Prison Planet.com | June 7 2006

The Toronto Star postulates that the 17
alleged terrorists accused of plotting to bomb city landmarks may not be
terrorists at all.

In an op-ed,
Thomas Walkom chronicles the history of Canadian terror arrests and how
in every case the supposed evidence against the accused has always evaporated.

The piece also highlights the alarming
absence of bullet proof evidence to suggest the Toronto suspects were plotting
anything at all.

"If the alleged conspirators knew
they were under surveillance, it seems odd that they continued along merrily
with plans to make explosives. But perhaps they are not bright terrorists.
Or perhaps they are not terrorists at all," writes Walkom.

Walkom also cites the 2004 paintball trial
for a reminder of how scant the evidence is these cases usually is.

"In that controversial case (even
the presiding judge complained the outcome was unfair), nine Muslim men
were convicted of participating in terrorist training — the main evidence
being that they had played paintball in the woods outside Washington."

Developments today have centered around
the bizarre assertion that the 17 suspects, 5 of whom are teenagers, planned
to storm
the Canadian parliament and behead Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
accusations labelled as absurd by defence lawyers.

One of the lawyers is quoted as saying,"whether
you're in Ottawa or Toronto or Crawford, Texas, or Washington, D.C., what
is wanting to be instilled in the public is fear".

Another commented that there was, "little
evidence after two years of investigation," against the suspects.

As Kurt
Nimmo discusses, the government has already changed their story
as the fraudulent nature of the whole charade is exposed.

“The Official Story is now the heroic
one that the RCMP intercepted the shipment and replaced the dangerous fertilizer
with an non-dangerous substance,” writes the blogger
Xymphora. “Obviously, some bigwig at the RCMP
realized that the sting story would be used by lawyers for the defendants,
and ordered that a safer story be spread. Rapid changes in the Official
Story is a sure sign of official shenanigans,” as such changes severely
weakened both the official nine eleven and London bombing stories, not that
the corporate media bothered to point this out, so eager were they to stumble
over each other in an effort to suck up government propaganda."

Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites!