Savagegrace
I cringe when someone says they have a genetic defect or weakness.
I've seen people "get by" and "put up" with ill health, as the problem is "in the genes" and we "all" know you can't do something about that.
For the most part.....Rubbish.
A new study a few months back showed a gene having a B vitamin expression.
If the test subject got a mere 100 micrograms above what the other test subjects received of (I believe it was folic acid, B9)in their diet, this "genetic defect" wasn't expressed.
So how many people may have certain "weak" genes but not know it because they are on a "good" diet.
Whereas being on a "poor" diet will express the gene.
So it's possible that if you were checked for the GS gene when born and given lecithin at an early age and then on going.
All the "other" health issues caused by a marginally functioning liver might never occur. (Assumes lecithin does whats needed)
The delayed onset is a no brainer.
A young growing body can compensate very effectively.
The sudden onset at around 20 would seem to coincide with perhaps....beer drinking and such?
So when we think of genetic defects, is it really something that can't be compensated for?
Savagegrace