Definitely. The "cancer" is more of a symptom of an underlying condition. Unfortunately, modern "medicine" considers it to be THE disease and seeks to eradicate tumors as being a cause. Roy Rife gave us a periodic table of pathogens, just like the periodic table of elements. What's astonishing with him is not his cures, but rather the means by which he was able to rapidly culture cancer, particularly the medium and source, later confirmed in a different way by Naessens. I'd look at the work of Livingston-Wheeler, Enderlein, Bechamp, then Beard, Kelley, Caisse, Hoxsey, Gerson. We have the ability for the first time to put all this work in front of us and examine it, instead of having to order articles from a library and wait 3 weeks to receive them, as predecessors had to. In the case of Gerson, even his failures are good data points once you see the connection between all these, as they confirm the validity of the true premise. Unless one has a 100% method at their hands, then uderstanding why particular events failed is more important then why things work. People are their own worst enemies, they don't take time to read until a crisis is at hand, plus loved ones rarely if ever listen to their relatives who read something on the internet or whatever. I have no doubts about the efficacy of oleander; Dr. Ozel did some fine work; one caveat being that it will eventually come back unless the person takes steps to undo the root cause of the underlying cause and makes changes in habit. Naessens' 714x works much in the same way but is injected directly into the lymph, another technique he pioneered. The best work never makes the media papers - it gets no attention. The only ones that do, are
pure allopathy which treats the tumor as the enemy, when in fact the enemy is the system which won't permit doctors to learn that the tumor is not the cause and practice their craft accordingly. That's a constraints of the system, and may not necessarily be a bad thing. Then there's the cognitive dissonance factor whereby a person who has invested substantial time and money in the belief they are learning state-of-the art knowledge, has resistance to believing that cures for something could exist in the first place, for if they did, they'd certainly be known. That's another constraint. No need to burn time on convincing those types of anything, they're already as smart as they'll ever get.