Strange Fires - Part 3 by kerminator Blog entry

Blog: Forgotten Words!
by kerminator

Strange Fires - Part 3

** More on what they {the political controllers} are doing to you!
* NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) is an official oxymoron, double talk to disguise the advance guard of the piecemeal institution of global government under the banners of charity and public interest groups... these are the "major groups" Agenda 21 refers to and relies on to implement their program. So it doesn't matter that ICLEI as a premier example, and others, predate Agenda 21, they are serving its aims.

- If Anthropogenic Global Warming from Greenhouse Gases is a significant part of the climate then there are better ways to manage the atmosphere with the help of living billions who would enjoy prosperity from their efforts, than spraying them with chemtrails, and taking other anti-life measures in geo-engineering. HUH! ***

Date: 11/10/2013 11:23:58 AM ( 11 y ) ... viewed 10585 times

Here are more examples:

Out West millions of acres of farmland lies fallow, the farmers paid not to farm, so as to stabilize market prices, and conserve the soil for f arming. Logically, to conserve the soil for this purpose the farmers must be conserved as well, that is living on the land if they choose to, and they do: but Agenda 21 defeats this working strategy for the nation's food security and thereby threatens national security, and attacks the liberty of people to live on the land in rural homesteads and suburbs.

Owners of large tracts of land often prove to be able stewards of the land. In contrast under government management, particularly of the forests, the policy is lock up the forests and keep people out, and the result is to let them burn. Millions of acres of forest have needlessly burned, polluting the atmosphere with soot and that villainous gas CO2, because of road closures in compliance with Agenda 21. In the 21st century this lock 'em up and let burn "return to nature" policy has meant more than 5% of the total carbon emissions, all for nothing, when the people displaced actual had lower "carbon footprints."

In Indonesia, biologist Willie Smits took one of the worst pieces of deforested and barren land, 5,000 acres, and in a few short years re-grew rainforest with more than a 1000 species of plants, and employing 3,000 people, providing habitat for wildlife including primates, orangutans, and an increase of 132 species of birds, and measurably improving air quality that was also 10 degrees (F) cooler. He chose the worst land he could find to show that if it could be done with the worst, it would be a program that anyone could repeat. He said it was quite simple: the first step was to buy the land. He stresses that it is actually very biologically complicated, but this success was dependent on the clear legal status of private ownership. That way when people are involved they defend the land, but when it's state property the people do not defend it but instead exploit it.

There is another trend in human behavior that greatly reduces our impact on the land: the radius of play. In the past two generations in Western countries the radius of play of children has decreased to 1/9th of what it was the 1960s and 70s. This is the trend in the developing world too, as more and more children cocoon within their electronic entertainments at home, and adults as well are drawn into smaller radii of play. This can be seen as a bad thing in terms of personal development, but in environmental terms: there is a case to be made that expanding suburbia ten fold today, with today's technology, would actually have much less of an environmental impact than it did in your father's day.
(We should rather encourage kids to get out and play more, in natural settings, rather than confine them as institutional units to "smart growth" cities where the existential horror of a prison planet compels them to seek further refuge in realms of cultural works, TV, video games, and p 0 r n ~ Quixote)

That Agenda 21, and other eco-fascist schemes, are unnecessary to protect the environment should be obvious. We were doing fine without them, better in fact, and enjoying it. Again, the real agenda is about power.

Literally, it is about power:
the carbon trading schemes are essentially taxes on the air you breathe, supposedly required to prevent climate change forced by global warming, and also to adjust some segments of society, whole nations, to a powered down civilization of poor urban dwellers.
Look at a graph that shows carbon emissions by economic block, from 1860 to projected to 2140. The United States has to suffer very deep cuts in energy usage even as the rest of the whole gets the greater share of the remaining fossil fuel resources.

** {This is like the reverse descrimination that developed in the US with the Afirminative Action movment by the Federal Government! Which did not fix anything only increased the problems of certain racial groups today!}

This is pegged directly to economic activity, and value of the dollar. Energy is required for work, and so with diminished energy resources there is less work and an increase in poverty.
This illustrates an outcome of Agenda21 - transference of wealth, and the total impoverishment of the American people of the United States by 2070, except of course, the ruling elites who in their wisdom to defend the Earth have brought this about.

This is crisis mongering to fraudulent ends:
while "peak oil" is a genuine phenomena of natural stores of geological carbon resources, there is no energy crisis: the crisis is a crisis of intelligence, and government, which are falling lock in step with Agenda 21 to crush humanity under the boot heel of sustainable development.
This is the manifestation of the energy endgame, whereby the false scarcity is created in order to consolidate political power.

There is abundant energy available, even the limited "dark green" supply of wind, solar, and open ocean algae farming means that the real issue facing humanity is not how to manage with less, but what wonders can we achieve with much more.

Agenda 21 just gets in the way of real progress. Let's have sustainable freedom and the results will be better for everyone, and the environment.

~ Grim 2011