|
The age of the earth is much younger than many people think
Atoms have consciousness
Date: 5/3/2015 7:57:31 PM ( 9 y ) ... viewed 202 times
The age of the earth is much younger than many people think
-------------------------------------------------
The more they post the worse it gets. Not sure I can put my finger on it but it appears there is an attempt to explain or understand geographic phenomenon in a short term real time scenario. Lacking an understanding of the physical forces in play over probably hundred of thousands if not millions years I guess you'd have little other choice to think or believe they were created in the same way a potter or painter would create a work of art.
---------------------------------------------------
We humans are repeatedly input the age of the earth is 4.6 billion years old.
If the age of the earth had as long as 4.6 billion years, we may well think so when we are explained mysterious rocks and Horseshoe Bend were made naturally.
In addition we may think it is a plausible story when we are given the explanation of the theory of evolution, even if we may see on parade series of mysterious rocks and building which are seen in all over the world.
http://slicer93.mbsrv.net/5-605.html
However if the age of the earth is from 20 thousand years to 50 thousand years, don't we come to doubt the theory of evolution?
Besides if we see mysterious shaped rocks, we may be urged to say "Just a moment! Why did they become such strange shapes in a short time?"
However if we were told the theory which tells the age of the earth is 4.6 billion years old was insisted by Carl Edward Sagan and he was forced to say it by the Ruler's Stars, what would you think?
You may be surprised to see the following information which tells it was Carl Edward Sagan that insisted the age of the earth is 4.6 billion years old for the first time because he was threatened by being told that he would be fallen into the hell by the Ruler's Stars if he didn't say a lie to people.
The following is from the book titled "The age of humans and the earth. It is much younger than we think!"
There was a big bang 15 billion years ago and the universe has begun.
(Written by Carl Edward Sagan -COSMOS--P 40.)
The earth was born 4.6 billion years ago.(COSMOS- P 70 of the same book.)
The ancestors of our humans were born at last before two million and hundreds of thousands of years ago.(P 94 of the same book)
However how much are these vast amount of numbers of age authentic?
This book will consider the age of the earth first and the age of the universe second.
There is a method of measurement called carbon-14 dating which is often used today.
This is the method devised by Wallet Review and he was awarded a Nobel prize for the discovery of this method in 1960.
Creationists also have a high opinion of this method and the reliability of this method has been confirmed by the things until 4000 years ago whose age can be known by means of the comparison with the Archaeological documents and materials.
Review told the age of two sets of material which is measured by the carbon-14 dating and the date which can be known by the archaeological material correspond to each other.
"The theory of creationism or the theory of evolution" (Written by Tomas F Hainz P62)
When we go back more, we can't confirm the reliability of it because there are almost no authentic Archaeological material.
However the reliability of carbon-14 dating is commonly thought to be the pretty authentic dating methods.
He checked human fossils and estimated the human age.
How was the result of his check?
Was the numbers, "millions of years" calculated as the human age?
No !
Never such vast amount of numbers came out of the check.
According to the thesis which was introduced in "American Journal Physics", he claimed the age which can be known by the human body is from 20 thousand years to 40 thousand years even if they might pick up the longest period. ("Mahaim" No9, P4)
Phd E Haronkwist tells as follows about the variety of specimen which were examined by carbon-14 dating.
"The skull which is regarded one of the oldest fossil of Homo sapiens showed only 8500 years according to carbon-14 dating, though evolutionists teaches us it is the skull of 200000--- 300000 years old.
Australopithecus is regarded from one million to two million years ago by evolutionists but the animal bones found near Omo River in Ethiopia which lies in the same place where Australopithecus was found, showed only 15500 years by means of carbon-14 dating. ("Mahanaim" No 9, P3)
He also tells as follows.
Anyone can know the result of the dating methods of carbon-14 dating, if he goes to the university library and read the Radiocarbon magazine.
He can examine with his own power, and can back up the above matters.
You will be surprised to see the survey result when you compare them with the age which are written on this magazine.
The carbon-14 dating was done by hundreds of scientists about so-called prehistoric fossils.
Among them there were Neanderthal man, Cro-Magnon, Broken Hill man, Mammoth, Mastodon, the tiger whose canine developed like saber, the wood fossil, forest fossil, coal, oil, liquefied natural gas and other extinct animals, which they found only thousands of years old.
What on earth happened on these things?
The fossils to which evolutionists gave incredibly long age are all within 20000 years when checked by carbon-14 dating.
They didn't mistake the number digit place.
According to carbon-14 dating, the human age is about 20000 years at the longest.
If so where did evolutionists bring the number of millions of years?
Evolutionists found the result of carbon-14 dating doesn't correspond with their theory of evolution.
Consequently they brought the result of the potassium-argon dating and employed it.
However they adopted potassium-argon dating as it corresponds with their hope which needed the long period in order to explain the theory of evolution even though they know potassium-argon dating is unreliable.
The evolutionists are apt to adopt the method which shows the long period.
Because they cling to the idea that humans needed a long period for the evolution until now.
As Phd Henry M Moris tells, the ground of the theory of evolution only postulates the very evolution.
The ground of the theory of evolution retroact to the faith which tells evolution must be the fact.
However there are lots of evidences which show they go against the theory of evolution.
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
