>>>>>I think someone with a long-standing disease that is neuromuscular in nature is a poor subject for an attempt to showcase the merits of the Cutler protocol. I think the possibility of reversing decades long neurological damage is next to zero.

>>>I disagree! I know mainstream medicine claims that neurone damage can't be fixed but that's actually not true. Doctors just don't know how to reverse it and therefor say it's permanent. Well, from their perspective that's actually true.

My reservations aren't based on mainstream medicine claims, but on conversations with my acupuncturist. He says that in his native China, he and others have been able to reverse spinal cord injuries and ALS with acupuncture, but only when the injury or disease was recent. After that window of opportunity has passed, the damage is considered irreversible. (Admittedly, the presence or absence of Amalgam was never factored in.) So I will agree that neurone damage can be fixed, but I think the period of damage is a factor. The people with ALS that have recovered after Amalgam removal-how long had they had ALS symptoms before Amalgam removal and recovery?

Has anyone contacted Mr. Hawking yet to see if he has any interest in the project? Do we know if he has Amalgams or other dental restoration? There is a tendency for people helping the disabled to come up with treatment schemes without consulting them, and the disabled then feel like objects being maneuvered rather than people with their own thoughts and feelings. I think he like most people would buy into a plan more readily if he was involved in the planning process. He has such a brilliant mind, surely he's capable of weighing the literature and making the decision of whether the project has merits for him or not, even at this early stage of planning.