insulin response and turn the glucose into energy. However, the cells get resistant to this constant bombardment of glucose, and increasing levels of insulin are necessary to maintain a normal blood glucose level. As the cells become resistant, the insulin assists in the conversion of the extra glucose into triglycerides, which raise the triglyceride level in the blood and are deposited as body fat. Carbohydrates cause obesity, not fat. The high carbohydrate diet is a natural killer for many reasons.
Insulin is a Disease-Causing Hormone
Insulin is a hormone made by the beta cells in the islets of langerhans in the pancreas. Body cells require insulin in order to use blood glucose.
A high level of blood insulin causes many unhealthy body reactions, which eventually lead to diseases of all types. Glucose from the excessive consumption of carbohydrates is turned to body fat by the high insulin level and is also deposited in the arteries and organs causing arterial diseases, heart disease, strokes, blood clots and other diseases. High blood glucose signals increasing insulin production until the pancreas becomes fatigued after many years, making the disease seem age-related. Glucose rises uncontrollably when insulin production drops. The result causes diseases of the eyes, kidneys, blood vessels and nerves.
Carbohydrates drive insulin production that causes cardiovascular heart disease (CHD). Many heart attack patients first learn they are diabetic in the hospital emergency room, but they may not be told about the close relationship between their two conditions. Blood insulin reaches high levels and remains high as one progresses from hypoglycemia to Type II diabetes where insulin production collapses. Insulin is a very strong anabolic hormone. It pushes blood glucose into cells. It turns blood glucose into triglycerides and stores them as body fat. This sudden appearance of heart disease has been described by the author as the "Instant Atherosclerosis Cycle" (IAC).
Insulin also pushes small dense LDL molecules into the artery wall to start the atherosclerosis process. Animal research with insulin has proven many years ago that the artery will plug with atherosclerosis just downstream from the point of injection.
Carbohydrates cause the LDL molecules to be the unhealthy small, dense variety. The high-fat, low-carbohydrates diet causes the LDL molecules to the safe large fluffy light density variety. Higher LDL blood levels on the low-carbohydrate diet do not present the same CHD risk as do LDL levels on the USDA Food Guide Pyramid diet of 60 percent carbohydrates.
High-Insulin (Hyperinsulinemia) Increases Cancer Risks
Carbohydrates drive blood insulin production that causes cancer. There are strong associations between a high-carbohydrate diet and many diseases that present a secondary cancer risk. Cancer risks are greatly increased with diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease and many other unhealthy conditions caused by the high-blood glucose and high-blood insulin levels.
High-Insulin (Hyperinsulinemia) Increases Cardiovascular Disease Risks
The only way to prevent diseases caused by insulin spikes and plunges is to eat a low-carbohydrate diet. Many primitive societies have lived with very few carbohydrates in the diet and have proven diabetes and all the diseases of consequence do not exist. A great example is the Eskimos of the far north prior to the introduction of white-man food.
The bad effects of insulin do not end here. High insulin spikes signal the body to release cortisol and adrenaline hormones, which also contribute to disease.
Cortisol is a Disease-Causing Hormone
Cortisol is the major stress hormone of the natural glucocorticoid family, which regulates metabolism and provides resistance to stress. Glucocorticoids are made in the outside portion (the cortex) of the adrenal gland and are chemically classified as steroids. Glucocorticoids increase the rate at which proteins are catabolized (broken down) and amino acids are removed from cells, primarily muscle fiber, and transported to the liver.
Glucocorticoids cause amino acids to be synthesized into new proteins, such as enzymes. They also raise blood pressure by constricting vessels, which is a benefit in case of injury. They are also anti-inflammatory. All of this is well and good in a healthy individual with normal glucose and insulin levels. Unfortunately, high cortisol levels cause many unhealthy reactions.
Understanding Adrenal Function
"An excessive ratio of carbohydrates to protein results in excess secretion of insulin, which often leads to intervals of hypoglycemia. The body, in an attempt to normalize blood sugar, initiates a counter-regulatory process during which the adrenals are stimulated to secrete increased levels of cortisol and adrenalin. It follows that an excessive intake of carbohydrates often leads to excessive secretion of cortisol."
Excess cortisol:
High-cortisol levels caused by excessive carbohydrate consumption and high-insulin levels cause the body to extract high-tensile strength collagen protein fibers from bones, remove the mineral matrix by demineralization and weaken connective tissue at the joints. The protein loss is accelerated by a low-protein diet, and the bone minerals are lost in the urine. One is literally peeing his/her bones away. The result is a rapid and shocking diagnosis of osteoporosis and degenerative disk disease where the spine can lose as much as one inch (25 mm) in height in as little as one year. Bones fracture more easily, and the dreaded hip fracture is much more likely to occur.
Women are told to drink lots of milk and eat plenty of yogurt to get additional calcium with the promise it will prevent bone loss, but the advice is based on faulty logic. The additional lactose in the milk and yogurt plus the additional sugar and fruit added to yogurt only serve to increase the dietary carbohydrate load. The net result is harmful to the bones as many are discovering.
All of this can be prevented by eating a high-protein, high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet.
Adrenaline is a Disease-Causing Hormone
Adrenaline (epinephrine) is the "fight-or-flight" stress hormone. Epinephrine is a neurotransmitter secreted by the adrenal gland that is associated with sympathetic nervous system activity. It prolongs and intensifies the following effects of the sympathetic nervous system.
All of these effects are great if one is being chased by a lion or attacked by an intruder into the home. However, these effects are unhealthy to a person sitting in an office, watching a football game or simply going about his everyday life.
The last item on the above list is very disruptive to the intestinal tract and leads to intestinal diseases. People are advised to eat more high-fiber whole grains and high-fiber fruit to overcome the constipation resulting from this slow down of the intestinal system, but this advice is backward. These are very high-carbohydrate foods, which cause a surge in insulin and adrenaline that shut down the digestive processes. (Bowel Diseases and Candida--News You Can Use.)
High-insulin and hypoglycemia (low-blood sugar) cause adrenaline to increase when no fight-or-flight stress situation exists and thereby causes unhealthy body changes. The helpful body responses to adrenaline become a health hazard when adrenaline is elevated over a period of time. The long-term elevation of adrenaline is very unhealthy and leads to many diseases.
These changes include effects to the cardiovascular system that increase the risk of coronary heart disease. The low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet as recommended by the USDA Food Guide Pyramid is disease causing because it promotes hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperadrenalemia. Prolonged elevated adrenaline has the following effects on the cardiovascular system:
Adrenaline addiction is very common. Type-A personalities become addicted to their excessive activity by the stimulation and arousal of adrenaline. People who are constantly angry, fearful, guilty, or worrisome arouse their adrenaline hormone even though they may sit around doing nothing else. People who are excessive in their participation in jogging, exercise, bodybuilding, aerobics, sports, skiing, mountain climbing, car racing or flying aerobic airplanes become addicted because of the adrenaline rush from their activity. They describe the "rush" they get from their activity and feel depressed when they can't participate for some unexpected reason.
James F. Fixx was addicted to running and wrote the famous jogger's book, The Complete Book of Running. He was a marathon runner and vegetarian on a diet of high-carbohydrates and low-protein. These were a perfect setup to arouse and maintain a high level of adrenaline. He died on his daily run of a massive heart attack proving to the world that exercise does NOT prevent coronary heart disease. Fixx admitted in his book that his own research showed the athletes from his university alumni had a shorter life span than the "couch potato" students. This difference may have been caused by the difference in adrenaline between the two groups. Hypoglycemia and stress are a deadly combination.
Chromium has different forms, some being more effective than others. Dosing is also important to have an effect.
Although you are right that there are other factors such as vanadium levels, activity, amount of body fat, muscle mass, etc. Vanadium helps to reduce blood sugar even if insulin receptors are closed, and it helps to open insulin receptors in the process. Increased body fat can increase insulin resistance, while muscle burns glucose even in a resting state. Increased activity though burns more glucose. This is why I like to see diabetes addressed from different angles including sugar blocking, carbohydrate blocking, natural insulin-like compounds, magnesium for insulin production and preventing insulin damage, silica to prevent insulin damage, etc. The file I posted was part of an old posting on other boards which I wrote because I had mentioned chromium and insulin receptors on the board and there were several naysayers that did not believe me. So I figured I would modify the post a little and post it here because it is something that is beneficial to diabetics, pre-diabetics, and those with reactive (not chronic)hypoglycemia. It is cheap, and will not cause any harm at the recommended doses.
As for the article you posted, I agree with the majority of it. There are a few things though that I strongly disagree with.
First, their claim that there is no difference between the fructose in fruit and the fructose in soda, which is actually a fructose/glucose mix (high fructose corn syrup). This claim is very misleading for a simple fact. Fruits also contain fibers and fats that slow down the absorption of sugar. So there is less of a sudden spike when ingesting sugars from fruits as opposed to a soda. This is why higher fiber diets are recommended to diabetics.
By the same token they claim that high fiber means high carbohydrate, and thus causes insulin spikes. Again this is misleading. Yes, fibers are carbohydrates, but they are not digested by the body. You could grind up a two by four and eat the sawdust, and it is going to have little if any effect on blood sugar. In order to be absorbed the long chain sugar units of the fiber would have to be broken down in to smaller glucose units for absorption. This would require that our bodies produce the enzyme cellulase, which we don't.
The second thing I disagree with is their claim of how insulin causes heart disease. It does not deposit fat in to the arterial walls. In fact, in order to do this it would have to have fat receptors, which I have never heard of with insulin. Insulin is capable of transporting glucose and vitamin C, but I have never seen any evidence that it transports fat. Insulin moves most of the glucose to the liver for storage as glycogen. Once the liver has its glycogen store the excess glucose is converted in to lipoproteins that are released in the blood where they can be converted to fatty acids.
Anyway, back to the point. Insulin is responsible for many of the adverse effects of diabetes. Diabetic retinopathy, kidney damage, gangrene, and much of the heart disease are all caused from insulin damage, not the elevated glucose. The damage comes from the powerful vasoconstrictive effects of high insulin. This leads to rupturing of the micro blood vessels. In the eyes you have diabetic retinopathy. In the kidneys you have kidney damage. In the extremities they can develop gangrene. And the constrictive effects of larger arteries leads to damage of the lining from both the strong constriction, and the higher blood pressure on the arterial walls. In response to the inflammation from the damage, cholesterol deposits on the injured area in an attempt to heal the injury.
Runners suffer the same problem. It is not the high carbohydrate diet that leads to heart disease, but rather the increased pressure on the arterial walls that lead to arterial damage, and thus cholesterol deposition. In fact, the reason runners get the slow pulse, low blood pressure, and low body temperature is the heavy exercise load causes the thyroid to start shutting down (exercise induced hypothyroidism) to compensate for the heavier load on the vascular system and body temperature. In other words it is the body's protective mechanism. But it can only go so far to protect the body. Hypothyroidism can also increase inflammatory homocysteine levels, which can further increase the risk of heart disease.
As a final comment I really disagree with any strict diet, which includes low carb, high protein. Especially in diabetics. Diabetics are already at high risk for kidney damage from insulin. High protein diets put more load on the kidneys and increase the risk of kidney damage due to uric acid crystals that can shred the kidneys if not completely hydrolyzed. In addition, foods such as green leafy vegetables are good source of magnesium, which helps to prevent insulin damage.
"As a final comment I really disagree with any strict diet, which includes low carb, high protein. Especially in diabetics. Diabetics are already at high risk for kidney damage from insulin. High protein diets put more load on the kidneys and increase the risk of kidney damage due to uric acid crystals that can shred the kidneys if not completely hydrolyzed. In addition, foods such as green leafy vegetables are good source of magnesium, which helps to prevent insulin damage."
You're going to have a very difficult time selling that to my diabetes clinic - Virginia Mason, Seattle. Their diabetes research arm has been researching this disease since 1923 and they put all of their Type II patients on a restricted carbohydrate diet allowing only 15 per meal for a total of 45 per day. That's fewer than the Atkins induction diet which allows 50 per day total. I've personally seen the positive results in myself and several other of their patients as we met over time. Humans were not designed for refined carbohydrates - let alone grains. Even many of the "vegetables" that we eat were not available to the early hunter gatherers from squash, potatoes and other night shades, to loads of hybridized non-processed food. The Inuit of Greenland ate a lot of fat and few carbohydrates and had no history of heart disease or stroke - until they began eating sugar and other Western foods in the past 40 or so years.
Dr. Bernstein, a Type I diabetic has a very interesting background that required he become an MD at age 45 to have his program accepted by the medical community, many of who still don't accept it. He is the originator of home blood sugar testing and closely followed his blood sugar swings from what he ate. In his book "Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: The Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars" he advocates only 4 carbohydrates per meal - less than VM, with no restrictions on fat. Very few people can follow his program but those who do control their diabetes much better than any other method. There is nothing wrong with fats and oils, it is when you combine them with carbohydrates that you get into a heap of trouble.
Dr. Mercola's site is where I found that good article on carbohydrates. Mercola has also written the book "The No Grain Diet" which advocates eliminating all grains from our diet. I have a good friend who is a jogger and not overweight. She followed Mercola's diet plan and lost 10 pounds in a week, all around her middle.
You can talk of hormones all you wish, but the biggest block to our health is our mouth which can be controlled by the owner's brain. Carbohydrates kill - and that article, and my clinic, Dr. Bernstein, and Dr. Mercola are all in agreement on that point.
As a final comment I really disagree with any strict diet, which includes low carb, high protein. Especially in diabetics. Diabetics are already at high risk for kidney damage from insulin. High protein diets put more load on the kidneys and increase the risk of kidney damage due to uric acid crystals that can shred the kidneys if not completely hydrolyzed. In addition, foods such as green leafy vegetables are good source of magnesium, which helps to prevent insulin damage."
You're going to have a very difficult time selling that to my diabetes clinic - Virginia Mason, Seattle.
I don't care to "sell" it to them. I present known facts. Whether or not someone chooses to accept that information or investigate it is up to them.
Their diabetes research arm has been researching this disease since 1923
That does not impress me one bit. The medical establishment has been researching cancer longer than that and they have not made any real progress either. The fact is that I have seen a number of people get off their diabetes medications with herbs alone. So it find it even more interesting that in all that time they still don't have a cure on the market. I guess they are not trying too hard. Actually it reminds me a lot of all the non-profit groups out there supposedly looking for a cure, always getting close, and never getting there. Look at the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA). Rife was curing MD back in the 1940s, so why are they still raising millions a year to supposedly find a cure. And what about all the proven cancer cures out there? Yet groups like the ACS make sure they stay off the market. Then there all the AIDS agencies out there trying to raise money for AIDS research. What is really funny about this is these same groups and their researchers keep referring to AIDS as a disease. It is not a disease, it is a syndrome. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Syndromes are not diseases. And they are never going to learn the answer of how to deal with AIDS themselves until they learn the difference. So I have no faith in these research groups. If a cure were to be found they would lose their donations and research grants. No group like this is going to bite off the hand that feeds them. By the way, is this the same group that was falsely claiming that insulin transported fats in to the arterial walls causing heart disease? and they put all of their Type II patients on a restricted carbohydrate diet allowing only 15 per meal for a total of 45 per day. That's fewer than the Atkins induction diet which allows 50 per day total. I've personally seen the positive results in myself and several other of their patients as we met over time. Humans were not designed for refined carbohydrates - let alone grains. Why is it you have groups out there claiming we were never designed to eat grains? And others out there claim that we were never designed to eat meat? And yet both groups never provide to any of their claims. Actually the fact is that we are designed to eat both. The evidence is in our teeth. All animals with teeth have teeth designed to handle the food they are intended to eat. Meat eaters tend to have canines to grab a hold of meat and thinner sharper teeth for cutting through the flesh. Animals designed to eat grains and roots have flatter, thicker teeth designed for crushing. So which do humans have? Oh, that's right, we have both!!! And if we look at our closest genetic relative, the chimpanzee what do they eat? Well they have the same type of teeth we do and they are omnivores. So they feed on meats, fruits, roots, seeds........ Even many of the "vegetables" that we eat were not available to the early hunter gatherers from squash, So you think squash is modern "invention"? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/843578/posts "Piperno and Stothert compared phytoliths from squash fruits they found in sites on the Santa Elena peninsula in Ecuador to others in a huge reference collection, including wild and cultivated squash species collected throughout the Americas. Larger phytoliths like those found in domesticated varieties of Cucurbita ecuadorensis, the only cucurbit squash native to Ecuador, were clearly evident in undisturbed strata dated to 10,130 to 9320 carbon-14 years (roughly 12,000 to 10,000 calendar years ago). The carbon remaining from plant cells that survives inside phytoliths was dated using new methods developed by the authors in collaboration with a radiocarbon laboratory. Hunter gatherers in coastal Ecuador probably took advantage of resources from marine, mangrove and forest ecosystems, and began to domesticate wild squash varieties as they formed fairly stable settlements at the end of the Pleistocene, a plausible scenario for one of the most important economic and social passages of prehistory." potatoes Again, not a modern invention. http://darwinstable.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/did-hunter-gatherers-eat-starchy... " He recently weighed in on a contentious issue that developed eight years ago when isotopic evidence gathered from fossilized hominin teeth suggested that our early ancestors subsisted on a diet primarily of grasses and sedges. This was in contrast to the morphological work on dentition which suggested that our early ancestors flat teeth appear better adapted for chewing on anything but tough grass. Dr Nathanial Dominy further investigated this dilemma using stable isotope analysis, which tests the chemical signature on tooth enamel and is able to inform the researcher what type of food that chemical originally came from. He tested the tooth enamel of early hominins, todays mole rats which feed exclusively on bulbs and tubers (underground storage organs such as onions and potatoes) and fossils of mole rats, which were taken from sites where hominins were also discovered. The enamel of both rat samples matched that of the human sample providing strong evidence that early humans consumed tubers and bulbs. His research published in Nature further tested this hypothesis using molecular genetics. In this research they focused on the gene for salivary amylase, an enzyme in saliva that digests starch. Plants use starch to protect their fuel stores making them difficult to digest. He found through his research that chimpanzees, which subside mainly on fruit, had only two copies of this gene whereas humans have several copies of this gene. Having several copies allows more salivary amylaze to be made thus more easily breaking down starches. Thus, at some stage between the evolution of humans and chimpanzees, the duplication of these genes occurred, allowing humans to more easily subsist on tubers." and other night shades, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080628065632.htm "In general, domesticated food plants have larger fruits, heads of grain, tubers, etc, because this is one of the characteristics that early hunter-gatherers chose when foraging for food." to loads of hybridized non-processed food. Of course they did not process their foods. Fire was not widely available and food factories did not exist. As far as hybridized though, you are wrong here as well. All plants have hybridized pretty much since there existence. This is why we have so many species of the same plants. Take for example corn, which is actually a grass. Wind pollinates corn. So it readily cross pollinates with other types of corn in the same vicinity. This is an example of natural hybridization. And speaking of corn, again the original corn were small grass seeds collected and eaten by the earliest hunter gatherers. Luckily they had some flat thick grinding teeth for that kind of diet. These grass sees have since been further hybridized by wind pollination and man in to what we now known today as corn. The Inuit of Greenland ate a lot of fat and few carbohydrates http://darwinstable.wordpress.com/tag/hunter-gatherer/ "It has often been assumed by past researchers that plants were the dominant component of the diets of hunter gatherers, and therefore our paleolithic ancestors, and this reasoning was formed on the basis that plants were more readily available. This is especially true for those tribes found at lower latitudes or nearer the equator. Tribes like the Inuit were considered to largely eat meat because plant resources were simply unavailable to them." and had no history of heart disease or stroke Not true. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18774134?ordinalpos=4&itool=EntrezSyst... Low occurrence hardly means absence of. So you are embellishing your claim. Then there is this study, which found a higher incidence of heart disease is the less Westernized areas of Greenland: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17306273?ordinalpos=15&itool=EntrezSys... "The overall prevalence of CHD (AP+self-reported MI+ECG defined MI) was 10.8% in men and 10.2% in women. The highest prevalence was observed in the least westernized areas in Greenland. Physical inactivity, low education, dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes were associated with CHD." And apparently diet is not the only factor: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18324567?ordinalpos=8&itool=EntrezSyst... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7669126?ordinalpos=68&itool=EntrezSyst... "The majority of both Inuit and nGanasan are current smokers and many fail to meet minimal standards of aerobic performance. Plasma cholesterol levels are still not very high, but a substantial proportion of the nGanasan are affected by hypertension; their source of animal protein is reindeer meat rather than the marine mammals eaten in Igloolik. Alcohol consumption is also higher in Volochanka than in Igloolik. Action is needed to control smoking, reduce body fat content and increase physical activity if circumpolar populations are not to experience an epidemic of cardiovascular disease." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15736670?ordinalpos=27&itool=EntrezSys... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12535749?ordinalpos=35&itool=EntrezSys... "The evidence for a low mortality from IHD among the Inuit is fragile and rests on unreliable mortality statistics. Mortality from stroke, however, is higher among the Inuit than among other western populations. " - until they began eating sugar and other Western foods in the past 40 or so years. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9447397?ordinalpos=55&itool=EntrezSyst... "In spite of an increased westernization of the Greenlanders' lifestyle and a high prevalence of several cardiovascular risk factors, mortality from IHD is still low. " This can be explained by these studies: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9187021?ordinalpos=58&itool=EntrezSyst... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10416047?ordinalpos=47&itool=EntrezSys... There are about 5 more pages of studies I have not gone through yet. But I think I have made my point. First of all heart disease has always existed in the Inuit contrary to what you claimed. And there are various factors, other than sugar intake, that influence both the low rate of heart disease, and the supposed climb in heart disease rates in the last 4 years. As we have seen evidence is weak for this last claim. I am surprised that you and all these researchers you cite missed all these studies. They were not hard to find at all.
Low occurrence of ischemic heart disease among Inuit around 1963 suggested from ECG among 1851 East Greenland Inuit.
High prevalence of markers of coronary heart disease among Greenland Inuit.
Prevalence of smoking and its relationship with carotid atherosclerosis in Alaskan Eskimos of the Norton Sound region: the GOCADAN study.
Body fat distribution and other cardiac risk factors among circumpolar Inuit and nGanasan.
Incidence of myocardial and cerebral infarction in Nuuk, Greenland.
Low incidence of cardiovascular disease among the Inuit--what is the evidence?
Cardiovascular risk factors in Inuit of Greenland.
Homocysteine in Greenland Inuits.
High serum coenzyme Q10, positively correlated with age, selenium and cholesterol, in Inuit of Greenland. A pilot study.
Unfortunately there is no easy answer for that. What one person can tolerate another cannot. For example I use to race triathlons and do cross country bicycling. And I had a really intensive training schedule. I was consuming roughly 10,000 calories a day of carbohydrates. Mainly pasta, rice and potatoes. I still only weighed 150 pounds. And I had all the energy in the world as long as I stayed away from meats, which really killed me. As an example my longest day bicycle touring was 200 miles in 24 hours, then the other 100 miles to my destination the next day. And this was with a touring load, I did not have support following me. After a few days of eating meat I would be lucky if I could do 50 miles. Now, I eat whatever, including meats, and my weight is at 190 pounds, which for my height, 6' 2" is not that overweight. So the healthiest time in my life is when I was eating high carbs, but balancing it with a heavy exercise schedule. But I have not raced or did cross country for a while, so if I tried that now I would be in serious trouble!
And a diabetic would not be able to handle even a fraction of what I used to eat. So there are too many variables to say exactly what is the perfect diet. This is the same reason I am against the Eat for Blood Type Diet. They fail to take in to account metabolic differences. Let's say that we have three people with type A blood. And theoretically they say that chocolate is good for type A blood. But one person is perfectly healthy, one is a diabetic, and one has chronic Candida. So the chocolate would be bad for two of the three people despite the claim that chocolate is good for their blood type.
Main thing to keep in mind is that NO strict diet is healthy. This includes high carb, high protein, high fat, restriction diets, all vegetarian or raw food, all fruit, etc. Diets need to be balanced. Again the structure of our teeth indicate that our diets are designed for a variety of food from meats, to fruits and seeds.
Also keep in mind that grains contain phytates that help bind and pull heavy metals and excess iron from the body. Fruits and vegetables contain pectins that also bind and remove heavy metals from the body. Many plants we eat are good sources of phytoestrogens that help protect us from cancer and hormone imbalances. Eating a diet high in meat though can contribute to estrogen load since many animals are given estrogen to fatten them up and to increase milk production. And again, phytoestrogens can help block these dangerous estrogens. So as we balance our diet we can block adverse effects from eating large amounts of any one food.
Bottom line is that you need to find what works best for you within this balanced diet. If you are prone to hypoglycemia or diabetes you may do better with a little more protein and high chromium and fiber foods. If you have weak adrenals, higher vitamin C foods will do better for you. If you are having menopause issues then bitter foods and high phytoestrogen foods may be a better choice. If you have a lot of inflammation then foods higher in omega 3 fatty acids can help by reducing inflammatory prostaglandins. If you have thyroid issues then seaweeds, watercress, bitter foods and phytoestrogen rich foods can help. If you are suffering from osteoporosis then a diet with more silica and vitamin D can help............
If your digestion is not working properly, especially from a lack of stomach acid meat will be a problem for you. Sufficient stomach acid is required for the protein digestive enzyme pepsin to work.