|
Stupid Dietary Laws
"Time to Repeal a Stupid Dietary Law"
Date: 6/7/2014 12:15:23 AM ( 10 y ) ... viewed 1243 times "... most RD’s (Registered Dietitians) have not been properly trained in nutrition. Nutrition and dietary counselling should not be licensed to one group. ..." -
David Brownstein, M.D. Medical Director for the Center for Holistic Medicine:
http://blog.drbrownstein.com/round-2-time-to-repeal-a-stupid-dietary-law/
"Dr. B" is my kind of Doctor! I so appreciate his truthfulness and his activism into the State Legislature as he did "to repeal a stupid dietary-law"!
Registered Dietitians are required to be "diet dictocrats". You can gain a truly superior self-education that is well beyond that of most any Dietitian with just three or four books including:
"Nourishing Traditions"by Sally Fallon;
"Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" by Weston A. Price; and for more specifics regarding nutrition therapy see:
"The Fourfold Path to Healing" by Thomas S. Cowan, MD with Sally Fallon
June 8th -
Just submitted the following comment at Dr. Brownstein's site:
Thank You Dr. B and all!
Re: "the Constitution" - The "CONSTITUTION OF MICHIGAN OF 1850" includes an "Oath of office":
Sec. 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such officers as may by law be exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective office, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (of affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States ...."
The USA's "constitution of the United States" defines what Lawful jurisdiction is. That jurisdiction is limited to what the States have given to this government. It is a proprietary-based jurisdiction as stated in terms of its “exclusive Legislative jurisdiction” of that governmental entity. See: Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787, Quote- “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) ... and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And ...".
The federal government is "UNITED STATES INC.", pursuant to 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A § 3002(14) (15)(A): (15) “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation"
The States (through a number of nexuses) have become the equivalent of a franchise of the "Federal corporation". They are required to follow the written "corporate" rules. The written rules apply to the State and not directly to the people unless the people volunteer in. (See all four Organic Laws of the United States of America,(1) especially the first two!)
When an individual is presented with some form of a notice, citation, accusation or the like that a suspected "crime" has been committed on private land (that is other than what is owned by government) then the "accused" has an inalienable (God-given) Right to challenge the jurisdiction of the governing entity that made the allegation. Such an allegation must be immediately challenged in writing that includes a demand that the governmental agency ("employer" of the agent involved) present their evidence that the "subject land" (where the alleged "criminal" act took place) is within the proprietary jurisdiction of that governmental agency.(2) Proprietary jurisdiction is an undeniable fact in written American Law that has been established throughout the four Organic Laws of The United States of America.
Whatever "elected officials" enact as "law" must be understood to be limited to their own exclusive jurisdiction. There is no governmental jurisdiction over "free inhabitants" who are living within the boarders of the State unless the individual being accused volunteers into the jurisdiction. Virtually all individuals volunteer into the jurisdiction in exchange for government granted privileges.
Private communications among the free inhabitants are not a government granted privilege! There is no universal requirement to limit one's freedom in exchange for some form of government granted benefit. You have a choice and don't have to volunteer into it, regardless of any "law"/"ordinance"! To do so requires that you know the Law. Greater than the ignorance of the "elected officials" is the ignorance of the people who think everything that elected officials enact pertains to them!
June 14th update:
http://blog.drbrownstein.com/you-can-fight-city-hall-and-win/
(1) See the four “Organic Laws” in Volume 1 of the United States Code, (Titles 1-5). It is published every 6 years by the United States Government Printing Office. Here is your proof that the Organic Laws of the United States of America are pre- existent before any statute laws of the United States. Also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_law
(2) A written Notice and Demand acts as a notice to all government employees, or any agent who is acting under the color of an "order", of any US government, that ignorance of the written laws that limit authority to the land owned by and under the exclusive Legislative (Law making) Authority (jurisdiction) of the United States of America is no excuse for any government employee entity / person / agent, etc.
Also see: "General Brief- Where does the written law of all ‘State’ Legislative Bodies have force of law.":
(Scroll down):
http://freeinhabitant.info/2011/08
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
